`Htown|FoFo, first of all, you assume that we are trying to prove the existance of air (Which, as you may or may not know, is just a word that is used to describe the effect of Wind, which is visible through it's force on other things [such as leaves on a tree, etc])

Tell me, where can you provide enough evidence to actually contemplate the existance of a god? you have one source that is nothing more than someone saying that they are a diety and the son of a god. I'd bet my bottom dollar that if someone came up to you tomorrow spouting such nonsense that they are the messiah and god had sent them, you'd be more than willing to confront him with a fist to the face.

Back to my point, where is your evidence that god exists? a book written by humans? a building built by human beings that somehow houses god? are you really so weak minded that you can't stand up and be your own man and call your own shots? you think that god plans your life for you?

What right do you even have to assume that god is real? that's as perposterous as me saying that there is a microscopic teapot floating on the other side of the moon? by your logic, you'd -have- to agree beacause you can't disprove it's existance, right?

i'll break it down for you.

1.All things in existence have a cause.
2. God is uncasued.

It logically follows that:
No God exists

i'll give you a few lines of reprieve to just bathe in your own butthurt.











okay enough of a break, i'll draw this one-sided debate to a close, i have shit to do.

in the words of the great Epicurus:
"Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent."
"Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent."
"Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil?"
"Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?"

i shall break this down further for you.
In the first line, Epicurus states, "Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent." This is a fairly easy one: God is either able to prevent evil, or not.

line two states "Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent." This is, at least in my view, the weakest link because the God of both the new and old testament Bible and the Koran is, in my view, malevolent. Any God that would create Hell for those that refuse to embrace him is very malevolent. Yet, "God" as understood in the traditional context, is indeed seen as all-good, so this is a contradiction, to say the least.

Line three of the riddle states, "Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil?" Now, you are starting to get at the heart of any religious doctrine. God should be both willing and able (according to the religious claims) but evil still exists. Before you get on your high horse that "the devil created evil!, i'd like you to take into account the fact that (according to your faith) god creted everything, and according to your scripture, god created evil, too. "I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the LORD do all these things."(Isaiah 45:7, KJV)

Lastly, the fourth and final line is so compelling, it may even change your life (of you are open minded) "Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?" This is enough to disprove God, in the arena of human reason and logic at least, thousands of years ago. It still works today.

love,
Architecture.

#w70 nigga.