30 Lesta Nediam LNC2016-08-18 0040 +Brian Hill

Lesta Nediam LNC2016-08-18 0040 +Brian Hill
https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ/posts/aBGKMxacaDs
https://pastebin.com/aKqVePAy
__

+Brian Hill __ With no qualifying sufficient proof by way of clear video that upon scrutiny remains free from potential editing points (i.e., "good honest footage") the odds of this being accidental/coincidental must be approaching zero as each event and subsequent year passes.

Sufficient proof isn't too much to ask for. It can exist and we are not being unreasonable in expecting to see it.

Sufficient proof can exist and should by now exist in spades - _for at least one event._

Recall that recent French gymnast who broke a leg soon after someone had wished him good luck by telling him to "break a leg". There was sufficient proof for that. There's sufficient proof for a thousand things - all around us - every day.

(The more popular an event is to be - the more lie system suggestions it will carry. A small, local, insignificant event can contain sufficient proof. Though you'll find even then it's fleeting and somehow flawed. The lie system must as much as possible stick to the "process" and engage the audience's imagination.)

When this is understood the alleged "ISS" can also be understood. The footage from that is *crippled* by way of the various video defects. *The mere presence of a single potential editing point forces the audience's imagination to activate and fill in the blanks*.

With each "ISS" video and passing year the odds of it being accidental/coincidental must surely be approaching zero given that the external HD camera can stream for tens of minutes without any video glitches!

*Surely the only thing more absurd and unlikely than the idea of the "ISS" being fake is that in more than 15 years "NASA" - with their billions - haven't been able to stream a "live" signal that upon scrutiny has been glitch free for just 10 minutes _when this is routinely done from the external camera!_*

I've obviously not watched every purportedly "live" "ISS" broadcast *but I've watched more than most _and I've watched enough_*.

__

I've watched enough "ISS" footage to know that potential editing points exist in them all. (But even if one or some were found to be free of such potential editing points [though one must then check whether it was really streamed live in its entirety] that doesn't affect anything I'm pointing out. Because it's all about first impressions - and for the "ISS" it would simply mean there really are men and women living in micro/zero-gravity and isn't that just inspiring and fantastic?! If it's all genuine then I wonder whether they know just how they're being used?! I wonder why "they" have to exaggerate their "mythical skills" to us?!)

__

Again - the presence of potential editing points does not mean the claim is false. Only that it instantly becomes indistinguishable to a magic trick and thus doubtable by the intelligent.

Forcing our imagination to fill in the blanks - however briefly - results in the audience member having to convince himself/herself of the claim.

That's the simple trick which is imperceptible to the majority - perhaps because they need it to be more complex than it really is.

The chief point (of this ramble) is this: with each event and year that passes - the odds of sufficient proof being either absent or crippled due to accident/chance must surely be approaching zero. *It must instead be nearing certainty that this is intentional*.

Through these realisations we can discover how the magic trick is being done *and like all magic tricks the trick is rendered obvious and unsatisfying and most disappointing once you know how! You are left wondering how on _God's beautiful flat Earth_ it can continue to fool large segments of the audience!

But it does - and once upon a time it fooled us too.

______________________________________________________________
My name is Lesta Nediam and I am cracking reality like a nut.

Lesta Nediam's YouTube Channel:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w

Lesta Nediam's Google Plus:
https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ

Lesta Nediam's Twitter:
https://twitter.com/LestaNediam

Lesta Nediam's Public Comments:
https://pastebin.com/u/Lesta

What does not exist - exists to exist.
What exists - exists to always exist.
As it is written - so it is done.