When drawing a line on a **static grid** (i.e., a fixed set of discrete points like pixels or cells) that should remain consistent and unchanging, the choice of algorithm depends on your priorities: **efficiency**, **precision**, **simplicity**, or **anti-aliasing**. Below is a comparison of key algorithms for this task:

---

### **1. Bresenham’s Line Algorithm**
**Best for:** Efficient, precise line drawing on integer grids (e.g., pixels).
**Key Features:**
- Uses **integer arithmetic** only (no floating points).
- **Deterministic**: Always produces the same result.
- **Fast**: Optimal for raster graphics (e.g., computer graphics, game development).
- Handles all octants by adjusting direction.

**Pros:**
- No rounding errors or precision issues.
- Minimal computational overhead.
- Ideal for static grids where accuracy is critical.

**Cons:**
- Slightly more complex to implement than DDA.
- Not inherently anti-aliased (though can be extended).

**Example Use Case:**
Drawing a line on a pixel grid in a game engine or image processing tool.

---

### **2. Digital Differential Analyzer (DDA) Algorithm**
**Best for:** Simple, intuitive line drawing with floating-point math.
**Key Features:**
- Uses **floating-point arithmetic** to compute step sizes.
- Iteratively calculates each point along the line by incrementing x and y based on slope.

**Pros:**
- Easy to understand and implement.
- Handles all slopes (including vertical/horizontal).

**Cons:**
- Slower due to floating-point operations.
- Prone to **rounding errors**, which can cause slight variations in line placement.
- Less efficient than Bresenham’s for static grids.

**Example Use Case:**
Educational purposes or prototyping where simplicity is prioritized over performance.

---

### **3. Midpoint Line Algorithm**
**Best for:** A variation of Bresenham’s algorithm with a different decision parameter.
**Key Features:**
- Uses the **midpoint between candidate pixels** to determine the next step.
- Similar efficiency and precision to Bresenham’s but with a different mathematical approach.

**Pros:**
- Equivalent performance to Bresenham’s for static grids.
- Often used in rasterization pipelines (e.g., OpenGL).

**Cons:**
- Slightly more complex than DDA.
- Not inherently anti-aliased.

---

### **4. Anti-Aliasing Algorithms (e.g., Wu’s Algorithm)**
**Best for:** Smoother lines on a grid, but not "non-changing" in the strictest sense.
**Key Features:**
- Uses **alpha blending** or weighted pixel values to reduce jagged edges.
- Produces visually smoother lines at the cost of complexity.

**Pros:**
- Visually superior for high-quality rendering.
- Can be adapted for static grids with precomputed weights.

**Cons:**
- Not "non-changing" in a strict sense (pixel intensities vary).
- Slower and more resource-intensive than Bresenham’s or DDA.

---

### **Comparison Table**

| Algorithm          | Arithmetic   | Precision | Speed  | Anti-Alias? | Best For                        |
|--------------------|--------------|-----------|--------|-------------|----------------------------------|
| **Bresenham**      | Integer      | High      | Fast   | No          | Static grids, efficiency         |
| **DDA**            | Floating     | Medium    | Slow   | No          | Simplicity, prototyping          |
| **Midpoint**       | Integer      | High      | Fast   | No          | Rasterization pipelines          |
| **Wu’s (Anti-Alias)** | Mixed     | Low       | Slow   | Yes         | Visual quality over precision    |

---

### **Recommendation for a "Non-Changing" Grid**
If your grid is **static** and you need the line to be **precise, deterministic, and efficient**, use **Bresenham’s Line Algorithm**. It ensures:
- No floating-point errors.
- Consistent output across different platforms.
- Optimal performance for fixed grids.

For example, in a 2D game where lines (e.g., walls or paths) must remain consistent, Bresenham’s is the standard choice.

---

### **Key Takeaway**
- **Bresenham** is ideal for static grids.
- **DDA** is simpler but less efficient and precise.
- **Anti-Aliasing** adds visual quality but complicates "non-changing" behavior.

Let me know if you need code examples or further clarification!