Grieve

First, ask him if he looked at the stuff you linked or The Alternative Hypothesis. The answer is likely no.

Now the list of grievances and the impression they leave

The impression I am consistently given is one of no charity. Something you demand from others and boldly state the importance of. But you don't give it. And this predated any twitter fights to be quite honest.

1. Moralistic posturing alone is not an argument because it's not actually in any way dealing with reality. You can lament collectivism or whatever nonsense you made up to disparage our ideas but the fact is that you really don't have an answer that isn't "do equality right". That's simply not possible because nobody agrees on what is fair and you did absolutely nothing to attack the fundamental lie upon which these grabby grievance groups justify themselves.

Neither is deferring to "culture" as being the source of group differences of any worth. It's never justified or explained, it's like the god in the Gaps argument, a tactical retreat. Whereas a genetic argument explains the gaps and even the cultural differences as well as having more empirical evidence behind it.

2. I have never, ever seen any of you go after our original content beyond the odd Dailystormer article. And even then you rarely attack the content, rather you attack the way they present it

3. Instead your energy is invested in fighting with anon twitterati rather than content creators. To put it another way, this would be like me debating your audience.
And tbh even then you don't do a stellar job. You usually miss the point or seemingly willfully misunderstand the point (eg using fascist as a descriptor doesn't necessarily mean a reference to the political philosophy, its meaning has clearly evolved beyond that)

TO be honest, they've made your leader break down and post interracial gay porn. He says he did it for a lark but really he was losing an argument with the altright, notably therightstuff.biz's twitter account @tharightstuff. This attempt at face-saving suggests an inability to be honest with one's own shortcomings.

4. Running away from the Alternative Hypothesis to me suggests that you guys would flounder in the face of our original content, that being why you avoid it. Sargon, Vernaculis, and jeff Holiday all being guilty of this but at least the first two have the good sense to not arrogantly bluster on social media.

5. Quite frankly this habit of selectively going after some voices to give the allusion that you're quelling us is what the MSM does, does it not? It's dishonest, and done so by omission. And to illustrate the issue with this I would point out that Thunderf00t's fans believed his lies about Lauren Southern being altright. That's the kind of audience you pander to, and it is having the desired effect.

6. Never reigned in Spino lying about MillennialWoes

Ultimately this Rational Skeptic™ label is just a pretentious larp on your part. Everyone thinks they are rational and skeptical. And like in your case, it's usually wrong.

Sargon, interestingly, is pulling his hair out trying to factionalize you. And he is right. He was inspired by us, he indicated as much in a Rubin interview by talking about how small we are compare to the mark we've made.

He's also, as per his Milo video, adopted the Dont Punch Right standard. Basically he doesnt denounce or disavow because the SJWs say he should. DPR is the same, not being salami-tacticed because of deference to the Left's moral authority especially when they never do it themselves