jklioe reqs talk

[14:25] jklioe: you guys probably should have lowered the min game threshold
[14:25] jklioe: but not necessarily the gxe
[14:26] +5gen: yeah that's probably what should be done next time
[14:33] jklioe: yeah
[14:33] jklioe: and we don't need to lower gxe necessarily
[14:33] jklioe: and we probably shouldn't anyway
[14:34] jklioe: i lot of people liekd the lower minimum game requirement in the pyroar suspect as opposed to kingler suspect because it still did its job in being exclusive while being less of a headache to grind for the established players
[14:37] +5gen: ~35 games is ideal imo
[14:37] +5gen: doesn't drag it out and it still would give a player an idea of the suspect
[14:38] +5gen: and besides ppl can always play more games
[14:51] jklioe: yeah, anywhere between 30-35 is fine imo
[14:51] jklioe: since right now zu reqs is harder than the reqs of other tiers
[14:51] jklioe: given our unique ladder situation
[14:51] jklioe: since if we lose, we lose way more gxe on average given our higher chances of battling the lower ranks
[14:53] +5gen: that's the main issue
[14:54] +5gen: would rather reduce the likelihood of not attaining the gxe
[14:55] jklioe: we don't want to lower GXE as much since we won't be achieving our goal as intended, which is filtering out the less good players. the problem isn't acutally getting 79%, it's more maintaining it with the game requirement that we have
[14:55] +5gen: just b/c naturally you have more chances to lose with 40 games than 30
[14:56] +5gen: yeah i agree
[14:57] jklioe: but yeah, that's where i stand. you're free to share this chat w/ the other TLs if you so please
[14:58] +5gen: i'll probs save it and when the suspect ends, we'll have to discuss reqs for future tests as council