Rep Steve King Aug 4 17

OBAMA, HILLARY AND COMEY JUST RECIEVED THE WORST NEWS OF THEIR LIVES by WIKIPOLITICS


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=biSFD8zDUvY  Aug 4 2017 Rep Steve King wants to see 650,000 Hillary emails

Transcript
0:00
and yes the story has been ripped wide
0:02
open Obama Hillary and Comey are going
0:04
down after what this representative just
0:07
declared to Congress we will show you
0:09
the clip in a moment but first Carter
0:10
for the gateway Punnett is now reporting
0:12
that representative Steve King addressed
0:14
Congress
0:15
supporting legislation that would force
0:18
the current Attorney General to turn
0:20
over documents regarding the former FBI
0:22
director James Comey involvement in
0:24
various controversial cases that
0:26
legislation passed 16 to 13 with King
0:30
voting in favor of it he writes the king
0:33
addressed Congress with an impassioned
0:35
and detailed speech take a look the long
0:39
string that we should be looking at with
0:42
this investigation and special counsel
0:44
that ours our request here it goes a
0:47
long ways back it goes clear back to
0:49
Houma Abba Dean Anthony Weiner 650,000
0:53
emails which we still have access to and
0:56
the question that was pre answered to us
0:59
by James Comey which is there was
1:01
nothing to see there we did a fast
1:03
software search of 650,000 emails and in
1:07
the case of Houma Abidine at Anthony
1:09
Weiner sharing laptop and sharing emails
1:11
there was nothing new in 650,000 emails
1:15
and what we've done in this Congress so
1:17
far has just taken his word for that now
1:19
it seemed fairly logical to take his
1:21
word at the time until you examine the
1:23
investigation that he conducted of
1:26
Hillary Clinton all by the way it was a
1:28
matter the investigation that had Cheryl
1:31
Mills her chief of staff as her chief
1:32
counsel in the room with Hillary Clinton
1:35
and both of them had a plea bargain of
1:37
some kind they were exempted from
1:39
prosecution for some fight by limited
1:42
terms but in any case when you have this
1:44
chief of staff who is a subject of
1:46
investigation to there as counsel to the
1:49
person who is the subject of the
1:50
investigation and we ask under oath and
1:52
I ask these questions of Comey are about
1:54
Loretta Lynch and call me under oath and
1:56
that is where's the copy of the
1:58
transcript where is that where is the
2:00
audio files where's the video files who
2:03
was in the room we don't have the
2:04
answers today except no there was no
2:07
there were known if there were notes
2:09
taken we don't know who's they
2:10
are where they are if there was any
2:12
transcript of the deposition then that
2:15
doesn't exist either neither do the
2:17
tapes of either audio or video this is
2:19
what looks like on its face is a sham
2:22
investigation plus they destroyed a
2:24
tremendous amount of information at
2:25
least 30,000 emails crushed hard drives
2:28
bought Bleach bit hired outside
2:30
contractors to scrub the emails up and
2:32
were to take James commis word for this
2:34
that there wasn't enough substance there
2:37
to bring a prosecution even though on a
2:39
year ago July 5th James Comey delivered
2:42
15 minutes of the summary of a
2:43
prosecution that was completely
2:45
convincing to me until they got down to
2:47
the last couple of sentences of that
2:48
presentation which is well we can't
2:51
prove intent well curiously there's no
2:53
requirement for intent in the two
2:55
statutes that appear to have been
2:56
violated and furthermore I look back in
2:59
the records to the previous October and
3:01
the previous April Barack Obama stated
3:03
into the into the the news media record
3:07
he said Hillary Clinton would never
3:09
intend to put our national security at
3:12
risk Hillary Clinton would never intend
3:14
to harm America's security that's
3:16
October and April the previous October
3:18
in April well James Comey latched on to
3:21
that word intend and they made up new
3:24
law and gave Hillary Clinton an
3:25
exemption for this lack of intent that
3:28
they said they couldn't prove which is
3:30
absolutely proven by the facts that he
3:31
delivered to us in the summary that day
3:33
and that there is evidence for and I
3:35
would go on not only does this trail
3:37
lead through Hillary Clinton and James
3:39
Comey but the Loretta Lynch component of
3:41
this as well when you put this in place
3:43
and you look at the example of them on
3:45
the tarmac it's hard to imagine they sat
3:48
there for 38 minutes and discussed
3:50
grandchildren I think that might even be
3:52
singular grandchild at the time we
3:54
should check that but the the answers
3:57
that we got from Loretta Lynch were far
3:58
less and satisfying and then that brings
4:00
me to alexandra chalupa who went off as
4:04
that she was a DNC contractor that went
4:06
off over to Ukraine to try to gather
4:08
dirt on it on the Trump people so
4:10
bringing this around mr. chairman I'll
4:12
conclude it with this as my time will
4:14
soon run out and that is this that the
4:15
trail leads I believe also to Barack
4:18
Obama we need to investigate all of this
4:20
wasn't that something else the trail
4:22
leads to Barack Obama
4:24
and we need to investigate all of this
4:26
now I am so glad that we have good
4:29
congressman still fighting for justice
4:31
working to convict the true criminals in
4:33
Washington DC if you agree with
4:36
representative Steve King then mash that
4:38
share button and leave your comments
4:40
below if you do are you worried about
4:45
Islamic terrorism well you shouldn't be
4:47
because a new poll by Pew Research finds
4:49
that only 20% of Muslims believe that
4:52
targeting civilians can be acceptable as
4:54
a tactic to further a religious cause
4:57
that means if you meet five Muslims only
4:59
one of them is likely to think it's okay
5:00
to kill you so that's good meanwhile a
5:03
California Imam is apologizing after he
5:05
referred to Jews as filth watch Allah o
5:09
Allah liberate the al-aqsa mosque from
5:11
the filth of the Jews o Allah count them
5:14
one by one and annihilate them down to
5:16
the very last one and not spare any of
5:18
them so do we have Islam all wrong is it
5:22
actually a tolerant faith Bob tomorrow
5:24
is a convert to Islam he was a longtime
5:26
foreign service officer working for the
5:28
State Department where he converted
5:29
trustee now at the all Dulles area
5:32
Muslim society and he joins us on the
5:34
set Bob thanks a lot for coming on my
5:35
pleasure thank you so actually know a
5:38
lot of decent peaceful Muslims so I'm
5:41
not here to impugn a faith or a people
5:42
or anything like that but one in five
5:44
say it's okay to kill in the name of
5:47
furthering religious cause that that
5:49
seems like a pretty troubling number it
5:50
would be I don't believe it you know i
5:52
from my experience and people that I've
5:54
seen people that I've talked to over the
5:56
last I've been Muslim for 37 years the
5:59
people that I've talked to the number is
6:00
now nowhere near that you know they in
6:04
in this area if you went to the to the
6:08
Adam center you wouldn't find a single
6:10
person who would say that that's I
6:12
believe that but my guess is that you
6:15
know there are a lot of well educated
6:16
affluent Muslims in this area around DC
6:19
but I've seen a bunch of poles like this
6:21
that show that the attitudes of faithful
6:24
Muslims are not Western at all and that
6:26
they include a tolerance of violence you
6:28
don't find amongst a Presbyterians or
6:30
Jews so what that's not good you know I
6:35
have not seen that specific
6:37
pull myself so I'm not I can't say for
6:39
sure but you know elections fee is from
6:42
my personal experience and that that
6:44
would be absolutely impossible to
6:46
believe based on what I've seen so a lot
6:48
of Americans are concerned about Sharia
6:51
law sure and they're concerned about
6:53
polls that show a striking large number
6:56
of Muslims would like to see it supplant
6:58
civil law in the countries in which they
7:01
live Great Britain for instance a huge
7:02
percentage would like to see it become
7:04
the law of Great Britain and in the
7:06
United States pretty large number say
7:09
the same but in in England is four out
7:11
of ten British Muslims in France twenty
7:14
nine percent of French Muslims would
7:16
like to see it
7:17
replace French law why shouldn't that
7:19
make Americans nervous as more Muslims
7:22
move here if those figures are accurate
7:24
there is it's certainly not accurate
7:25
here I have not met any one person ever
7:29
who would ever say that they want to
7:31
supplant US law they mean the majority
7:34
of people who came here to the United
7:36
States came here because they want to
7:38
live in America they want to live under
7:40
the US Constitution they want freedom of
7:42
religion they want freedom of politics
7:43
they want the freedoms that are that
7:46
every American wants Sharia law for them
7:49
is simply religious practice now if you
7:52
wanted to say that you know Muslims
7:54
could not practice their religion here
7:56
for example if they said well everyone
7:58
this is a Christian country everyone has
8:00
to pray on Sunday all church services
8:02
have to be on Sundays only people would
8:04
object today Muslims want to be able to
8:06
practice their religion the way that
8:09
it's being taught but in countries with
8:11
high percentages of Muslims I think
8:14
every country with a high percentage of
8:16
Muslims there's not religious pluralism
8:19
actually I don't know of a single Gulf
8:21
country where it's illegal to
8:22
proselytize on behalf of another
8:24
religion I think that in every Muslim
8:27
majority country in the world
8:28
non-muslims are treated have fewer
8:30
rights so why wouldn't that give
8:33
Americans pause again as many Muslims
8:36
are moving here not true here there many
8:39
countries Malaysia for example Indonesia
8:41
many countries that are Muslim majority
8:44
enshrine the rights of
8:47
other non-muslim faiths now in Malaysia
8:50
there are people you will find people
8:52
who will say oh no no you have to follow
8:54
your certainly the things that are more
8:57
appropriate to Islam but the the the
9:00
majority of people there are not like
9:03
that you're always going to find some
9:04
crazy people who want so wait a second I
9:06
mean every every Arab country mm-hmm
9:08
every single one it has separate rights
9:10
for Muslims and non-muslims
9:12
in every single Christian majority
9:14
country I'm aware of religious pluralism
9:17
is the law so there's a massive
9:19
difference in Outlook a lot of Muslims
9:21
seem to see Islam not just as a religion
9:24
but as a political system I mean that
9:26
seems real to me why deny that well you
9:28
know you're talking about religious
9:29
versus cultural attitudes a lot of those
9:32
countries the our cultural attitudes if
9:34
you've read the Quran the Quran
9:36
specifically says that you must tolerate
9:38
there is no compulsion in religion the
9:40
second chapter of the Quran specifically
9:42
says that and specifically in shrines
9:44
the rights of other people for their
9:46
religious practice especially people of
9:48
the book so you often hear people say
9:51
well Sharia is intolerant women are
9:54
treated badly gays are treated badly and
9:56
you hear people say no actually it's
9:58
basically it's an early form of feminism
10:00
and women are empowered but then if you
10:02
look at it actually women have in the
10:03
Quran fewer rights than men do and that
10:07
just seems incompatible with attitudes
10:09
in the West right now well but think
10:11
about it
10:11
what were the attitudes in the RET in
10:12
the West when the Quran was first
10:14
revealed women didn't have any white
10:16
rights shared West but in in in Islam
10:18
women had specific rights they had the
10:21
right to hope to own property they had
10:23
the right to be inherit property they
10:25
had the right to testify in courts those
10:27
rights didn't come in the West and for
10:29
the 20th century I think that's all true
10:30
but we're in the 21st century I know and
10:33
then things are very different now yeah
10:34
and so you still for example in
10:36
countries governed by Sharia see things
10:39
like female testimony being less
10:41
valuable than male testimony inheritance
10:43
rights are different for donors than
10:45
they are for some men and women are not
10:46
treated equally under Sharia right now
10:49
so why is that not a problem if we're
10:52
trying to assimilate a lot of Muslims
10:54
into this country well you know are you
10:56
saying it's a problem in those countries
10:57
they're probably not
10:58
look I'm in America and there's a
11:01
massive effort on the part of the left
11:02
to import a lot of Muslims here for
11:04
whatever reason and I'm not against it
11:06
necessarily but I just think that it's
11:08
really important for people to
11:09
assimilate to the values of the country
11:10
to which they're moving and they do and
11:12
I'm worried that they won't because it's
11:14
so different there Addison's are so
11:15
different from ours no no not really
11:17
because most of the people who have come
11:19
here are different people they're a very
11:23
well-educated group many people came
11:24
here to for advanced studies they came
11:26
here to practice very in various
11:29
professions so in ER under Sharia law
11:32
let's say just on the concept of
11:33
inheritance you can follow with what the
11:36
Quran says about inheritance or you can
11:38
follow what the the Constitution says
11:40
about it right so it's really a choice
11:42
between the individuals no one is forced
11:44
to if somebody wants to follow that I
11:47
and say alright I'm going to I guess
11:49
I'll do it this way and I hope they hope
11:51
they will Bob Marley you I have to say I
11:53
disagree with you but you are a great
11:54
spokesman for what you believe work fast
11:55
you very much thanks