SHOW:
|
|
- or go back to the newest paste.
| 1 | Kerd vs Mik | |
| 2 | Round 1 | |
| 3 | ||
| 4 | Kerd | |
| 5 | * Peter/Ben will fight, where Peter is the better fighter. | |
| 6 | * Garou will target Black Beetle, who is an active idiot. | |
| 7 | * Team Kerd has better physicals than Team Mik. | |
| 8 | * Peter > Ben | |
| 9 | * Garou > BB | |
| 10 | * Sasuke can avoid the shit out of Strode, while impaling him with a spear. | |
| 11 | ||
| 12 | Mik | |
| 13 | * Team Mik is faster than team Kerd | |
| 14 | * Team Kerd's speed sucks. | |
| 15 | * Team Mik's offense > Team Kerd's defense | |
| 16 | * Team Mik's defense > Team Kerd's offense | |
| 17 | * The characterization Kerd presented is not consistent. | |
| 18 | * Garou admits to being inefficent | |
| 19 | * Team Mik acts way more efficiently | |
| 20 | * Garou also might just be incompetent | |
| 21 | * Strode's anti-feats are disproved with context | |
| 22 | * The flow of combat Kerd assumes probably won't even happen | |
| 23 | * And even if it does happen in the way Kerd says, Team Mik wins anyways. | |
| 24 | ||
| 25 | Round 2 | |
| 26 | ||
| 27 | Kerd | |
| 28 | * The characters are here to fight and beat each other | |
| 29 | * Garou's "fight" characterization is fine | |
| 30 | * Team Kerd's offense > Team Mik's defense | |
| 31 | * The better Spider-Man comment is most likely about character | |
| 32 | * Peter is likely better than Ben through more feats/statements | |
| 33 | * Team Kerd Offense > Team Mik Defense | |
| 34 | * Sasuke is strong and fast | |
| 35 | * Spider-Man feats are in greater quantity than anti-feats. | |
| 36 | * Strode's skill-precognition ain't shit compared to Sasuke's and Peter's | |
| 37 | * Team Kerd Ranged > Team MIk ranged | |
| 38 | * Black Beetle and Strode suck | |
| 39 | * Kerd's description of combat flow still works | |
| 40 | ||
| 41 | Mik | |
| 42 | * Piercing doesn't work on Strode | |
| 43 | * Strode too fast | |
| 44 | * Ben Stronk | |
| 45 | * Anti-feats Kerd provided are bad | |
| 46 | * Garou has no durability | |
| 47 | * Garou's offense sucks | |
| 48 | * Sasuake has no solid number for speed | |
| 49 | * Sasuake's durability sucks | |
| 50 | * More Spider-Man anti-feats. | |
| 51 | * In-character behavior | |
| 52 | * Some more Misc. stuff. | |
| 53 | ||
| 54 | _____ | |
| 55 | ||
| 56 | Alright. I want to say for the record, good job both of you. I think Kerd and Mik both did a great job at disassembling each other's characters, for better or for worse. That said, I am not entirely convinced by the Spider-Man anti-feat dump, mainly because Kerd addressed it when he could, and that last round last response anti-feat dump is hard to consider. I am not going to say I think Peter is useless, but I do think he at least has problems. | |
| 57 | ||
| 58 | - | All in all, I think Mik defended his characters a bit better. I think Black Beetle got destroyed by Kerd, but Mik at least protected his own Spider-Man and Strode. In contrast, I think Sasuke has problems (not unsalvageable, but problems), Ben has problems (not awful, but problems), and Garou just got obliterated. I also think Kerd's "he meant characterization" when it came to who the better Spider-Man defense was made an assumption that such things were mutually exclusive, especially when Mik also presents feats suggesting that Ben is likely to be better. |
| 58 | + | All in all, I think Mik defended his characters a bit better. I think Black Beetle got destroyed by Kerd, but Mik at least protected his own Spider-Man and Strode. In contrast, I think Sasuke has problems (not unsalvageable, but problems), Peter has problems (not awful, but problems), and Garou just got obliterated. I also think Kerd's "he meant characterization" when it came to who the better Spider-Man defense was made an assumption that such things were mutually exclusive, especially when Mik also presents feats suggesting that Ben is likely to be better. |
| 59 | ||
| 60 | I give Mik a very narrow win, but great job both of you. |
