Advertisement
Lesta

7 Lesta Nediam LNC2016-01-20 0945 +King Lynceus

Jan 19th, 2016
55
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 2.71 KB | None | 0 0
  1. Lesta Nediam LNC2016-01-20 0945 +King Lynceus
  2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=he8wh88iK-o&lc=z12ajtjwwwq0g3u2e22xyjb4bzbec5aie04
  3. https://pastebin.com/afcT6AX7
  4. __
  5.  
  6.  
  7. +King Lynceus __ [This is quickly typed - forgive me!] If the laugher was added in to mask what he had said and it was pre-recorded then why not do a second take? << We certainly would expect a second take but it could also be due to a limitation of how the trick was done in the first place.
  8.  
  9.  
  10.  
  11.  
  12.  
  13. Perhaps the "presenter" had recorded himself reading the script and it was recorded only one time (thus no access to a second take).
  14.  
  15.  
  16.  
  17.  
  18.  
  19. Perhaps the problem wasn't noticed until too late in the production process.
  20.  
  21.  
  22.  
  23.  
  24.  
  25. Then again - it gives us a reason to doubt. And anyone who watches the "webstream" but does not notice anything unusual and doesn't start to doubt what they are watching has wittingly or unwittingly suppressed a potential doubt (this is what I call "doubt suppression training").
  26.  
  27.  
  28.  
  29.  
  30.  
  31. There are many reasons why it would be included but the key point is that *if it's a LIVE stream then what we see is not possible!*
  32.  
  33.  
  34.  
  35.  
  36.  
  37. Or- if it's possible - it would require *an elaborate and complex explanation* which is unlikely. *The people who will give us an elaborate and complex explanation* (the people who DENY DENY DENY and never acknowledge ANYTHING is an oddity or anomaly) *will be the same people who routinely invoke "Occam's Razor" to reject any "conspiracy claim"!*
  38.  
  39.  
  40.  
  41.  
  42.  
  43. (They literally want to have their cake and eat it too!)
  44.  
  45.  
  46.  
  47.  
  48.  
  49. [This reply was very quickly typed - I might add another reply later to give a better explanation of what I mean by "a limitation of the trick" and "doubt suppression training" but the main thing was to point out that there are good reasons as to why we would even see this seeming "editing glitch"]
  50.  
  51.  
  52.  
  53.  
  54.  
  55. If it was pre-recorded (as it really does seem to be - as that best explains the phenomena we can observe) then we should not necessarily/always expect a flawless/perfect recording - as there are probably limitations that they are working with [such as having to work within the limitations of perception management]!)
  56.  
  57.  
  58.  
  59. __________________________________________
  60. Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's posts, comments, videos and discussions:
  61. https://pastebin.com/Bfr5RMSg
  62.  
  63. Here is Lesta Nediam's Google Plus posts (i.e., blog) - this is where Lesta is most active:
  64. https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ
  65.  
  66. Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's video uploads:
  67. https://pastebin.com/WV42jUb1
  68.  
  69. Here is Lesta Nediam's YouTube channel - for videos about the lie system:
  70. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement