SHOW:
|
|
- or go back to the newest paste.
| 1 | - | 1 ShuckleSplit + Acupressure on Chansey |
| 1 | + | HOW TO FILL UP THIS PASTEBIN: |
| 2 | - | 2 Good team (Good synergy, good pokemon) |
| 2 | + | |
| 3 | - | 3 Semi PerishTrap |
| 3 | + | .:Step 1:. |
| 4 | - | 4 Half-decent team (Too many common weaknesses, bad pokemon picks) |
| 4 | + | Find a battle in the most recent SMOGON DOUBLES ladder. |
| 5 | - | 5 Bad team (Bad pokemon picks, bad synergy) |
| 5 | + | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 6 | - | 6 Bad team (Bad pokemon picks, bad synergy) |
| 6 | + | .:Step 2:. |
| 7 | - | 7 Skill Swap (Slaking + Regigigas) and Lileep. |
| 7 | + | Look at the opponents team, if it's a gimmick that you know the name already, take note of it in one of the numbers below. |
| 8 | - | 8 Beat Up Weavile + Terrakion + Safeguard and Swagger + Aromatisse (Healer) |
| 8 | + | If it's not a gimmick that you know, keep going with the battle and figure it out. |
| 9 | - | 9 Good team (not so good synergy, good pokemon, not many common weaknesses) |
| 9 | + | After you discovered the "new" gimmick, you have to give it a name. Start with the name of MAIN move that the "new" gimmick relies on, and if the gimmick is only viable with one Pokemon, add that name to the start of the "new" gimmick. |
| 10 | - | 10 SwagPlay + Safeguard |
| 10 | + | example: Shuckle uses Guard Split! therefore: ShuckleGuardSplit , now make it short and easy to read: ShuckleSplit. |
| 11 | - | 11 Half-decent team (Decent synergy, bad pokemon) |
| 11 | + | |
| 12 | - | 12 Justified + Beat Up |
| 12 | + | .:What if it's not a gimmick?:. |
| 13 | - | 13 Half-decent team (Good pokemon, bad synergy) |
| 13 | + | Great! A non-gimmick user! Congratulate them on the chat before anything. |
| 14 | - | 14 Bad team (Bad synergy and pokemon) |
| 14 | + | Now to classify the team, this is the tricky part, so read carefully: |
| 15 | - | 15 Bad team (Bad synergy and pokemon) |
| 15 | + | ()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-() |
| 16 | - | 16 Good team (Decent synergy and pokemon) |
| 16 | + | The teams are divided in 3 names: |
| 17 | - | 17 Bad team (Bad pokemon picks, bad synergy) |
| 17 | + | ----------- |
| 18 | - | 18 Work Up + Baton Pass with SwagPlay |
| 18 | + | Good |
| 19 | - | 19 Beat Up + Justified |
| 19 | + | Bad |
| 20 | - | 20 Minun + Plus (Abilities) |
| 20 | + | Half-decent |
| 21 | ----------- | |
| 22 | - | STATISTICS |
| 22 | + | You'll have to follow the rules below to classify wheter it's a Good, Bad or Half-decent team: |
| 23 | - | 9 gimmicks |
| 23 | + | <> |
| 24 | - | 5 bad teams |
| 24 | + | For a good team: |
| 25 | - | 3 good teams |
| 25 | + | The team works well within the current meta and can defeat most teams if the user predicts well and makes the right moves/switches at the right time. The team has a good synergy between all the pokemons and has 0 to 2 common weaknesses. |
| 26 | - | 3 half-decent teams |
| 26 | + | <> |
| 27 | - | PERCENTAGES |
| 27 | + | For a half-decent team: |
| 28 | - | 45% gimmicks |
| 28 | + | The team doesnt work quite well within the current meta, it needs hard prediction and an at least decent team match-up to win, most of the pokemon in it are mainly outclassed by higher rank threats, it has few common weaknesses and a decent synergy between a few pokemons. |
| 29 | - | 25% bad teams |
| 29 | + | <> |
| 30 | - | 15% Good teams |
| 30 | + | For a bad team: |
| 31 | - | 15% Half decent teams |
| 31 | + | The team works badly in the current meta, 4 or more pokemon in it are just plain bad or outclassed by higher rank threats. The team doesnt have much synergy and/or has many common weaknesses. |
| 32 | ()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-() | |
| 33 | - | Bad pokemon picks/Bad pokemon: Pokemon that do not fit with the current meta very well; Pokemon that are just plain bad and/or outclassed |
| 33 | + | .:Step 3:. |
| 34 | - | Synergy: If the pokemon work together, dont have many common weaknesses and/or if the team can work well in the current meta. |
| 34 | + | FILLING UP THE NUMBERS BELOW |
| 35 | ||
| 36 | To fill up the numbers below it's really easy, if it's a gimmick, just type the gimmick's name right after the number, with a space between the number and the first letter (of course). | |
| 37 | If it's not a gimmick, then just say if it's a Good, Bad or half-decent team, followed by () with a short explanation on why the team has that rank. | |
| 38 | ||
| 39 | That's all there is to it! Thanks for helping with the Ladder Scout :P, now proceed to battle and fill up the numbers below! | |
| 40 | ||
| 41 | NOTEEEEEEEEEE: | |
| 42 | IF THE TEAM IS STOLEN FROM AN RMT, TAKE NOTE OF THAT IN THE NUMBERS BELOW. | |
| 43 | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | |
| 44 | ||
| 45 | 1 | |
| 46 | 2 | |
| 47 | 3 | |
| 48 | 4 | |
| 49 | 5 | |
| 50 | 6 | |
| 51 | 7 | |
| 52 | 8 | |
| 53 | 9 | |
| 54 | 10 | |
| 55 | 11 | |
| 56 | 12 | |
| 57 | 13 | |
| 58 | 14 | |
| 59 | 15 | |
| 60 | 16 | |
| 61 | 17 | |
| 62 | 18 | |
| 63 | 19 | |
| 64 | 20 | |
| 65 | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | |
| 66 | YOUR NAME HERE: |