Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up,
it unlocks many cool features!
- Lesta Nediam LNC2017-04-03 2305 +Eccentric Views
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nrTyjZ4PXXo&lc=z13dilqy4kabf3ncg22hcd5xmka2vxhql04
- https://pastebin.com/d64RbfvY
- __
- +Eccentric Views __ Likewise and all good. I have been doing "battle" in the comments on YouTube for nearly two and a half years so I am accustomed to this kind of thing.
- I encourage you to examine the possibility that the people promoting this event as fake are too biased to be covering it properly. In this video I have _undeniably_ shown something that goes against the "no car" position - *and* it has been _intentionally left out._
- You wouldn't have even known about it if all you did was listen to "Peekay" and pals. You only know about it because of me - and I wonder what else I'd find if I went through all of these people's videos on the event.
- These people are focusing only on those elements which can be easily doubted while disregarding those other elements which cannot. Have they explained how a pre-damaged second car was realistically positioned despite the general public being able to freely move about? (After all - "Peekay's son" was supposedly in the area!)
- Do the "explanations" given make sense (are they rooted in reality?) or do they require their charm to get you to accept what is really just a fantasy?
- Have you not seen the footage of police knee-dropping the alleged driver? Refer to pp. 43-44 of the PDF. Watch the unlisted video where you can see police punch and then aggressively knee drop the alleged driver as he lay motionless on the ground.
- According to "Peekay" and pals - that has to be a dummy but since when do the police want that kind of thing captured on camera for posterity?! Its existence gives criminals a win.
- Of course - it _has_ to be a dummy in the mind of people like "Peekay" - otherwise they would have to consider the possibility it was a real event. If *you* are wrong about this event it means those injured people are real people and not mere "crisis actors".
- It means that innocent people - while going about their day - have been recklessly and excessively harmed. This is a fact people like "Peekay" do not give a f_kc about.
- You need to be ABSOLUTELY CERTAIN you are correct before you call it a "hoax". And if anyone is calling it a hoax *and* being sneaky by omitting certain things that go against the "hoax" position _then those people should be held to account._
- And that is what I am here doing. I am holding these people to account. No one else is.
- Have you considered the possibility that the news media knows very well how "conspiracy theorists" will react to the way the news has presented this event? Conflicting details - such as the timeline discrepancies - is a great way to encourage "conspiracy theorists" to reject the event as fake ("they can't even get their times right!").
- Even if the event had been a hoax - do you really think the event organisers are *that* incompetent? If there is a conflict with the timelines - you're either getting information from the wrong source *or it is intentional.*
- You're _supposed_ to call it fake. And when the bait is taken (recall that "Peekay" allegedly got into some trouble during the event) it will help accelerate the process of classifying "truth talk" as a form of "hate speech" and having it forbidden online.
- People like "Peekay" are agitators who are endeavouring to build up an audience of intellectually vulnerable people who they can manipulate.
- I have appealed to you - with more words than I know you prefer - because you started out thinking of the event as real and your opinion changed because of observations made by people like "Peekay". *But those observations are all bad observations* - _otherwise I'd be calling the event fake as well._
- There are good reasons to think that police were partly responsible for the carnage on that day - yet how strange that those who claim to be all about the "truth" won't even consider that possibility.
- The people calling the event fake don't care about the event being real or fake. They only care about capturing and cultivating an audience of people who *can* believe it was fake. And when that audience is told "this is fake", "you have to be stupid to think any of this is real" - _with every video_ - it has a controlling and manipulative effect.
- It causes you to focus on the doubtable details to the exclusion of those that aren't. It causes you to perceive what could be a real event as fake. That's f_kced! You - and others - are being mind f_kced by charming scumbags and I am trying to break that spell.
- *There should be a simple and innocent explanation for what I have pointed out. If the answer is anything but simple then you will have your answer about them.*
- ______________________________________________________________
- My name is Lesta Nediam and I am cracking reality like a nut.
- Lesta Nediam's YouTube Channel:
- https://www.youtube.com/c/LestaNediamHQ
- Lesta Nediam's Google Plus:
- https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ
- Lesta Nediam's Official Blog:
- https://lestanediam.blogspot.com
- Lesta Nediam's Twitter:
- https://twitter.com/LestaNediam
- Lesta Nediam's Vimeo
- https://vimeo.com/lestanediam
- Lesta Nediam's Vidme
- https://vid.me/LestaNediam
- Lesta Nediam's Dailymotion
- https://www.dailymotion.com/LestaNediam
- Lesta Nediam's LiveLeak
- https://www.liveleak.com/c/LestaNediam
- Lesta Nediam's Disqus:
- https://disqus.com/home/forum/lestanediam/
- Lesta Nediam's Archived Public Comments:
- https://pastebin.com/u/Lesta
- What does not exist - exists to exist.
- What exists - exists to always exist.
- As it is written - so it is done.
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
