Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up,
it unlocks many cool features!
- Lesta Nediam LNC2016-06-09 1000 +nationalparksign
- https://plus.google.com/108131621397475586556/posts/RuqRM2DpBsy
- https://pastebin.com/chU7GSBV
- __
- +nationalparksign __ Good example - that's how it works on this placebo planet. Those people trust you (to not prank them). They believed the tattoo was real (the rose part) and so it was easy for them to then imagine you went ahead with adding a name.
- They believe they live in a world where "stranger things have happened" and because they can imagine something to be true *and* trust you - they are rendered powerless to resist believing.
- You gave them a suggestion with the appearances of proof. That's all that's needed. That's all that's ever needed.
- Because the people you showed the name to now know you pranked/deceived them they might be more cautious if you try the same thing again in future. Establish a pattern of doing this kind of thing and the trust you have will be broken and lost and won't be regained (much like how I can never trust another thing shown on the nightly news or what's posted to "NASA's" YouTube channel - the recent "Tim Peake" interview was filled with glitches - they even acknowledged it with "we lost you there for a moment").
- Via naturally "charming" and "charismatic" people the lie system presents suggestions packaged with the appearances of proof to the population. People who we feel inclined to "forgive" and "give a second chance" to if we were to find out they had lied.
- +Terran Downvale has focused on that r4pe "event". Also in the news has been the "Bill Cosby" r4pe allegations - also dealing with "unconscious victims". And so an intended consequence of the article might to cause people to hate "Bill Cosby" (if we hate that kid for what he did then oughtn't we hate "Bill Cosby" even more?). Although it's speculation it illustrates the differences in attitude between a "naturally charismatic person" and a "more regular person".
- __
- One of the points I wanted to make with the "Human Echolocation" video is that each person in the audience will react to what they see (the claim) either with belief or disbelief. And it should be natural for people to disbelieve such an extraordinary claim.
- The people presenting the "Human Echolocation" to us as genuine make no effort to *prove* the claim. It is just assumed that we will accept it because it was shown on "CNN" and "TED Talks" wouldn't invite a con-artist on stage.
- If a "normal person" says "but it's backed by research and scientific evidence" then I suppose that person must also believe *everything else* offered to us as "research" and "scientific evidence" (which is absurd - so the person is really just declaring his or her inability to disbelieve a claim they can imagine to be true).
- To your comment on the video (I'll reply there later today) I too don't know whether he has prosthetic eyes or not and your point about his eyes not seeming to water is a good one. He need not be sighted - just have foreknowledge of his surroundings.
- Any of us could get on a bike - close our eyes - and start clicking our tongues haha. That doesn't mean we are using "echolocation" like the bats do haha.
- __________________________________________
- Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's posts, comments, videos and discussions:
- https://pastebin.com/Bfr5RMSg
- Here is Lesta Nediam's Google Plus posts (i.e., blog) - this is where Lesta is most active:
- https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ
- Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's video uploads:
- https://pastebin.com/WV42jUb1
- Here is Lesta Nediam's YouTube channel - for videos about the lie system:
- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
