Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up,
it unlocks many cool features!
- Q (iMalFect) : Are there any plans for improving the soliditypp visual studio code extension? The "debugger" does look kinda old-style and I think you should do something like Ethereum Remix, would be easy to develop smart contracts like these. Also, can we expect an easy-to-see information when transaction is reverted? We have to click the "more" icon to see that the transaction has been reverted
- A (Mike) : Yes, the debugger is actively being worked on (not by me). The next iteration will be a lot nicer (so it looks like, I haven't tried it yet)
- ----
- Q (iMalFect) : Also, is there any chance we'll see the debugger on JetBrains IDE's?
- A (Mike) : Very low chance we'll have a jetbrains debugger, I think we're focusing mainly on vs code
- ----
- Q (iMalFect) : Also, are there any plans on fixing the documentation? I've reported some problems December 2021, and well. You didn't fix it yet.
- A (Mike) : Yes, we have an internal doc that goes through a review by @Allen | Vite before publishing for the public. Maybe your suggestion got lost somehow, not sure. I think we should streamline that workflow
- ----
- Q (iMalFect) : May I see the new documentation? Happy to check it out, were the older docs reviewed by anyone?
- A (Mike) : If the "new" docs are not published yet, they are still in our private repo
- ----
- Q (iMalFect) : By the way, how much % of the supply is currently held by ViteLabs
- A: Waiting for Richard's reply
- ----
- Q (iMalFect) : Oh by the way, may I see the current list of active ViteLabs Gitcoin bounties? Wanted to complete something but still see the ones that were completed. eg. VitePay
- A (Mike) : Thanks for bringing this up a second time. I will work with Gitcoin and make sure that this list is all up to date.
- ----
- Q (iMalFect) : Anyways, are there any plans to "dynamically" grow Vite? we've been kinda going "downstairs", 0.10$ => 0.02$ (obviously not gonna complain about the price, that's the market) also haven't seen much new in Vite itself recently
- A (Mike) : We're talking internally about how to grow the NFT usage on Vite. Vite's unique architecture gives us an opportunity to improve the UX of NFTs on other chains
- ----
- Q (iMalFect) : True, also I know this is probably unrelated to y'all so sorry, but do you know what has happened to VitePunks
- A (Mike) : For Vite Punks, I'm not sure what their progress is. I'm not involved in their development
- ----
- Q (iMalFect) : By the way, are you guys working on an NFT marketplace? It's true that Vite is an awesome platform for NFT's due to no fees.
- A (Mike) : That's something we're discussing internally. There are a lot of directions it could go in
- ----
- Q (iMalFect) : Who's working on the Vite mobile app?
- I feel like it's been kind of "ignored", nothing new recently.
- When can we expect dark mode in the Vite app?
- A (Mike) : That's for @Blackey | Vite to decide. My work is focused on the ViteBridge frontend, Vite Express, and our upcoming wallet extension
- ----
- Q (iMalFect) : Also, are you guys planning on helping promising vite projects grow by giving them funds to list on exchanges, and etc.?
- A (Mike) : We've talked about that and are considering it, I think it will happen, I'm just not sure for which projects
- ----
- Q: Whats prioritized right now? (KaffinPX)
- A (Mike) : We just hired a new dev @jplew who will be ramping up NFT stuff on Vite. Wes is working on OpenZeppelin compatibility, I'm working on a lot of frontend stuff, the other devs are doing stuff with ViteBridge and the core protocol
- KaffinPX : Thats definitely not a good prioritization
- Firstly - Assets are native on Vite, NFTs should be native too because staking for all of NFT contracts will be pain
- Mike (Vite) : Yes we are talking about native NFTs
- KaffinPX : Secondly- Improvement of core protocol should start with economics of Vite.
- Like currently contract creation fee is constant, it should be based on contracts size + as example Vites supplys 0.0001% so can increase with inflation. Same thing with token minting fees
- Mike (Vite) : Good idea, idk if we'll change existing fees, but there will definitely be more burn mechanisms with native NFTs, as an example
- KaffinPX : Next thing- If contract drains all quota, all receivable txs should fail otherwise it creates a way to make network spam itself
- Mike (Vite) : Yeah, that's another thing I've seen talked about internally. I don't work with the Go codebase though, so can't talk much more about spam prevention
- KaffinPX : Also maybe a backdoor on next hard fork for burning VitogeSBP LMAO
- Mike (Vite) : I think we're trying to build an dapp ecosystem that applies the rules fairly/transparently to everyone, so doubt this will happen lol
- KaffinPX : And Finally-Move ViteX admin controls to a Multisig contract&wallet, also when governance system, You vote by VITE for proposals, For creating a proposal you need to lock some Vite(Maybe 10k Vite), if you get VETOd your Vite gets burned
- Mike (Vite) : This isn't on our bucket list yet, or maybe ever. It sounds like something you could build tho
- KaffinPX : So can control Vite variables, Like constant fees of ViteX
- Mike (Vite) : Vite isn't at the scale yet where that tool would be warranted
- ----
- Q (KaffinPX) : When first metaverse on Vite?
- A (Mike) : idk, but it'd be cool if we had an mmorpg that used Vite's native assets (and potentially native nfts)
- Q2 (KaffinPX) : Wen supporting first metaverse project of Vite lmao
- A2 (Mike) : When a legit team asks Vite Labs for a grant I guess lol
- (KaffinPX) : Thats very complicated
- Vitelabs requests video chats for everything
- (Mike) : Oh, yeah that's a new policy. It really weeds out the ppl who aren't serious
- (KaffinPX) : Also weeds out the people who are serious
- Thats not best way to filter projects
- (Mike) : Possibly, we could always change. Just trying new things out.
- ----
- Q (KaffinPX) : Also some technical suggestions - Stop webpacking Vite.js after installation, it makes harder to debug problems
- A (Mike) : Ikr, that's another thing we have to work on. we'll probably switch to esbuild
- ----
- Q (KaffinPX) : Another thingy- PRIZE scam on ViteX, Vitelabs can hide pairs on frontend but they dont, why?
- A (Mike) : doing that kind of stuff is controversial, so we avoid taking that kind of action. Seems like a lose-lose situation imo
- (KaffinPX) : But VITOGE pairs?
- (Mike) : idk, but my time is better spent coding and building stuff than making a decision on censorship.
- ----
- Q (KaffinPX) : Also any news from VitePassport extension? lol
- A (Mike) : It's very close to being publicly released. Still testing/reviewing it internally
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment