9 Lesta Nediam LNC2016-02-03 0705 +Mitch Conner

Lesta Nediam LNC2016-02-03 0705 +Mitch Conner
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h9Tj6k5sDYc&lc=z12xy5fw3s3edbxov04cdz5wjknqu1iwjck
https://pastebin.com/aJNWSdD1
__




+Mitch Conner __ [I know I owe you some replies elsewhere - they are coming.] There are a lot of things to note about that 49 second clip *and you have touched on many of the key points.* The audio aspect is something I will be going into in future. When you examine the longer "ISS" footage you can sometimes see distinct *mini gaps* in the audio track (and other phenomena that is suggestive of it being layered).







Also - on occasion - "NASA" have posted footage to their channel where there is only "background noise" (the "light hum" of the alleged "ISS") and we cannot hear anyone!







They have also posted footage where it is *silent* which would seem to imply they have made a "mistake" in encoding/uploading the video - but it could also suggest the video never had audio *added* to it.







This is all coming up in later videos (but first I am dealing with Reds Rhetoric and the people he seems to influence). I've been mindful of these possibilities ever since examining that alleged "Japanese ISIS hostage" (the one where I posted about possible "lip magic").







And so I strongly suspect the audio track is added [and layered] (*not always - but at least on occasion*).







I also strongly suspect that the lip movements are overlaid (*not always - but at least on occasion*). I have some footage of the "astronauts" speaking and their mouth is not making the correct movements for the sound they are supposed to be making (but everything else - including other words - are synchronised). Also - I have caught a rare glitch where the "astronauts" mouth appears "smoothed over". Like what we see "Agent Smith" do to "Neo" in the first "Matrix" movies. It is very revealing.







After having spent a lot of time examining the purported "ISS" footage I am left thinking that with *very simple* techniques it is possible to achieve the effect of "zero gravity". Keep in mind that whenever I talk about "how a trick may be done" I cannot *at all* claim to know how. If something is a "magic trick" then the only people who know how that magic trick is being done are the people who are doing the magic trick. *_With that always in mind here are some thoughts:_*







The dust we *always* see on the lens appears to be a limitation of the trick. As though there is a layer of glass with air [the dust serving as a kind of misdirection causing us to believe we must be looking at an air only environment]. This may also make a water scene appear as though it is an air scene [and it need not entirely be water but I don't want to go into too much detail].







If it is a trick then what we see need not always and only be done just one way. It need not only be filmed in a zero-gravity plane and it could sometimes be of people who are in a kind of neutral buoyancy tank - where each person is wearing a "smoothed body suit" with markers on them for computer software to give a pixel perfect overlay.







All you would need to do is record each person speaking in normal gravity and then once again floating in a water tank with their "smoothed body suit" which allows for the pixel-perfect overlay of their "skin" that was recorded while in normal gravity. How on _God's flat Earth_ is anyone going to know any better? There is a television series "Drunk History" where an alleged "drunk person" speaks and it is acted out by other people - doing a "lip sync". What I am suggesting would be a person doing the scene once and then acting it out again while in a neutral buoyancy suit. The "gravity footage" overlaid with the "neutral buoyancy" footage". One person doing it twice (as opposed to how "Drunk History" is purportedly done). This is all very simple. The only limitation would be that a "live interview" would not really be possible. But the purportedly "live" interviews all look to be pre-recorded magic tricks to me (with a kind of "choose your own adventure" playback).







Everyone watching is "belief controlled" - they simply believe it is real. They instinctively dismiss any glitches or reasons to doubt what they're seeing (kind of like when a person watches a movie - they push aside all of the reasons for thinking it is a movie via "doubt suppression" - they literally "suspend disbelief" and it happens instinctively whenever we watch motion pictures).







The major glitches we see may even be completely artificial so as to give the impression "they're in space!" - but they probably serve a dual purpose of allowing "them" to also cleverly stitch together multiple briefer segments of footage.







Who can say?! Who knows how it is being done?! As I say - at all times the discussion of "trick techniques" is fun speculation. And that is all it can ever be. I learned that lesson when I tried to point out some oddities to do with the "convulsions" we see with some of the "astronauts". People abused me as though I was asserting it is definitely being filmed underwater. (You saw those threads with that scoundrel "BzTruetalk" - what a charlatan he turned out to be.) Of course I cannot say that it is definitely filmed underwater. *The fact "NASA" makes a big deal about their "underwater training" and those images of it nearly always show us huge streams of bubbles with very blue water makes me think that is a misdirection.* That they are trying to get people to think away from the idea of being filmed in water ("astronauts" and "NASA" strike me as "stage magicians" who justify deceiving people [specifically children] all for the "greater good"). It is possible to have very clear water and it is possible to use video magic to make water appear invisible and besides - we only ever get worthless quality footage from the "ISS" with their "long duration" interviews. You may never be able to fake it in a movie with water but we are shown wretched quality footage.







There are likely *many* different ways to achieve the *very same* effect and therefore it is not possible to say *how.* It is always foolish to say, _"It was done this way and not that way"._ *To guess wrong will also be used as ammunition against the idea it is staged* (and that has been my own experience).







The point is: *what we need to see (the "sufficient proof") remains absent even after a decade and a half of the alleged manned "ISS".* The required *"sufficient proof"* footage has not even come about *by accident* when we reasonably would have expected it to. _By now we are more than justified in calling shenanigans!_







For those who are new to me and my ideas. "Sufficient proof" is that which is the answer to the question: *_"What do I need to see to necessarily know that this claim/event is real and genuine as we are told?"_* And with the case of the alleged "ISS" *sufficient proof means seeing sustained duration genuine zero-gravity footage that upon scrutiny remains free from glaring glitches, clever cuts, sneaky edits and misdirecting pans.* That might sound picky and seem particular but it really isn't. _It should be the easiest thing in the world for "NASA" to give._







After 15+ years surely a two minute clip of an "astronaut" clowning around *doing as many somersaults as possible in a row would have been filmed!* Surely that would be fascinating to the children! Children - who are the *target audience of the "ISS" footage.* The "little people" who are filled with wonder and who do not yet know it is even an option to doubt. The little people who unquestioningly trust their educators and the "astronauts". "Astronauts" who spend all of their spare time talking to children as opposed to "grown-up children" such as *university students, engineers and actual researchers!*







But all of the kinds of footage we would expect to see if it is real remains absent. A difficult thing to think about is usually the answer to: *_"what's missing?"_* but once your attention has been turned to it then it becomes the most obvious and noticeable thing in the world! _It can become *all you notice!*_







However - I suggest that all of this is intentional. This is all by design. All of these "oddities and anomalies" are permitted - and if "perfect footage" existed then *flaws would intentionally be introduced.* That is because *at all times we must be able to doubt it.* (And a consequence of the doubting process is to waste significant amounts of time doubting it. And when I doubt it there is a paradoxical effect that causes "ISS believers" to feel even more certain about their own unjustified belief! [They are more confident in their false/shadow belief!]) That is the one thing NONE of the so-called "truthers" in the so-called "truther community" has figured out and I have to wonder why. *It is not that an event or claim is fake and fabricated - it is that it can be doubted in the first place.* No one doubts last year's men's Wimbledon tennis winner. It would be literally insane to post videos saying last year's Wimbledon tennis final was a hologram! If "truthers" were truly crazy as our detractors suggest then we would find such claims and videos getting posted. _But we do not._ And after 15 years of purported "ISS" footage *we can still doubt what we see* - we can doubt (practically) every clip that is offered to us!







If we can doubt it *but we do not give attention to these doubts then we have suppressed the doubt* in order to *believe.* (Our belief is not justified and in Lesta's lie system lexicon I am calling this "unjustified belief" a "shadow belief". A belief that is founded and formed on trust and proof's appearances - where a person mistakes proof's appearances for proof.) When a person accepts one lie system event or claim as being real (even though it remains possible to doubt it) then that person becomes "belief controlled" (which is genuine "mind control"). *If we accept an event or claim as real then we think of it as real and we also perceive everything to do with it as also being real.* _And it is not surprising we then react poorly to those who suggest otherwise._







In fact - _because a person has *chosen* to believe it is real_ - they become naturally offended when another person suggests otherwise. That can explain their "anger" and "resentment". Often I get abused for "belittling humanities greatest achievement" (the "ISS") etc. *It is as though the abuser is personally offended by my genuine scepticism.* They do not see me presenting a problem with believing the alleged "ISS" but instead see me as having *personally attacked and slandered them.* As though the person is offended by my words and videos *ON BEHALF* of "NASA" and the "ISS"! All of this resentment and hate is rising up in a person who has hitherto been completely unknown by me (and afterwards remains so)! The "disgruntled viewer/reader" makes no effort to try and understand what I am saying. They make no effort to talk to me - they just register their disgust (on behalf of "NASA" and the "ISS") and leave!







But I am getting characteristically carried away!







Also - notice that in this video *we got to see the feet* of the "astronauts"! *For some time I have been saying that the "lie system reacts to Lesta".* (There are reasons for this which I will spare you of here.) This is yet another example of it. *On the 3rd of December, 2015 I remarked about how they never show us their feet during those "longer duration interviews"* (but note that this was only a 49 second clip - hardly a long duration clip!).







If you look at this Google Plus post I wrote and search for the word "feet" you will be taken to the relevant paragraph: https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ/posts/8q7hTtxfcSy







If you are lazy and don't want to do that then here is what I wrote (3rd/Dec/15):







__

_"(Or perhaps they breathe some substance that causes them to "float" for a while - *notice we never get to see their feet* - maybe they are constantly floating upwards [hence the bobbing motions] etc.)"_

__







I've mentioned the lack of seeing their feet a couple of times recently.







__










It is as though "they" are going through my posts and are looking at my objections and observations and are then posting videos that then "show otherwise". *Perhaps at some point there will be a long video that "debunks Lesta Nediam".* They can take each objection and show where it occurs during "NASA"/"ISS" footage. *"Ah ha! Don't you see? Lesta is just ignorant! Here is footage of what is claimed to be missing!"*







_I can foresee something like that happening at some point._







The only counter to that would be that whoever attempts to "debunk" my observations would need to find publically available footage that came *before* my observation was posted (via comment, video or G+ post). Any footage "showing how Lesta is wrong" that comes *after* my post *can be thought of as "damage control".* Because anyone can manufacture "evidence" *after-the-fact.* To undermine me "they" would need to show footage that has been officially posted *prior.*







Of course - having said that - there are indeed comments and observations I have made where I later on I did see footage that addressed the issue *before* I had made my comment/observation. *But that should be expected!* After all it is unlikely to think that if the "ISS" is being faked then they would not also have thought about the common objections and posted videos that quietly counter them.







And I see evidence of that happening for this reason: one thing that stands out about those videos is that they look designed *to cater specifically TO addressing an objection or concern!* They're a kind of "once-off" video as though to show "look!". For example - in this clip we do see their feet but in 97% of other clips we do not. *And so as innocent as it may seem this video stands out - _it is different_ - and we may justifiably ask: _"Why did they do it differently on this occasion?"_* And it turns out they had an "excuse" to make a video and in making that video they got to address one of the criticisms.







Another excellent example is the lack of *swallowing food* in zero gravity. There are dozens and dozens of videos purporting to show astronauts eating in space but when you look for the specific moment where they *swallow* - there is always a cut or an "obvious obstacle" gets in the way. Once or twice is natural but every single time?! That becomes a pattern! As far as I know there is really only *one* piece of footage that *appears* to show an "astronaut" actually swallowing food. And whenever I ask people about this aspect - THAT video always gets offered to me. Those people must have hunted for hours to find it (I know I had to) and so they MUST ALSO be aware that with all the other examples "something gets in the way" or there is a clever cut.







The point is: if seeing the feet is not a limitation of the trick then we would see it far more often. If swallowing food isn't a limitation of the trick then we would see it far more often. There ARE examples of it (that don't stand up to scrutiny) but they seem to serve as "once-off" examples so as to dismiss the objection or concern. This is dishonest!







It is curious to me that we don't have multiple examples of footage that address each criticism. And it is also curious that we don't have footage that addresses multiple criticisms in a single video! For example - we won't find footage of an "astronaut" standing up such that we see his or her feet *and also* chewing and swallowing food! That would address two objections/criticisms in one. And if something is real and it is natural then that is what we would expect to see. And after 15+ years(!) it's not as though being on a cramped "International Space Station" they have a million different things to post about. Standing up - full body - should not be considered rare or controversial. Chewing and swallowing food on the "ISS" should not be considered rare or controversial. *And so seeing both together should not be controversial and it would be something we would expect to have naturally occurred over the past 15+ years!* (Having written this - watch for a video that has both of these things coming soon to "NASA's" YouTube channel!)







As I say, if it were all natural and genuine we would expect to see these things by now - _even if only by accident_ - by "blind chance and dumb luck". Since these kinds of videos magically appear days to weeks after Lesta has publically posted about them *that is why I say that the lie system reacts to Lesta.* In more than a few instances the "ISS"/"NASA" footage has come *AFTER* my post. Not once. Not twice. Not three or four times. *But many times.* (Though you would only know it - [and believe it] - if you kept up with my Google Plus posts and saw it happening with your own eyes.) *I certainly don't see anyone else in the so-called "truth community" doing what I am doing* (writing down these things and posting about them as I am - not even close - *who is the runner-up?*).







Okay, that covers a lot of things and I've rambled on for long enough! ))










__________________________________________
Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's posts, comments, videos and discussions:
https://pastebin.com/Bfr5RMSg

Here is Lesta Nediam's Google Plus posts (i.e., blog) - this is where Lesta is most active:
https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ

Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's video uploads:
https://pastebin.com/WV42jUb1

Here is Lesta Nediam's YouTube channel - for videos about the lie system:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w