1. That state is largely the same is not true. There may be a few variables at best named the same, everything else is completely different. You're only claiming things look the same from your technically limited point of view without much evidence.

2. Anti-lag algorithm. Your one liner is an algorithm?

3. Design errors? Which ones?

4. What timing? Again, you're claiming based on how things appear to you, nothing more.

5. FAQ. Thanks for bringing that up (which we benchmarked from) when I thought we're talking about tech/code.

ANYHOW: Ok sure. At this point, kudos to your abilities to make a ton of convincing assumptions/exaggerations in this whole branding game. If I were the incumbent, I'd frankly do the same: try to put down an auspicious competitor as much as possible and as early as possible.

I'm sure the readers would side with the incumbents for sure.

In any case, we'll move forward with our vision/updates. The truth is, we'll never scam any of our players. We just never will. Definitely come at us if we ever do, and we'll make sure we resolve any issues that arise. In the meantime, we plan to offer exciting promotions all the time to engage our users. Fun and trust.

PS: I'm just a bit shocked my account's been "flagged". Again congratulations. Also none of you replied to our call invitation. No problem.