Sphinx and Anunnaki

IMO the Aztecs and Egyptians were culturally connected more than 12,000 years ago. Hence the Egyptian anomaly in the Grand Canyon and the Aztec story of a disaster that sent them fleeing from, presumably, the Grand Canyon, and into Mexico where we Europeans later met them.

Then look into all of those major figures of antiquity having red hair, from America to Asia to Africa to Europe. It's a long list but includes kings and prophets from all over the world. These red hair kings are supposedly the Nephilim's spawn.

The crocodile kings of Egypt = Anunnaki, specifically the lineage of Enki, who is described as a feathery serpent man and is often conflated with Satan from the Bible and Prometheus from Greek mythos (and so on --- some connections are more striking than others).

To me it's painfully obvious that the Sphinx was built pre-flood cataclysm, hence its massive water erosion. Dating it at least 10,000 years, more likely ~13,000. Some estimate as far back as the celestial cycle before that, placing it some 25,000+ years back; but the water erosion better supports the 10-13kya hypothesis. Which, A) puts a megalithic society before the supposed dawn of civilization (lol fake bullshit modern science agendas) and B) puts Jesus and Cleopatra drastically closer to our era than the era of the Sphinx.

The Egyptian priesthood told Solon (iirc, forebearer of Plato who recorded the story of Atlantis from Egypt) that the Atlantis records were only the most recent civilization/era to pass, and that they had records going back (again, iirc), 400,000 years. These kings were "gods" who lived for thousands of years.

And funny how that lines up almost perfectly with the story of human creation by the Anunnaki; estimated to be around that very same time period ~400,000 years ago.

However, the Anu people were here on Earth millions of years before that, hence the various million year old OoPArts (Out of Place Artifacts).

Humanity being genetically engineered by a reptilian sub-family of the Anunnaki only makes sense considering the countless serpent priest clans going back to prehistory.

Note that "reptilian" is relative; calling Anunnaki "reptilian" is like calling an android a "primate". It's usefully descriptive but limited by human preconception.

PS. Mauro Biglino has a few hours worth of lectures breaking down the boat plagiarism of the Old Testament and Genesis, showing striking references to the Sumerian origin story when the OT is translated literally from Hebrew.

I mean, it would be NICE if aliens landed on the Whitehouse lawn and held a press conference. But we only need to look at history and make corroborations/comparisons to know that the "aliens" have been here all along.

"Why" things are one way and not another, why we don't get the instant satisfaction of an easily digestible answer, etc., is anyone's guess. It's definitely a deeply multi-faceted issue.

I can't tell if disclosure is a football both sides (of politics) are trying to run down the field to "win the game", or if it's more like a hot potato, where no one wants to hold onto it long enough to get burned.

Maybe our ignorance keeps us safe?

I don't have a definitive conclusion on the "why", but unless our lives are at stake, then I will not die content without having all these questions (and then some) answered to my satisfaction.

And I'm not about to make excuses for the ones hiding the truth, as if they're protecting us. Though I'm sure that's what they tell themselves to sleep at night.