Sargon

Gotta poison the well. All he can do. He knows he has no answers but cant bring himself to accept the answers he never even considers at even the barest level

http://archive.is/ws9UZ
http://archive.is/8jHoj
http://archive.is/YC1dI

It is very clear Sargon doesnt want to engage. He wants to use comments and tweets as a basis for dismissal, or anything as a basis for dismissal but those are abundant and easy. Which is of course dishonest by his own standards. He has outright said twitter and social media platforms are shit for communicating ideas and suggested his own community use streams. And his alleged principle of charity.

It is easier to be gatekeeper if nobody can challenge you right there, hence he didnt reply to Jared Taylor's debate offer.

I saw this with him usig a very truncated clip kf a spencer rally. And kraut began with the 30 second clips at his race realism videos. All hbomberguy, contrapoints stuff as Jean Francois gariepy noted. Same editing and cover based pot shots crap.

Moreover, the point of this is to dismiss, usually with a justification which is ultimately "you cant do that, I say so". He wants to be an obscurantist by shifting the debate away from any empirical argument of core issues. And to dismiss Lyle a good little gatekeeper, keeping out unwanted narratives or arguments which can shift the window away from what he is okay with

He has had numerous offers to debate people of importance and credentials. He clearly jasnt take it up

With Rubin he suddenly decided you cant argue against identity politics, really he has decided he has no argument

He routinely ignores serious and challenging comments or misrepresents ideas, or statements. Then complains when he doesnt get them. Nigga, you don't read or respond to them and most certainly ignore the sources we post that youtube doesnt censor.

As do others, in a video decrying a lack of arguments (by looking at the comments section during a period where argumentative comments were gone and yet to be replaced by new ones...and also looking at comments to begin with rather than response videos) I see lots of arguments against Vee, especially as one scrolls down
http://archive.is/PnxU6
http://archive.is/X92SD

Sargon does the same thing, using what will obviously be low effort posts as a case study. Even good comments by Girlwriteswhat and Aydin paladin (for Kraut) are ignored.

Really when you look at skeptic videos on the altright, the altright is at least presenting an argument in the comments. Not everyone, but far more than the skeptic fans who just repeat blase slogans. Which is fitting because that's the most the skeptics themselves have really, just with some more support.

Also, Vee tried using Lewontin to argue race isn't real because Lewontin had the credentials he deemed necessary to judge the issue...Lewontin's most famous contribution was his attempts to deny race being called "Lewontin's Fallacy"

Point I am making is Vee is an idiot but trying to use his platform to give himself some illusion of authority. All the skeptics do it



We dont have a great representation on youtube sadly, and the people who know how to argue against hyperindividualism arent on it

Karen: said nothing molyneux, allsup, and other altright commenters havent said. Sargon just ignores it. Baked Alaska got him on this even. Cuckservatives and Sargon have no solition to identity politics. Albeit, many of these arguments were implicit rather than explicit, but basically any argument saying you cant just debunk tribalism and identity, that they are part of human nature, is simply wishful thinking at best