Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up,
it unlocks many cool features!
- Damien Albus Drake's Testimony
- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
- My Rebuttal
- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
- Cross Examination
- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
- > I must apologize to my assistant, but unfortunately for them they are incorrect.
- > First of all, the murder happened at 12:30 PM, but I was working with my assistant at the time. They should've known this.
- > Of course, the murder was caused by poison, but we don't know when it was administered.
- > Furthermore, it could have been put into the body with magic, and not a physical source.
- > After all, just because the locked room wasn't made by magic, doesn't mean magic wasn't used in the crime.
- > More importantly, let's talk about the golden statue for a minute. That was what was said to be the motive someone would have to kill the victim.
- > But...it was in a special case, and only the defendant knew the code. After all, how could anyone else know that?
- > Furthermore, the defendant made special mention in this trial to say that they made sure no one else knew before this trial. Personally, I have to agree.
- > And even if I somehow did know that - which is impossible by the way - it still leaves one major problem. Actually two.
- >First off, why would I need to steal it? I can't use magic so it's properties would be useless to me, and I make quite enough as is.
- > Second, how could I move it without getting caught? Surely at least someone would have noticed.
- > In other words, only someone with magic, or someone who knows the blindspots in the security could have known that.
- > Which means one thing very clear: The killer is someone who either works there, has been there before, or is one of students.
- > In other words, I am completely innocent, and my assistant should be ashamed at their false accusations.
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment