ImperiiFi

Untitled

Jan 7th, 2020
61
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 8.96 KB | None | 0 0
  1. The representational view can explain the votes of Representatives Peterson, possibly Golden, probably not Van Drew, possibly Gabbard, and possibly Amash. Representative Peterson won Minnesota's 7th Congressional District by a margin of 4.26% in the 2018 midterm election (Citation); President Trump won that district by a margin of 31.75% in the 2016 presidial election (Citation). President Trump received 9.68% more votes in his election than Representative Peterson did in his; President Trump was significantly more popular as compared to Representative Peterson, which can explain why Representative Peterson voted against impeachment. Representative Golden won Maine's 2nd Congressional District by a margin of 1.25% (Citation); President Trump won that district by a margin of 10.28% (Citation). President Trump received 0.8% more votes in his election than Representative Golden did in his; President Trump is about as popular as Representative Golden, which maybe explains why Representative Golden voted against one Article of Impeachment but in favor of another. However, it is a weak explanation at best. Representative Van Drew won New Jersey's 2nd Congressional District by a margin of 7.67% (Citation); President Trump won that district by a margin of 4.62% (Citation). Representative Van Drew received 2.28% more votes in his election than President Trump did in his; President Trump was somewhat less popular as compared to Representative Van Drew, which does not explain why Representative Van Drew voted against impeachment. Representative Gabbard won Hawaii's 2nd Congressional District by a margin of 54.72% (Citation); President Trump lost that district by a margin of 31.85% (Citation). Representative Gabbard received 47.8% more votes in her election than President Trump did in his; President Trump was significantly less popular as compared to Representative Gabbard, which certainly does not explain why Representative Gabbard voted "present" on both Articles of Impeachment. However, an explanation may be found in that President Trump received 304 electoral votes in the 2016 Presidential Election, as compared to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's 227. As Representative Gabbard is currently a candidate in the 2020 Presidential Election, she may have concluded that Trump is more popular with the voters she is most concerned with. Representative Amash won Michigan's 3rd Congressional District by a margin of 11.24% (Citation); President Trump won that district by a margin of 9.44% (Citation). Representative Amash received 2.82% more votes in his election than President Trump did in his; President Trump was somewhat less popular as compared to Representative Amash, which might explain why Representative Amash voted for impeachment.
  2.  
  3. The representational view can explain the votes of Representatives Peterson, possibly Golden, probably not Van Drew, possibly Gabbard, and possibly Amash.
  4. Representative Peterson won Minnesota's 7th Congressional District by a margin of 4.26% in the 2018 midterm election (Citation); President Trump won that district by a margin of 31.75% in the 2016 presidial election (Citation). President Trump received 9.68% more votes in his election than Representative Peterson did in his; President Trump was significantly more popular as compared to Representative Peterson, which can explain why Representative Peterson voted against impeachment.
  5. Representative Golden won Maine's 2nd Congressional District by a margin of 1.25% (Citation); President Trump won that district by a margin of 10.28% (Citation). President Trump received 0.8% more votes in his election than Representative Golden did in his; President Trump is about as popular as Representative Golden, which maybe explains why Representative Golden voted against one Article of Impeachment but in favor of another. However, it is a weak explanation at best.
  6. Representative Van Drew won New Jersey's 2nd Congressional District by a margin of 7.67% (Citation); President Trump won that district by a margin of 4.62% (Citation). Representative Van Drew received 2.28% more votes in his election than President Trump did in his; President Trump was somewhat less popular as compared to Representative Van Drew, which does not explain why Representative Van Drew voted against impeachment.
  7. Representative Gabbard won Hawaii's 2nd Congressional District by a margin of 54.72% (Citation); President Trump lost that district by a margin of 31.85% (Citation). Representative Gabbard received 47.8% more votes in her election than President Trump did in his; President Trump was significantly less popular as compared to Representative Gabbard, which certainly does not explain why Representative Gabbard voted "present" on both Articles of Impeachment. However, an explanation may be found in that President Trump received 304 electoral votes in the 2016 Presidential Election, as compared to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's 227. As Representative Gabbard is currently a candidate in the 2020 Presidential Election, she may have concluded that Trump is more popular with the voters she is most concerned with.
  8. Representative Amash won Michigan's 3rd Congressional District by a margin of 11.24% (Citation); President Trump won that district by a margin of 9.44% (Citation). Representative Amash received 2.82% more votes in his election than President Trump did in his; President Trump was somewhat less popular as compared to Representative Amash, which might explain why Representative Amash voted for impeachment.
  9.  
  10.  
  11.  
  12.  
  13.  
  14. The representational view can explain the votes of Representatives Peterson, possibly Golden, probably not Van Drew, possibly Gabbard, and possibly Amash.
  15.  
  16. Representative Peterson won Minnesota's 7th Congressional District by a margin of 4.26% in the 2018 midterm election (Citation); President Trump won that district by a margin of 31.75% in the 2016 presidial election (Citation).
  17. President Trump received 9.68% more votes in his election than Representative Peterson did in his;
  18. President Trump was significantly more popular as compared to Representative Peterson, which can explain why Representative Peterson voted against impeachment.
  19. 146,672 0.5210206423 Peterson
  20. 134,668 0.4783790216
  21. 281,509 4.26 more
  22. 61.78 Trump
  23. 30.03
  24. 31.75 9.68
  25. Representative Golden won Maine's 2nd Congressional District by a margin of 1.25% (Citation); President Trump won that district by a margin of 10.28% (Citation).
  26. President Trump received 0.8% more votes in his election than Representative Golden did in his;
  27. President Trump is about as popular as Representative Golden, which maybe explains why Representative Golden voted against one Article of Impeachment but in favor of another. However, it is a weak explanation at best.
  28. 142,440 0.5062355396 Golden
  29. 138,931 0.4937644604
  30. 281,371 1.25 about as
  31. 51.42 Trump
  32. 41.14
  33. 10.28 0.8
  34. Representative Van Drew won New Jersey's 2nd Congressional District by a margin of 7.67% (Citation); President Trump won that district by a margin of 4.62% (Citation).
  35. Representative Van Drew received 2.28% more votes in his election than President Trump did in his;
  36. President Trump was somewhat less popular as compared to Representative Van Drew, which does not explain why Representative Van Drew voted against impeachment.
  37. 136,685 0.5290424713 Van Drew
  38. 116,866 0.4523325708
  39. 258,363 7.67 less
  40. 50.62 Trump
  41. 46
  42. 0 -2.28
  43. Representative Gabbard won Hawaii's 2nd Congressional District by a margin of 54.72% (Citation); President Trump lost that district by a margin of 31.85% (Citation).
  44. Representative Gabbard received 47.8% more votes in her election than President Trump did in his;
  45. President Trump was significantly less popular as compared to Representative Gabbard, which certainly does not explain why Representative Gabbard voted "present" on both Articles of Impeachment.
  46. However, an explanation may be found in that President Trump received 304 electoral votes in the 2016 Presidential Election, as compared to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's 227. As Representative Gabbard is currently a candidate in the 2020 Presidential Election, she may have concluded that Trump is more popular with the voters she is most concerned with.
  47. 153,271 0.7736231899 Gabbard
  48. 44,850 0.2263768101
  49. 198,121 54.72 less "present" 77
  50. 29.56 Trump
  51. 61.41
  52. 0 -47.8
  53. Representative Amash won Michigan's 3rd Congressional District by a margin of 11.24% (Citation); President Trump won that district by a margin of 9.44% (Citation).
  54. Representative Amash received 2.82% more votes in his election than President Trump did in his;
  55. President Trump was somewhat less popular as compared to Representative Amash, which might explain why Representative Amash voted for impeachment.
  56. 169,107 0.5442073759 Amash
  57. 134,185 0.431824033
  58. 310,740 11.24 less
  59. 51.6 Trump
  60. 42.16
  61. 0 -2.82
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment