Advertisement
Guest User

Update on SEC whistleblower retaliation case for AT&T

a guest
Sep 12th, 2013
119
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 3.37 KB | None | 0 0
  1. Mr. Macias:
  2.  
  3. At this point, I have reviewed all the available evidence submitted by
  4. you and AT&T. For a whistleblower retaliation complaint to be
  5. validated, it must meet ALL 4 of the following elements:
  6. 1) Complainant (employee) must have engaged in protected activity;
  7. 2) Respondent (employer) must have employer knowledge of the protected
  8. activity;
  9. 3) Complainant suffered adverse action (e.g., termination); AND
  10. 4) Nexus or a causal connection must exist between 1) and 3)--the
  11. adverse action must be due to the protected activity, not due to some
  12. other reason (e.g., employee misconduct).
  13. If any ONE of these elements should fail (not supported by the
  14. evidence), then the whistleblower retaliation complaint as a whole would
  15. fail in its entirety.
  16. In addition, the burden of proof for these elements is on the
  17. Complainant (employee). If a company provides evidence that any of
  18. these 4 elements is insufficiently supported, then the complaint would
  19. be dismissed.
  20.  
  21. In your case, element 4 (nexus) in particular appears to lack sufficient
  22. evidence. The current evidence indicates that you were terminated for
  23. using your company cell phone (COU) to transmit prohibited or
  24. inappropriate messages or images that violate company policy, which AT&T
  25. discovered during the course of an investigation into a sexual
  26. harassment complaint filed against you by another employee unrelated to
  27. your protected activity. Furthermore, because AT&T had disciplined or
  28. terminated other employees who misused their COU equipment in similar
  29. situations, you were not singled out for termination.
  30.  
  31. Unless you can rebut the evidence regarding the lack of nexus--that you
  32. were terminated due to violating company policy regarding the use of COU
  33. equipment (cell phone)--your OSHA complaint filed under the Sarbanes
  34. Oxley Act (SOX) will be dismissed due to lack of nexus evidence. Keep
  35. in mind that the OSHA complaint is only the first preliminary step of
  36. the administrative process in a SOX whistleblower complaint. In the
  37. event of an OSHA dismissal, you can appeal the OSHA dismissal to the
  38. Office of Administrative Law Judges (OALJ), which will conduct its own
  39. hearing/trial for you if you comply with its filing requirements and
  40. deadlines. The OALJ does not have to abide by or consider OSHA's
  41. determination (dismissal), and has the authority to make an independent
  42. ("de novo") decision regarding the merits of your complaint.
  43.  
  44. Alternatively, you could choose to withdraw your OSHA/SOX complaint.
  45. Withdrawal will waive your right to appeal to the OALJ, however (i.e.,
  46. you can't appeal or continue your complaint with the OALJ if you
  47. withdraw your OSHA complaint). If you wish to withdraw rather than
  48. receive the dismissal decision from OSHA with appeals rights, please let
  49. me know.
  50.  
  51. If you have any questions, please contact me. Please submit any other
  52. rebuttal information on the nexus issue to me no later than COB
  53. Thursday, September 19, 2013. In the event of an OSHA dismissal due to
  54. insufficient evidence of nexus, OSHA will send you the official
  55. determination via a Secretary's Findings letter, which will also contain
  56. information on how to appeal the OSHA dismissal to the OALJ if you so
  57. choose.
  58.  
  59.  
  60. Blake C. Wu
  61. U.S. Department of Labor-OSHA
  62. Region 9 Whistleblower Investigations Program
  63. 90 7th Street, #18-100
  64. San Francisco, CA 94103
  65. (415) 625-2533
  66. (415) 625-2534 (fax)
  67. wu.blake@dol.gov
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement