Advance Wars reddit moderator deconstruction

> The new rules have been in place for 2-3 days now.

That is not a 2 week notice in the least.

> The post for which I temporarily banned you for 3 days was made after the new rules were instated.

Banning me at all without banning Gippy or rwbonesy for THEIR crap is bias at its finest.

> The subreddit banner was updated with a link to the rules AND they were posted in the sidebar.

You didn't make that sort of thing clear.

> There has been sufficient warning for this.

No there hasn't.

> I'm also going to ask that you stop referencing old, unrelated posts

Then tell Gippy and rwbonesy the same fucking thing.

> and I'll explain why:

Oh this will be good.

> That post by Margull is over 1 year old which is prior to the instatement of the new rules.

It should have been deemed against the rules from the start.

> The rules will only be applied to comments and posts made day forward.

Again, you're failing to provide a working 2 week notice.

> It is not fair to retroactively apply those rules to other users, yourself included.

And telling Margull somebody reported him so that he could brag simply was fair? It's nothing but bias in favor of big names.

> His reply of a barely readable meme would not quality as severe enough to warrant any action.

Except it's clearly trolling. And oh look, I did exactly as you told me to and not respond while he got reported, and then you used THAT to feed him.

> Rule #2 is not black and white,

Then I shouldn't be banned alone to begin with.

> and it's impossible to establish a perfectly clear set of limits that defines what posts are "too far".

Try a lot of things Gippy and rwbonesy says. Matthew Pyke is rolling in his grave, the AWBW map makers are mocked, and makers of AW Spiritual Successor projects are shot down as cruelly as they are. Those are in addition to the unprovoked attacks on my character.

> Each report is going to be evaluated on a case-by-case basis to determine if something needs to be done.

What you've been doing is laughable when you haven't been leashing the hostile members in the least.

> When you reference the post by Thiediev in your other comment, I locked and deleted that post since I recognized it was not the type of content that this sub needs.

Neither are the personal attacks such as Xenesis's little imitation of Roger Retinz's response to being caught red handed with the bloodied Mr. Reus mask.

> While you may not believe I'm being unbiased,

Then prove you aren't.

> all I can tell you is that I'm doing the best that I can do be.

Again, prove it.

> Your posts have probably been reported the most out of anyone in this subreddit,

Because other people don't report the other users for their hostility.

> but I approve most of them because there's nothing unreasonable.

Doesn't count for much when you're doing the same for the posts by Gippy and rwbonesy.

> This latest post of yours took it too far.

Know what took things too far? The persistent harassment pulled by Gippy and rwbonsey. I haven't forgotten about the Famicom Wars episode where Gippy went as far as to stereotype me as wanting Anti-Air Tanks to deal 0% to land units instead of 170% base to infantry, while simultaneously showing his clear ignorance about things like supplying not working on already moved units, ignorance that I could correct him on, but oh right, he's hellbent on mocking me.

The conversation flow alone proves Gippy's crap should have been curbed.

> If you'd like my opinion on the matter, take the time to review your post and ask yourself the following: (snip)

Have other people ask that stuff first or else your rules are nothing but hollow hypocrisy.

> Since the ban your were given was only temporary, that is already pretty fair.

It's only fair if you ban Gippy and rwbonesy too.

> Threatening me

You mean threatening to report your corruption is bad? It shows you're unfit to be the subreddit's moderator.

> is one of the worst ways to show that you want to be a member of this community.

Why? Because the community wants to subscribe to hive-minded garbage?

> If you think other users are violating one of the rules, report the post and ignore the comment;

Which is what I did before. The Margull incident proves how you'll abuse THAT.

> replying has only escalated the frustration.

Then do not reply to posts like Margull's to feed him.

Seriously, drop the pretense that you're fair. You're not.