Advertisement
Guest User

Untitled

a guest
Mar 18th, 2019
61
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 2.94 KB | None | 0 0
  1. Originally Posted by Asgardian View Post
  2. Manifesto: http://s000.tinyupload.com/index.php...29517806423572
  3.  
  4.  
  5. Summary:
  6.  
  7. --No, he wasn't just living what he was taught. He became disgusted by the mass invasions of other nations and erosion of other cultures by Islamic peoples. Particularly, his travels through Europe (France, specifically) affected him deeply.
  8.  
  9. --No political affiliations of note. Supports Trump as a "symbol of white reemergence" but disgusted with him as a policy maker.
  10.  
  11. --Is not "racist" in the sense most of us would use the word. A paraphrased quote, "I have no problem with a Jew in Israel." He has no problem with any culture or race, and acknowledges a fondness, appreciation and almost a begrudged admiration of other cultures (and spoke highly of his experiences traveling and visiting them). He only considers those that migrate to our nations and do things that erode our culture and identity.
  12.  
  13. --He wants diversity through segregation. (i.e. what's so special about any of us if we're all mutts?)
  14.  
  15. --As for why he killed the children too: They will grow to be invaders. "Would you rather kill them or have to send your children/grandchildren to do it?"
  16.  
  17. --His goal: To create such a reaction from the invaders and their allies and the "traitors" supporting them, that everyone else who either quietly supports his view or has doubt about his views sees his view as truth. Also, to spur further debate in America about 2nd amendment so the gun-grabbers will become more aggressive about it. Then, those of us who say "we'll kill you before you take them" are forced to put up and take our nation back or shut the fuck up and die out like the cowards we are. Also, the fact that the invading peoples tend to align with the grabber movement more, he hopes that issue will be dealt with as well.
  18.  
  19. --Why violence vs. democracy? After the French election a few years back, he lost hope that anyone with sense to see what he sees would ever do anything about it; also, he's very adamant about fertility rates. White/European nations are breeding at such a low rate in comparison to other cultures/races that they will out-breed us until we don't exist. He believes that it's already far too far along to curb that peacefully and that this sort of combative action is the only way to really ensure white survival.
  20.  
  21.  
  22.  
  23. All in all, you may not like it, you may think it's detestable, you may wholeheartedly disagree with him on all those counts... but, after reading it, you can't objectively say the guy's just some wacko nutcase... His arguments are well worded, pretty logical if you assume some basic accuracy to his premises, and not in any way the incoherent thoughts/ramblings you'd expect.
  24.  
  25. Regardless how I feel about the act itself, I'm stuck with a bit of admiration. If these are his honest thoughts (and what the fuck does he have to gain by lying?), the man isn't necessarily a psycho, just determined to the extent of desperation with integrity to match.
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement