Vaccine mandates to save their economy

Are you also familiar with your grandparents' reports about the time after World War II, when very painful monetary policy measures were carried out against the backdrop of runaway inflation, war debts and the people who had lost everything? I would like to take a very brief look at the events of that time and then draw the link to our time today.

First there was a currency reform in 1948 [1], in which the Reichsmark became the D-Mark. However, the newly created state immediately used the opportunity to dispose of a large part of its liabilities through the currency reform, as only 6.50 D-Marks were available for 100 Reichsmarks. This applied to everything that was in bank accounts, government bonds, debentures, building society savings and also the assets from life and pension insurance. Liabilities, i.e. loans, and current payments (rents, pensions, etc.), on the other hand, were converted 1: 1 and thus remained in full. In the course of the currency reform in 1948, monetary assets were massively devalued.

Since the currency reform hit savers in particular and had spared property owners, in August 1952 the equalization of burdens [2] for citizens with real assets, especially real estate, was carried out. A burden equalization of 50% was paid to the state on all assets. This enormous financial burden was then paid off to the state in 1/4 annual installments over a period of 30 years. In 1982 the Burden Equalization Act ended with the last installments. Actually…

What does this have to do with Corona and the planned vaccination requirement?

The previous financial system with compound interest repeatedly falls into a trap it has set itself. Capital always shifts to an extremely rich but small group over the years. The rest of the people have to pay interest on this wealth of the super-rich through their labor, but this is becoming more and more difficult because the capital that can be interest-bearing continues to grow. Therefore this system needs a reset every now and then. In the past, wars were very popular for this. In the past, death and suffering were accepted in order to maintain and expand wealth. Why should it be any different today?

Fortunately, there has not yet been a Third World War (in view of the large nuclear arsenals that would be dangerous for the “elites” themselves), but the problem of the financial system persists. Since the 1980s, the deregulation of the financial markets and the emergence of highly speculative derivatives markets made matters worse, as a result of which real capital formation continued to lose ground.

This is how the financial crisis came in 2008. Banks and investors were "saved" by the states. However, at a very high price. In addition to the extreme national debt (for which taxpayers ultimately have to pay for), large sections of the population, especially in Germany, have been partially expropriated by means of a glut of money from the central banks through negative interest rates and extreme increases in the price of assets. The high prices of the properties do not mean that they have become more valuable. The currencies (especially the euro and the US dollar) are simply worth less due to the glut of money. Sooner or later this must lead to a crash. The later the worse.

In 2019 the time had come. In September there was almost another crisis in the financial markets, which would have eclipsed the 2008 financial crisis. The so-called repo market (this is the part of the money market through which banks and hedge funds borrow money from one another) with a worldwide volume of around 15,000 billion euros! had to be bailed out by the US central bank, the Fed, with hundreds of billions of dollars. After all the silverware had been squandered to rescue the banks in 2008 and the associated extreme indebtedness of the states, another crash over global domino effects would have led to chaos. The public hardly noticed this, however. [3]

In my opinion, this triggered the “pandemic” that had long been discussed among the “elites” in order to put the global financial and economic system on a new footing and to protect and further increase the wealth of the super-rich.

The WHO has long been brought in line with a lot of money, including from China and private investors [4], and the member states are obliged by the internationally binding treaty on the International Health Regulations (IHR) to follow the instructions of the WHO, especially in the event of a pandemic Afford. This contract was amended in 2005 in view of the increasing globalization and international spread of infectious diseases such as Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) and came into force on June 15, 2007 [5]. In April 2009 (shortly after the start of the financial crisis) the definition of a pandemic was significantly watered down by the WHO [6]. Previously it took an “enormous number” of deaths worldwide for a pandemic, since then positive test results have been sufficient. The swine flu pandemic was declared on June 11th, 2009. Fortunately, this pandemic has been exposed as completely exaggerated. Even then, the PCR test played an inglorious role. On October 31, 2020, the WHO changed the definition of herd immunity, which in future can no longer be achieved through natural immunity, but only through vaccination [7].

By the way, have you already noticed that the American CDC will no longer allow the PCR test for corona detection from the turn of the year? This cannot reliably differentiate between influenza and corona viruses [8]. Maybe a reason why influenza seems to be extinct? This is only marginally.

In 2010, the Rockefeller Foundation described in its report “Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development” [9] the “lock step” scenario in the event of a flu pandemic. Thought was given to the political and social opportunities and challenges that arise from the fear-inducing pandemic. The result showed that a worldwide lockstep combined with totalitarian measures would be promising to install surveillance states in the wake of the pandemic.

Other elements of our life today were also prepared before Corona, such as a digital vaccination certificate in the EU since 2018 [10] [11]. The Global Vaccination Summit in Brussels on September 12th, 2019 under the patronage of the EU Commission and the WHO [12] is also very informative.


On October 19, 2019, "Event 201" (translated: Event January [20]) took place in New York under the auspices of the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security (founded by the Rockefeller Foundation) and supported by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the World Economic Forum (WEF) [13]. The exercise dealt with the fictional case of a global pandemic triggered by a new type of coronavirus called nCov-19. In addition to the lockdown and travel restrictions, the focus was also on communication in the pandemic and how to deal with fake news.

In the then actually occurring "pandemic" from January 20, the Johns Hopkins University via the Corona Dash Board provides the worldwide figures with which the abolition of fundamental rights is justified worldwide, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation via theirs Investments (including invested in BioNTech since autumn 2019) the vaccines [14] and the World Economic Forum with its founder Klaus Schwab and his book "Covid-19 - The Great Reset" [15] the ideological framework.

However, two changes to the law by the German Bundestag in autumn 2019, also before Corona, are decisive for my contribution: Changes to Article 21 of the Act regulating the Social Compensation Law (Burden Equalization Act) of December 12, 2019 with effect from January 1, 2024 can be found here.

In this amendment, the purpose of "Welfare for War Victims" for which the Burden Equalization Act was created is replaced by the term "Social Compensation" and reference is made to Book Fourteenth of the Social Code, which has also been amended. Amendment to Book 14 of the Social Code (SGB XIV) from November 7th, 2019 with effect from January 1st, 2024. To be found here.

"The new 14th Book of the Social Code (SGB XIV) regulates the compensation of damage-related needs of ... people who have suffered damage to health through a vaccination or other specific prophylaxis measures according to the Infection Protection Act."

So let's summarize briefly: From 01.01.2024 the state can carry out a burden sharing (a nice word for expropriation) in the assets of the entire population for the compensation of victims of vaccination.

The leaked contracts with the vaccine manufacturers state that they have no liability whatsoever [16]. This is the responsibility of those willing to vaccinate, who, with their consent to "the proposed vaccination", bear the risk of participating in this medical experiment. What do you think, why the Covid vaccinations with their only conditional approvals are the only vaccinations where you have to sign something? [17]. Ultimately, you take part in a medical study for which the manufacturer assumes no liability. The victim of the vaccine can only turn to the state and hope for compensation.

A general compulsory vaccination is important for the state, as this is the only way to justify a burden sharing across all citizens. Otherwise everyone who has not been vaccinated could rightly ask why they should be liable for the harm caused to others who voluntarily took the risk of experimental vaccination. In addition, of course, it is also about no longer having an unvaccinated control group, which is actually absolutely necessary for a medical study, but should raise questions about the personal liability of individual protagonists.

For regular approval without specific obligations, the manufacturers of the vaccines must meet further study results and other specific obligations within a certain period of time [18]. The conditional approvals will be renewed on an annual basis until then, in the case of BioNTech / Pfizer, Moderna and AstraZeneca recently done by the EMA.

By the end of 2023 (assuming a cycle of 6 months) each test person / citizen will have received 7 syringes with the experimental gene-based vaccines. Incidentally, that also fits in with the unbelievable quantities of vaccine doses ordered by the EU. At the start of the vaccination campaign, 2.3 billion vaccine doses were ordered, with only around 450 million inhabitants [19], i.e. 5 vaccinations per inhabitant of all ages. In the meantime even more cans have been ordered, including another 1.8 billion cans from BioNTech in May [20]. Anyone who believes that it was that with the current boosters also believes in the asymptomatic patient and the PCR test.


If you take into account the serious side effects of the vaccination up to and including deaths that go beyond all scales for previous vaccines (see graphic based on the American VAERS database), you have to reckon with an extremely high number of vaccine victims and victims in the next few years.

An application for the establishment of a fund for vaccine victims was also submitted to the EU Parliament on September 23, 2021. In this application, the figures from the European Medicines Agency (EMA) regarding the almost 1 million side effects at this point in time are revealing [21]. These numbers are now significantly higher, and the number of unreported cases is also likely to be very high [22].

An enormous number of vaccine victims and deaths should therefore be expected by 2024, which makes the call for a burden-sharing very likely.

It would be conceivable, however, that the compensation is just a pretext and that significantly more money is collected through burden sharing than is actually necessary.

The state also needs the wealth of its citizens for a new currency, the digital euro, which the ECB has officially been working on since this year [23]. The European states (like other western states, especially the USA) are heavily indebted and mostly bankrupt. The property, on the other hand, belongs to the citizens. In order for the digital euro to have any value, the ECB and the countries of the euro area must be forgiven. Against this background, it is not surprising that the EU Commission President Ursula von-der-Leyen is now calling for a Europe-wide vaccination requirement [24]. This could therefore be used as a pretext for expropriations across Europe.

In addition, China will introduce a new digital currency backed by assets in 2022, which is already being tested and is to be launched nationwide for the 2022 Winter Olympics [25]. However, China now has many more assets than western industrialized countries, which will make the currency very strong and the others will be forced to act. According to the will of the Chinese leadership, the e-yuan is to replace the dollar as the reserve currency.

Citizens in the EU and other western countries will soon be ready for currency reform as well. The currently artificially heated inflation (among other things caused by delivery bottlenecks) will continue to pick up speed [26] and cause the gradually impoverished citizens to call for redemption.

The new currency is expected to be a purely digital one with no cash, based on blockchain technology or something similar. This should then be linked as a wallet with a digital identity in the sense of ID2020 [27], the component of which will also be or the basis of the digital vaccination records. As the central bank currency, it is also no longer linked to a bank account, as expected. Every citizen then has his own central bank account with the ECB. Incidentally, the publications by Norbert Häring on this are very informative [28].

So far, of course, there has been no talk of a currency reform with the ECB's project on the digital euro. In addition, it is always emphasized that the digital euro does not want to abolish cash, but didn't it also say until recently that there will never be a compulsory vaccination in Germany?

Using the digital IDs, basic rights can also be linked to the fulfillment of state requirements, as in China with its social scoring system. Today you have to be vaccinated in order to have access to public life. What's coming tomorrow Further medical experiments for Big Pharma, medical measures against overpopulation, blocking the digital wallet for products and services that consume too much CO2, such as meat or travel? The citizen is thus completely open to blackmail. No money and no basic rights in the case of "wrongdoing". And who will still demonstrate if the money tap is turned off as a punishment?

This leads to the expectation of bad things for our freedom and our prosperity. Based on the image that the World Economic Forum draws for the year 2030: “You will not own anything, but you will be happy” [29].

A few more final words to citizens, members of parliament, journalists or judges who think that this is none of their business because they may be able to obtain the coveted vaccination certificate without a syringe through relationships with doctors or their current position. This is still possible because you want to bring as many people as possible into the Covid Pass system without major resistance. But there are already patents for forgery-proof biometric vaccinations, such as the microneedle tattoo of the renowned Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), which was presented on December 18, 2019 [30] [31]. The noose is tightening more and more for everyone. Is that what you want for your children and families? Everyone who participates is complicit.

Quellenangaben:

https://www.bundesbank.de/de/aufgaben/themen/waehrungsreform-1948-614040
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lastenausgleichsgesetz
https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/notes/feds-notes/what-happened-in-money-markets-in-september-2019-20200227.htm
https://www.swr.de/swr2/wissen/who-am-bettelstab-was-gesund-ist-bestimmt-bill-gates-100.html
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internationale_Gesundheitsvorschriften
https://uncutnews.ch/der-impfstatus-ist-nur-voruebergehend-auffrischungen-sind-lebenslang-erforderlich/
https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/herd-immunity-lockdowns-and-covid-19
https://www.cdc.gov/csels/dls/locs/2021/07-21-2021-lab-alert-Changes_CDC_RT-PCR_SARS-CoV-2_Testing_1.html
https://norberthaering.de/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Scenarios-for-the-Future-ofTechnology-and-International-Development.pdf
https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/default/files/vaccination/docs/2019-2022_roadmap_en.pdf
https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/default/files/preparedness_response/docs/ev_20191211_flash_en.pdf
https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/default/files/vaccination/docs/ev_20190912_mi_en.pdf
https://centerforhealthsecurity.org/event201/
https://www.faz.net/aktuell/rhein-main/bill-melinda-gates-foundation-foerdert-biontech-aus-mainz-16372372.html
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/07/covid-19-the-great-reset/
https://de.rt.com/international/121804-pfizers-geheimvertrag-geleakt-vollstandige-immunitat-pharmariese/
https://www.rki.de/DE/Content/Infekt/Impfen/Materialien/Downloads-COVID-19/Einwilligung-de.pdf?__blob=publicationFile
https://www.pei.de/SharedDocs/FAQs/DE/coronavirus/zulassungsprozesse-impfstoff/4-coronavirus-was-ist-bedingte-zulassung.html
https://www.stern.de/politik/ausland/eu-impfkampagne–kosten–mengen-und-lieferzeitraum-der-bestellten-impfstoffe-30359014.html
https://www.zdf.de/nachrichten/politik/corona-eu-biontech-vertrag-impfstoff-100.html
https://www.wochenblick.at/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/ENTSCHLIESSUNGSANTRAG_B-9-2021-0475_DE.pdf
https://reitschuster.de/post/corona-impfung-43-mal-toedlicher-als-grippeimpfung/
https://www.ecb.europa.eu/paym/digital_euro/html/index.de.html
https://www.aerzteblatt.de/nachrichten/129642/Von-der-Leyen-fuer-Pruefung-allgemeiner-Impfpflicht-in-der-EU
https://blockchainwelt.de/e-yuan-kommt-china-forciert-eigene-cbdc/
https://www.tichyseinblick.de/video/tichys-ausblick/inflation-hans-werner-sinn/
https://id2020.org und https://norberthaering.de/die-regenten-der-welt/bundestag-buergernummer/
https://norberthaering.de
https://youtu.be/diGBYDcMjrU
https://news.mit.edu/2019/storing-vaccine-history-skin-1218
https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/38/2d/cb/1bd2b30bd92384/WO2019018301A1.pdf
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nürnberger_Kodex