10 Lesta Nediam LNC2016-03-11 1640 +123456789123456789 12345

Lesta Nediam LNC2016-03-11 1640 +123456789123456789 123456789
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nObGH71j3z4&google_comment_id=z13awlwourzxwfbsn23jcpny4kepdpbum
https://pastebin.com/bjYmNJG6
__


+123456789123456789 123456789 __ Slow down. You are saying that the people who in your mind are permanently staffing a *centabillion dollar micro/zero-gravity research facility* that orbits the Earth up to 16 times a day *cannot film the footage that would necessarily prove they are in a permanent micro/zero-gravity environment because of "crappy cameras"?!?!?!*



Hahaha ::sad face::



*Haven't you seen the huge as crikey cameras attached to the walls of the "ISS"?* Don't you know about the amazing cameras which are used to purportedly take stunning photos of the Earth below?



*But yet we are to accept that they have access only to crappy and glitchy cameras for everything else?!*



::sadder face::



You did not read what I wrote to you above. You did not pay attention to the part where I mentioned you would invent "plausible explanations" (i.e., "excuses") *that are limited only by your natural intelligence and imagination?*



On the one hand you are saying "the footage is glitchy because of 'crappy cameras'" but on the other hand you must surely acknowledge that there do exist HD cameras.



*Out of the hundreds of billions of dollars allegedly spent on the "ISS" they cannot afford a decent camera with which to film a few minutes of somersaults (etc.) that's free from glitches, cuts, edits and pans?!?!*



__



By the way, I cannot address every triviality you bring up. It is too time-consuming. *You must focus on the issue at hand which is the absence of sustained duration genuine micro/zero-gravity footage that upon scrutiny remains free from glaring glitches, clever cuts, sneaky edits and misdirecting pans.*



To talk about anything else is to introduce irrelevancies. I will deal with the one you bring up but I cannot entertain any more of them. Stay focused.



__



You asked: _"not one person involved in the ISS has talked"?_



Why would you ever expect anyone to talk?! Who would they tell? Who would believe them?! How would they prove it? Would YOU believe an "astronaut" if he said "I was lying about being in space"? _Or would you think he had more simply lost his marbles?!_



*Would you expect a criminal lawyer to start blabbing to others that he is defending guilty people?*



You have no expectation of that. Why would you ever expect "astronauts" to talk? For someone to talk they must have an incentive to talk. *I strongly suggest that the "astronauts" are more involved than we are permitted to think.*



If it is being faked then of all people THEY ALONE KNOW IT. That means they are not just "random people". That means they are more likely the project leaders or "event planners" and not merely "workers".



(I have written about a "surprise birthday" analogy but that will mean nothing to you and I am mentioning it here for the benefit of other people who are aware of it.)



The "astronauts" who talk to us from aboard the alleged "ISS" *are active in the deception and not passive.* And so it is no surprise that we would come to learn that "astronauts" are selected. *That is a misdirection.* Everything about the "ISS" and the "astronauts" is like a magic show.



Every child wants to be an "astronaut" (who didn't?!) and so how to manage that expectation? *You simply take it out of their control.* That no matter how hard you work and study - the ultimate decision is out of your hands.



If the "ISS" is being faked then there must be expectation management and that is exactly what we see. No matter how much you may be made of the "right stuff" in the end you must be "selected" after *many years.*



Again - that does not mean every "astronaut" who is in the "selection process" is "in on it". Only (necessarily) those who end up aboard the "ISS". There may be a large number of candidates who believe it is real (and I will return to that point in a moment).



__



You have simply not looked into this. By being "selected" it makes it seem as though the "astronaut" is "answering the call of duty" rather than being an instigator ("project planner").



If the "astronaut" is lying then to be sure the "astronaut" never speaks would require some set of circumstances to ensure it. That they are the "project planner" is how. It is obvious that the "ISS" is a propaganda platform used to impress beliefs upon children and to excite imaginations. And so the "astronaut" would believe that a "small lie" (about being in space) is worth it for the "greater good" if it results in children doing better at school and working harder.



What "astronaut" would "blow the whistle" and ruin such a good thing if their very reason for lying in the first place was to inspire children?!



__



How many people do you imagine would need to be involved, anyway? In your mind you are probably thinking "thousands" or even "millions" (as I saw one twit talk about).



>>> *The only people who absolutely need to know it isn't real are the "astronauts" themselves and whomever is involved in the video editing process.* <<<



_That's it._



All in all not many people need to be involved. Dozens of people - if that - in addition to the actual "astronauts" who have been aboard the "ISS".



Out of an alleged population of 7+ billion even if 100 or 1,000 people were involved in total it is not even a tiny fraction of a small drop in a very large ocean.



You haven't thought any of this through.



You have approached me the way you have because you just "know" it's "real and stuff".



Just because there are "conspiracy theorists" who also appear to reject the "ISS" does not mean I am like them. They reject the "ISS" for the wrong reasons. Their ultimate purpose is to drive people to belief about the "ISS" because people like yourself conclude "but they are wrong about X, Y and Z therefore the 'ISS' must be real".



I have nothing to do with those people or anyone else here on YouTube.



__



Even though I have pointed these things out to you I am sure it will have no impact. You will just focus on the next thing. You will continually shift the goal posts because you are in denial. *You do not want me to be right about this.*



__



Absolutely everyone else (at "NASA" or "ESA" or any other "space agency") can remain in full belief that the "ISS" is real and manned.



*"NASA" and pals can be staffed with genuine people who believe there is a real and manned "ISS".*



In fact - what I have to say about the alleged "ISS" can tell us nothing whatsoever about the rest of what "NASA" does. That all remains separate.



If there is no real and manned "ISS" then it does not follow that there would automatically be no satellites or anything else. That is all a separate issue and is not my focus.



(Certainly, the people who work on the "NASA" website do not need to be in on it haha.)



What I see from you is common and typical. *You are in denial.* You just "KNOW" that the "ISS" is "real" and so you are baffled that someone like me would not share your belief.



*Well, once upon a time I did. In fact - only until about a year ago I shared your belief.* A belief in a real and manned "ISS" is the culture's default belief and I too thought it was preposterous to doubt it.



_Until I looked into it._



What I know is that you can only feel certain about the "ISS" just so long as you don't look too deeply into it.