Advertisement
Guest User

Untitled

a guest
Jan 17th, 2019
77
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 8.24 KB | None | 0 0
  1.  
  2. Napol11/15/2018
  3. Bit confused here, did not Shanks rule this in my favour?
  4. WickJeffe πŸ˜¬πŸŽ…11/15/2018
  5. no
  6. he said to adjust things according to you having one plate only
  7. Napol11/15/2018
  8. Yes, and your argument was that the camera would catch my rear plate.
  9. So, what's the issue?
  10. You said, the cameras would catch my rear plate, I don't have a rear plate.
  11. WickJeffe πŸ˜¬πŸŽ…11/15/2018
  12. calculating the chances and knowing the facts either one plate would also not be captured by CCTVs before going for a reverse
  13. Napol11/15/2018
  14. Right, but when you made your decision you made it upon that the rear plate would be visible to CCTV right?
  15. WickJeffe πŸ˜¬πŸŽ…11/15/2018
  16. that was mainly my point, got proved wrong doesn't mean instant reverse
  17. i still gotta see why CCTVs wouldn't capture front plates
  18. Napol11/15/2018
  19. Because how the hell would a CCTV capture the front plates going reverse lol?
  20. WickJeffe πŸ˜¬πŸŽ…11/15/2018
  21. the report was mainly either you had a rear plate or not, shanks said not
  22. so i still am in position to judge what is going next
  23. shanks's part is over
  24. just draw a line of how you approached the vehicle
  25. Napol11/15/2018
  26. I don't remember how I approached the vehicle, it was almost two months ago.
  27. but if I'm going reverse, how would they capture my front plates?
  28. WickJeffe πŸ˜¬πŸŽ…11/15/2018
  29. so you were approaching the vehicle in a reverse motion yeah?
  30. Napol11/15/2018
  31. Yes, I was.
  32. WickJeffe πŸ˜¬πŸŽ…11/15/2018
  33. so every circle within this screen is a CCTV cam that the owner of the vehicle was in power of
  34. https://postimg.cc/K3jZd5Mc
  35. lolg β€” Postimage.org
  36.  
  37. Napol11/15/2018
  38. Is that his CCTV camera?
  39. WickJeffe πŸ˜¬πŸŽ…11/15/2018
  40. I will hit back the location, test things out and see either the other cctvs would've capture your plates
  41. Napol11/15/2018
  42. Lmfao
  43. so wait
  44. WickJeffe πŸ˜¬πŸŽ…11/15/2018
  45. yeah?
  46. Napol11/15/2018
  47. cops don't have to ask around
  48. the houses
  49. WickJeffe πŸ˜¬πŸŽ…11/15/2018
  50. they don't
  51. its the owner
  52. who got the plates
  53. then he reported to PD
  54. the house belonged to a friend of his that owns that house
  55. yeah one of the CCTVs would capture your front plate
  56. Napol11/15/2018
  57. Which one's hat.
  58. WickJeffe πŸ˜¬πŸŽ…11/15/2018
  59. second
  60.  
  61.  
  62. Napol11/15/2018
  63. Right, first of all that angle is a bit weird
  64. besides the fact that it's taken a lot more left than it actually is.
  65. A camera does not have the same angle
  66. as your computer screen?
  67. a camera has like
  68. a 45 degree angle
  69.  
  70. WickJeffe πŸ˜¬πŸŽ…11/15/2018
  71. that's exactly its angle
  72.  
  73. so eitherways your plates would still be captured, anything else you would like to add?
  74. Napol11/15/2018
  75. So basically you're telling me this camera, would manage to capture a moving car's plate at nighttime.
  76. Not from it's own driveway, but from a house across the street's driveway?
  77. WickJeffe πŸ˜¬πŸŽ…11/15/2018
  78. yeah, don't make it sound impossible since within the circle is all where the action happened
  79.  
  80. Napol11/15/2018
  81. Yes, but that part would be covered by the branches, would it not?
  82. The tree is right there.
  83. hell, there's even a freking GTA SA object branch sticking out exactly at where the plates are located LOL
  84. WickJeffe πŸ˜¬πŸŽ…11/15/2018
  85. you also made your way out so its possible to capture your plates
  86. that's where i stand at
  87. Napol11/15/2018
  88. I made my way out, by making a right (CCTV's left) so there's even more trees?
  89. WickJeffe πŸ˜¬πŸŽ…11/15/2018
  90. a couple of tree branches wouldn't block the view no, at least during the tow process
  91. Napol11/15/2018
  92. The tree is right infront of the CCTV, so it could very well block the view.
  93. WickJeffe πŸ˜¬πŸŽ…11/15/2018
  94. maybe that's whilst making your way out
  95. during the tow process it would still capture it
  96.  
  97. Napol11/15/2018
  98. So, just that we're clear you're saying that this camera captured a plate at night-time again, not near the house but at the other side?
  99. WickJeffe πŸ˜¬πŸŽ…11/15/2018
  100. that's even the exact view of the CCTV
  101. Napol11/15/2018
  102. I mean, you do realize the quality would diminish from being so far away, PLUS it being nighttime?
  103. WickJeffe πŸ˜¬πŸŽ…11/15/2018
  104. so far away?
  105. its one street away
  106. 3 meters away
  107. 5 meters max
  108. how far that is?
  109. Napol11/15/2018
  110. Five meters?
  111. WickJeffe πŸ˜¬πŸŽ…11/15/2018
  112. one street away
  113. Napol11/15/2018
  114. https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/494935761624367114/512708489370402827/mta-screen_2018-11-15_21-20-24.png
  115.  
  116. You're sayin this is five meters?
  117. To the other drive-through?
  118. WickJeffe πŸ˜¬πŸŽ…11/15/2018
  119. one street away
  120. that's far?
  121. Napol11/15/2018
  122. I'd consider that far yes, I don't know where you got the 3-5m from.
  123. WickJeffe πŸ˜¬πŸŽ…11/15/2018
  124. are you even aware of the fact that cctv cams can zoom in and out?
  125. Napol11/15/2018
  126. Are all cameras able to zoom? I had no idea.
  127. Does it zoom autoamtically?
  128. Like everytime it sees a car, it zooms in?
  129. WickJeffe πŸ˜¬πŸŽ…11/15/2018
  130. man listen
  131. that's my statement take it or leave it either the CCTV had zoom or not it would still be able to capture the plates
  132. move it back to UCP if you aren't satisfied
  133. Napol11/15/2018
  134. No, you see I made the staff report because I wasn't satisified with your decision.
  135. WickJeffe πŸ˜¬πŸŽ…11/15/2018
  136. yeah then continue and proceed with it
  137. Napol11/15/2018
  138. ANd in the Staff report I literally proved your decision wrong.
  139. Now you've gone back on your decision.
  140. And made the same fucking decision with a new conclusion?
  141. WickJeffe πŸ˜¬πŸŽ…11/15/2018
  142. yeah no watch your language or i will totally stop talking here as its not within my duty to contact you via discord rather than ticket
  143. my statement was totally different, we were talking about the possibilities of the owner cctvs to capture your /rear/ plates
  144. Napol11/15/2018
  145. That's not the owners CCTV camera.
  146. WickJeffe πŸ˜¬πŸŽ…11/15/2018
  147. now we are talking about the front plates and how the rp should go as the UAT told me to
  148. Napol11/15/2018
  149. Did the owner RP getting CCTV from his friend?
  150. WickJeffe πŸ˜¬πŸŽ…11/15/2018
  151. will dig logs of that, only if you confirm that we aren't going in loops at the moment
  152. i'm not going to prove stuff then go back to previous points we talked about
  153. Napol11/15/2018
  154. Yes, we're not going in the loops.
  155. This is the last point I'll make.
  156. WickJeffe πŸ˜¬πŸŽ…11/15/2018
  157. give me your character name
  158. Napol11/15/2018
  159. Solak Uzun.
  160. WickJeffe πŸ˜¬πŸŽ…11/15/2018
  161. any clue when you stole the vehicle?
  162. Napol11/15/2018
  163. Uhh, should be 26th.
  164. Or 27th.
  165. WickJeffe πŸ˜¬πŸŽ…11/15/2018
  166. yeah it was at 27 and unable to reach logs during that time
  167. it jumps straight to 22/9
  168. Napol11/15/2018
  169. Lol what happened during those days?
  170. WickJeffe πŸ˜¬πŸŽ…11/15/2018
  171. no cloue
  172. clue*
  173. even ran logs of my own characters and they are missing
  174. Napol11/15/2018
  175. Right err.
  176. What's the plan here then?
  177. Napol11/16/2018
  178. ?
  179. WickJeffe πŸ˜¬πŸŽ…11/16/2018
  180. can't check his logs tho
  181. Napol11/16/2018
  182. Right, but what's the off-chance that he asked his friend about the CCTV?
  183. Napol11/17/2018
  184. Wait, what logs did you check
  185. My logs or the character I stole the car from?
  186. WickJeffe πŸ˜¬πŸŽ…11/17/2018
  187. character logs
  188. Napol11/17/2018
  189. lol are all character logs from that time gone?
  190. WickJeffe πŸ˜¬πŸŽ…11/17/2018
  191. as it seems
  192. log searched my character as well
  193. the one i used to supervise
  194. found nothing
  195. Napol11/17/2018
  196. And the logs of the character that had their car stolen aswell?
  197. Napol11/17/2018
  198. ?
  199. WickJeffe πŸ˜¬πŸŽ…11/17/2018
  200. yeah
  201. pretty much
  202. every other character i had as well
  203. Napol11/17/2018
  204. What’s the plan then?
  205. WickJeffe πŸ˜¬πŸŽ…11/17/2018
  206. dunno, might ask choas whenever i can reach him
  207. Napol11/17/2018
  208. I mean if he did ask his friend for his CCTV
  209. then that’s that
  210. otherwise it would be metagaming to use that CCTV
  211. WickJeffe πŸ˜¬πŸŽ…11/17/2018
  212. yeah its mainly his friend the one who told me about it
  213. but gotta gather the logs
  214. Napol11/21/2018
  215. Any updates?
  216. WickJeffe πŸ˜¬πŸŽ…11/21/2018
  217. no
  218. can't hack into the server sadly
  219. Napol11/21/2018
  220. ye but u can ask chaos?
  221. WickJeffe πŸ˜¬πŸŽ…11/21/2018
  222. go ahead
  223. Napol11/21/2018
  224. well i thought you said you’re going to but alright I will
  225. Napol11/21/2018
  226. Seems like the logs are gone then, no way to retrieve them either.
  227. WickJeffe πŸ˜¬πŸŽ…11/21/2018
  228. pretty much the case at the current state
  229. Napol11/21/2018
  230. So there’s no way to prove either side, lol.
  231. Napol11/24/2018
  232. Maybe we take it back to the staff-report for a final verdict?
  233. WickJeffe πŸ˜¬πŸŽ…11/24/2018
  234. sure
  235. keep swanker updated
  236. Napol11/28/2018
  237. Posted my part of the ticket.
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement