opdeLegalInvite

Op Approach: When you cannot move a mountain, you go around it

Phase: We are focused on the "top" - those institutions, people, mechanisms with the most power

Required Preliminary Reading if you are to understand our goals and operation: http://roarmag.org/2013/12/heather-marsh-binding-chaos-review/ with https://georgiebc.wordpress.com/category/binding-chaos/ | https://georgiebc.wordpress.com/category/a-stateless-war/ | https://georgiebc.wordpress.com/category/releasing-chaos/ - tl;dr is not acceptable :) See http://youranoncentral.tumblr.com/ for more about how you can help.

Greetings, legal community

Thank-you  for your offer of assistance. I volunteered 3 weeks ago and we are  flying. The goal of the Op is in Stage 1, which is data collection.  There is (surprisingly?) little good, public data that helps us identify  the real reasons for the world-wide, excessive rate of predation. Our  children all over the world are disappearing into abuse. I'm sure you've  read the statistics (all varying in both accuracy and integrity).

We  are trying not to operate with assumptions about the factors that have  led us to this point, but clearly graph the channels that enable and  assist this predation. What one can assume, however, is that there is  something stinky at the top. We are seeing it come out in the United  Kingdom, but they are challenged - as we will be - by poor reporting,  collusion among the players, and a media that is prevented from  investigating all possible avenues.

This  all starts at the top - on the playing fields of Eton, as they said in  another context.  Buggery at boys' private schools, with the associated  physical violence, was all too common among the generation of men that  came to power in the UK in the 80's for example.  Did Epstein made his  money from blackmail? Are there many people blackmailing one another to  shield themselves? Epstein's contention that he worked at Dalton School  is totally implausible if he never got a degree.  Has he been a pimp all  his life?  From his first job in finance until today, there is a web of  hideousness that he created and that protects him.
One  focus for the USA right now is the area of law, which hinders efforts  to truly assist one another as it is complex, obtuse, and open to abuse.  Things do not need to be this difficult. We cannot change law but we  can identify where it is being unhelpful or enables, and track the way  this evolved.

The  legal needs for this effort are not that difficult. We do not plan to  map law - we plan to map the abuse of law as it relates to pedosadism.  We do not care whether something "is" law, we want to know where law  hampers transparency or enables this abuse. It will be impossible to  change the law - there is little interest at the govt. level esp. with  gridlock in congress etc.
Bah...this  is such a large topic, and I have no time for a dissertation. If you  believe, as we do, that there is something seriously wrong in this world  you are welcome to join us.
We  don't do politics - a persons "ism" or orientation is of no concern to  us. We want any corruption or collusion exposed. We do that with  logical, sound data and a Peoples Inquiry and Tribunal.
Specific legal needs:
Someone  knowlegable to organize and interpret the Epstein case information in  preparation for it's entry in the database. It is incredibly annoying to  read all the sensationalized, mis-quoted testimony. We want to know  what is really being said, be able to reference it, and who the players  are. We want the Exhibits (cleansed of personal survivor details), not  the interpretation of them.
Of  primary concern to us is the ability to protect survivors so they are  not further abused as the result of our research. The focus of  investigations is on circumstances and people surrounding the abuse, not  on the survivor. We have designed data protections into the model for  survivors, but would like assurances/guidance about research.

From  there we can investigate both the people and the law to determine how  it failed us. Again, I am not talking about where a case failed legal  rigor (though that may be useful to know as well), I am interested in  exactly what points of law are allowing scum like Epstein off the hook.  For example, the United Kingdom has PIE, we have NAMBLA. Where/how is  law and education being manipulated to allow them to expand?

It is important to recall here that Dersh felt JE should have got a BETTER deal: http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/01/30/conservative-scold-ken-starr-got-a-billionaire-pedophile-off.html

We  had an offer from a "Big Data" person to confer with lawyers and  present some indicators but have not heard back from him. If/when this  occurs, it would be useful to have someone with knowledge - that we  trust - review these analysis factors before incorporating them into the  database design.

The  most pressing need is someone to monitor research efforts to be sure we  are not putting people at unnecessary risk. My request that people  investigating pose questions, not make accusations, is an example. Our  statement that we have no desire to collect illegal data is another.  This operation is not about hacking, it is about data collection that  empowers us.
If  you would like to contribute your PACER account, especially for the  Epstein case files, we would be very grateful. However, people doing  research will also need access to legal files. Activists are not, for  the most part, wealthy. We do this with spare time instead of spare  money. The ability to freely access data for research is a big issue for  us, and it is not practical for us to pay for all these files from  PACER. Suggestions for alternatives would be welcome.

Everyone  gets a certain number of free "accesses" to PACER. "The PACER Service  Center bills quarterly and sends a statement by mail or a notice of  billing email. Fees are waived when usage is less than $15 for the  quarter. Payments may be made on the PACER website (under Manage My  Account), or by calling the PSC at (800) 676-6856 to pay a balance using  VISA, MasterCard, Discover, or American Express. If you pay by check,  please include your account information to ensure that payment is posted  to the correct account. "  If lots of Anons signed up, we could get a  lot for free.

Finally,  we would like encourage more participation from the legal community.  Our conflict with doing this directly is that most survivors have  experienced abuse and/or real and perceived betrayal by the legal system  - as have many of those who call themselves Anonymous. We need outreach  material, and would welcome a team who could dedicate themselves to  that effort. See #DershFrolics.
Our  approach is open and collaborative - there will be no privatizing of  data or research, nor direct monetization of this operation. If anyone  approaches saying otherwise, they are lying. Do not give them one red cent.

I  do not have access to the current database schema - thank all that is  grace, someone else took over the task. But there is a paste of the  legal information we originally considered collecting. It could use  input as well if you decide to help develop OpDeLegal.
Thank-you  for your time. Please send me any questions and replies, and I will get  back to you as soon as I can. I apologize for the impersonal nature of  this one-sided conversation, I am swamped :)

Example of data collection point: https://twitter.com/MorganMorgans40/status/561923922187550721
Epstein pad https://titanpad.com/w56gV81UwZ