API tools faq
paste
Lesta

22 Lesta Nediam LNC2016-11-09 0200 +nationalparksign

Lesta
Nov 8th, 2016
62
0
Never
Add comment
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 4.50 KB | None | 0 0
raw download clone embed print report
  1. Lesta Nediam LNC2016-11-09 0200 +nationalparksign
  2. https://plus.google.com/108131621397475586556/posts/ELGoA8Y9qvW
  3.  
  4. __
  5.  
  6. +nationalparksign __ *This is a very useful video*! (I'll probably end up posting about it.) Yes - the footage isn't "clean" in that it does appear to have several *sneaky edits* which would disqualify it from being accepted as "sufficient proof".
  7.  
  8. I.e., if this was a genuine incident and that was genuine CCTV footage of it then the "sufficient proof" *has been crippled* so that "doubt suppression training" takes place.
  9.  
  10. Furthermore - _and this is the main point_ - we are told the gentleman is "doing just fine". *It certainly does not look like he would be doing okay*! There is no way to believe *that assertion about reality* without having to trust the story teller.
  11.  
  12. So I would view it like this:
  13.  
  14. A genuine and shocking incident can occur (honey to attract the ants) and then an assertion about reality is made ("he is doing fine") which can only be accepted on trust.
  15.  
  16. The lie system achieves the same effect (training the population to accept lies when presented as truth) and it f_kcs with the heads of those who run around calling "everything a hoax".
  17.  
  18. If the footage is accepted as genuine *then the claim made with it certainly cannot*. This is not a new tactic/strategy from the lie system - *_just a variation on the same theme_*.
  19.  
  20. As much as possible the lie system will show us truth and genuine events but in a crippled way that forces us to accept some claim about it on trust etc.
  21.  
  22.  
  23.  
  24.  
  25. __________
  26.  
  27. +nationalparksign __ The whole thing is very doubtable to us because we know what to look for but it would be undoubtable (and the footage "smooth as butter") to all the "normal people" watching inattentively at home.
  28.  
  29.  
  30.  
  31. When looking at an event always ask: *"What part of this claim am I expected to believe on trust as true because it lacks sufficient proof?"*
  32.  
  33.  
  34.  
  35. With lie system events and claims there will always be something. Even if it's a small line at the end of the video: _"And he lived happily ever after with the woman who ran him over"_.
  36.  
  37.  
  38.  
  39. By relentlessly focusing on the absence of sufficient proof as we are *it can force the lie system to adapt and present a variation on the theme*. (So that people can turn to us and say: "But we DO get shown sufficient proof!" - _not quite!_)
  40.  
  41.  
  42.  
  43. As I've mentioned - what we're presented with here is a simple variation on a theme (if we were to accept the footage as qualifying sufficient proof).
  44.  
  45.  
  46.  
  47. I.e., most people will see that the guy "clearly got run over" and *if you question the video in any way* you're an auto-"conspiracy nutter". But these people do not realise that the true "payload" of the alleged news item is to simply put into your mind the *unjustified belief* that he's "doing just fine".
  48.  
  49.  
  50.  
  51. *Which means trusting the story teller who can easily be lying about it*.
  52.  
  53.  
  54.  
  55. The "normal person" saw something "real" and so is ready to accept the claim about the guy being "okay" (besides - "why would they lie about it?!").
  56.  
  57.  
  58.  
  59. The boundaries of "what's possible in reality" are pushed/stretched - but not to extreme absurdity (for him to get up and ride away would be unbelievable).
  60.  
  61.  
  62.  
  63. Instead the audience has this thought: "Wow.. I did not EXPECT that he would have survived BUT HE DID."
  64.  
  65.  
  66.  
  67. Thus training people to not trust their own instincts/expectations about even the most obvious of things! (Training: If the experts say X happened but X to me seems very unlikely - then I must be wrong and X did happen.)
  68.  
  69.  
  70.  
  71. The "normal person" will also go on to invent plausible explanations to justify the claim at the end of the video: _If he were dead then why would they fuss about putting him on a stretcher like they did?!_
  72.  
  73.  
  74.  
  75. It's all belief-training. *It's all about getting the population to accept lies when they are presented as truth*. And it requires a lot of repetition - over and over - and each generation must be trained accordingly!
  76.  
  77.  
  78.  
  79. (Anyway - you know how it goes!)
  80.  
  81.  
  82.  
  83.  
  84. ______________________________________________________________
  85. My name is Lesta Nediam and I am cracking reality like a nut.
  86.  
  87. Lesta Nediam's YouTube Channel:
  88. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w
  89.  
  90. Lesta Nediam's Google Plus:
  91. https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ
  92.  
  93. Lesta Nediam's Twitter:
  94. https://twitter.com/LestaNediam
  95.  
  96. Lesta Nediam's Public Comments:
  97. https://pastebin.com/u/Lesta
  98.  
  99. What does not exist - exists to exist.
  100. What exists - exists to always exist.
  101. As it is written - so it is done.
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Public Pastes
We use cookies for various purposes including analytics. By continuing to use Pastebin, you agree to our use of cookies as described in the Cookies Policy.  OK, I Understand
Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!