SHOW:
|
|
- or go back to the newest paste.
| 1 | ==HOW TO READ P COMMS== | |
| 2 | - | *COMMS |
| 2 | + | https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1187547459700121600 |
| 3 | ||
| 4 | ||
| 5 | Two sets of two synonyms or three mentions of a term = significant. | |
| 6 | re: repeated 3x = signal (NOT noise) | |
| 7 | Check the timestamps on the posts and tweets capitalization on his Twitter | |
| 8 | 41 - George H. W. Bush | |
| 9 | 43 - George W. Bush | |
| 10 | brainlets = tripcode users | |
| 11 | 0 deltas tweets = comms open | |
| 12 | look for spoopy drop, thundercat arrival and or 0delta QnA | |
| 13 | Also, check the timestamp on the last one vs the first one, and think mirror. | |
| 14 | During homophones, hand signals will give you the coded (and correct, but unexpected) word to hear. Eyes open. | |
| 15 | ||
| 16 | Pay attention to when Potus Uses homophone words | |
| 17 | aye eye i | |
| 18 | awe, oar, or, ore | |
| 19 | metal, mettle | |
| 20 | rose flower, rose awake | |
| 21 | lie down lie, to people | |
| 22 | http://www.singularis.ltd.uk/bifroest/misc/homophones-list.html | |
| 23 | ||
| 24 | It is dif variations of possible code. 'code check' | |
| 25 | For example, if POTUS post at 4:45 then take a look at what Anons have been working on around that 'marker'. | |
| 26 | 4:45 > :45 | |
| 27 | 4:45 - 1 hr = 3:45 (compare to Anon post) | |
| 28 | 4:45 - 10 min = 4:35 | |
| 29 | 4:45 review posts before 4:45 for any Notable posts. | |
| 30 | 2:38:12, 21817, 1+2 = 3, 2+1 = 3, 38 38 17 etc. | |
| 31 | Goes as deep or as shallow as you take it. | |
| 32 | --- | |
| 33 | anon SPECIFICALLY cited a 10 minute delta | |
| 34 | [10] Delta | |
| 35 | >>21903 POTUS twat: The Democrats Scam goes on and on! They Do Nothing! | |
| 36 | Uhhh, anons that is what this anon calls a proof | |
| 37 | ||
| 38 | If this is the code, thinking within it is tricky. | |
| 39 | I notice POTUS can do it on the fly. | |
| 40 | Where as if i attempt, takes concentration. | |
| 41 | Especially when much time between deltas. | |
| 42 | Sometimes forget my own deltas markers, kek. | |
| 43 | - | Return comms doesn't have to be in same format/platform, kek. |
| 43 | + | |
| 44 | 1 way comms easiest. | |
| 45 | Return comms doesn't have to be in same format/platform, kek. | |
| 46 | ||
| 47 | ################ | |
| 48 | 'Where is the Whistleblower, and why did he or she write such a fictitious and incorrect account of my phone call with the Ukrainian President? Why did the IG allow this to happen? Who is the so-called Informant (Schiff?) who was so inaccurate? A giant Scam!' | |
| 49 | >Okay, which are the improperly cap'd letters? | |
| 50 | ||
| 51 | I see: | |
| 52 | >W | |
| 53 | >I | |
| 54 | >S | |
| 55 | ||
| 56 | //////////////////////////////////////////////// | |
| 57 | ||
| 58 | I see this all as common interpretation -- typing together improper capitalized entities. | |
| 59 | ||
| 60 | (W)histleblower | |
| 61 | Ukranian (P)resident | |
| 62 | - - - Ukranian is inherited because they together describe a single entity, linked with President. | |
| 63 | - - - Technically, this could be considered proper capitalization. The ambiguity in this means Gematria is not applicable, and one should use interpretation. | |
| 64 | (I)nformant | |
| 65 | (S)cam | |
| 66 | ||
| 67 | ||
| 68 | Now, relate to other capitalized, since we are interpreting and not germatria | |
| 69 | ||
| 70 | Where Whistleblower (with) Ukranian President [we already know no whistleblower was legitimately on the call.] | |
| 71 | Why, IG? | |
| 72 | Who (is the informant)? Schiff? | |
| 73 | (Schiff is) A Scam! | |
| 74 | ||
| 75 | This is how I read it. | |
| 76 | Maybe this is the right way to read it, maybe not... | |
| 77 | Any anons have thoughts on my decode? |
