Deleted by Cowardly Electrik; destroy climate narrative

"Just boomers or to preempt, NTs? I was diagnosed w/ Aspergers' at 5yo in 1998...told to slit my wrists, do I get an apology merely since I've her diagnosis?

-Ozone's almost fully healed for some years even prior the declined emissions in '16
-Mass (>97%) extinctions were caused by tectonic collisions that've bounced back
-Amount of CO2 dispersed by Santorini was far higher that of the entire age of industrialization
-Droughts forced Amerindian tribes in the Indies or what's now Silicon Valley hundreds of years ago, their biodiversity shot yet respiked thereafter, extinct groups due to unrelated factors
-Little ice ages occurred during medieval+renaissance­ eras affecting China to Africa as well that which is upcoming
-Cat5 hurricanes go back to prehistory during longer seasons than we see now, none caused by e.g. the medieval warming period
-Treerings are notoriously unreliable measurements, the IPCC is uncautious in considering acid winds between seas while completely neglecting SLCPs which make oil peak even if eventually true largely irrelevant regardless of scarcity in reserve vs undrilled/used (reminds me of those alleging BTC befall Kondriatev curves but the way its modified AES operates is that mining per rewards, halved+unhalved adapts directly to demand in its value so if it got to any such point of value, it'd be already futile to mine at all)
-Projections by int'l bodies not only ignore the effect of consumers ("hogwash?" Vegans hardly ripple to affect meat demand, e.g.) but prematurely do so w/o noting pollution's gone down on our east coast thanks to shale which avoids spilling
-Lithium or coal, Tesla relies on subsidies while DC's all electric plan seated all green corporatists on its committee
-Windmills rely on flatland, decline in efficiency swiftly as well affect wildlife while solar panels rely on absorption that save for massive size cannot account for Alaskan winters, hydroelectric dams require certain geomorphic features
-Green buildings by their own audit do little for emissions in coal usage while bluelight affects mortality+sleeping among other things as mandated by the EPA (an initial 60% cut of regulations though since filled-out were little to do w/ ecological matters)

The other hand:
-GMOs are a product of the green revolution taken from that of NSDAP innovations like the BLM that let forests go up in flames by refusing to clear underbrush by boxfire
-Infrastructure bills are the main stimulus behind deforestation

Do YOU do research?

It is called ad populum - look it up

If it is unpolitical, please send me evidence you personally either gathered or can independently rearticulate (don't cite the redacted UN report on livestock methane). Else, I can only imagine you conflate ethos or logos w/ pathos & project very politically indeed but all...scientism in this sense of the word involves p-hacking, being its own religion as a matter of swarm network

Oh btw, it was Roman Catholics (~2/3 vote left) who began the movement, a boomer who established Earth Day The Sinn Fiall is tory, pro-green. Just religious folk? Actually many tea partiers believe in global warming, esp. its devoutly religious protestants. Atheists vary less (Wall St generally believes while Randians deny, both outright whether for PR or genuine)

Sedivacantists make that a dogma but even then, integralists are oft adamantly green - ofc nothing in the bible even literalistically calls for climatological stance. The conservative synodic lutherans however contemplated evolution before Darwin the Parson naturalist or his also Christian grandfather much as Einstein the atheist jew got the expanding universe from a cardinal. Likewise, it was the church that expounded heliocentrism as it considered geo -pagan