han and Stung_` reveal themselves to be objectionable human beings

han
that's why you have to codify everything into law
han
because you get fuckers like him min-maxing things
han
you'd expect better from a president, but here we are.
dk58 has left IRC (Ping timeout: 496 seconds)
infspire
It's not possible to codify everything into law.
infspire
I think it's reasonable to conclude law is a fractal with an infinite amount of recursive sub-cases. Of course, we can approximate that structure with something more tractable, but then we also have to factor in dynamic considerations, too.
han
k
infspire
I'll put you on ignore for your response of 'k', since it seems intentionally passive-aggressive.
infspire
Let's do three weeks.
Stung_`
coding some things as purely ministerial is quite easily done
Stung_`
and even the GSA head suggested to do that
16:22 infspire
IF there is anybody in here interesting in learning something: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2157804
Stung_`
so I agree with han
infspire
Define an inappropriate rule as a rule that, if followed literally, would in at least some cases produce results that can be concluded with reasonable certainty to have been unintended by and unacceptable to even the rule’s author. Even under this definition, it is impossible for a rule writer to write an appropriate and objective rule to cover every situation in advance. Rule-writers nonetheless act today as though the
infspire
y were unaware of this long-acknowledged impossibility of perfect advance enumeration, and their persistent attempts to achieve it have imposed enormous, under-recognized costs on regulated populations.
Stung_`
nah learning is for someone else
Stung_`
:)
Stung_`
some things can be anticipated.
Stung_`
it's not "because you can't have it 100%, you can't have it 80%"
Stung_`
That's a Utopian Fallacy
infspire
Stung_`: I literally addressed this in my opening statement.
infspire
"Of course, we can approximate that structure with something more tractable, but then we also have to factor in dynamic considerations, too."
Stung_`
I literally didn't give a fuck
infspire
I put you on ignore, of course, for that post, as it's entirely indefensible.
infspire
Computing ignore duration.
infspire
Three months.
infspire
It's wild to me that there are people on the internet who think that kind of speaking is going to work.
Stung_` has changed mode: +b *!*@c-71-193-10-61.hsd1.ca.comcast.net
infspire
I do recall when I was young -- before Trumpism really -- that I would somewhat engage people who said dumb things in some attempt to help them see they said a dumb thing.
You have been kicked out of the channel
Stung_` has kicked infspire (Your projection is showing brah.)