A Grand Primer on 4G Warfare

A grand primer on 4G warfare.

First, let's go over the definitions. Every generations of warfare have more dimensions added on top. So, let's go over examples to better illustrate my point:

1st gen warfare: You have an army or tribal group or warband against another one. You get archers, cavalry, and men with swords, rushing at each-others. Now the optimal strategy depends largely on the terrain, this is the first dimension of the war. If you have the high ground, you'd send your infantry down and keep your archers up as to let arrows rain on your enemy, if it is a flat terrain and the opponent has less infantry than you do, you would most likely attempt to flank them. If you have the element of surprise, encircling them is the optimal method. Anyways, you get my point. This is field warfare 101. Now you have to add castles, sieges, and defense on top of that, which forms the second dimension. The third dimension is a lot more important: Attrition, you're going to want to starve your enemy and cost them as much as you can. Burning and pillaging, classical methods to do just that, Russian scorched earth strategy, all that jazz. It's not that complex, once you get the hang of it.

2nd gen warfare: It is functionally the same as the first gen warfare, but you add gunpowder over it. You replace siege catapults, trebuchets and balistas with canons, you replace the basic infantry with gun wielding infantry. The archer is functionally replaced by the canon and other artillery pieces, and the cavalry becomes essentially only a flanking tool, and is as such a lot less necessary than it was before. Naval warfare is also a lot more important, you now have cannon boats and all that jazz.

3rd gen warfare: Post 1850-war. Add railways, planes, information collection, public opinion and polls (we democracy now). I think the best example would be WW2, everyone knows what a WW2 battle looks like, or has an idea of it.

So, what makes 4th gen warfare so different? Let's look at Aghanistan. We technically won the war in Afghanistan... If we consider it by 3rd gen warfare terms. See, we crushed their government, made the Taliban disapear from the map. Let me ask you, do you think Aghan people like the USA? They fucking hate the USA, they hate Israel and they hate Shias. And it's not blind hate, we ARE their enemies. We made their whole government fall. Afghanistan belongs to islamic mercenaries more than it belongs to us. As soon as we pull out, it's no longer a "peaceful country". Not that it ever was.

Let's look at Libya. We killed Muhammar Gaddhafi on false pretenses, we obviously orchestrated a false revolution. Guess who Libya now belongs to? Oh, that's right. Islamic mercenaries and the Muslim Brotherhood. We saw that happen over and over again. We won nothing, we keep losing. Because we're hated.

See, traditional warfare, you would conquer a territory, either expel, kill or adopt its population. Now, all we do, is we crush a government and leave an empty spot... That Islamic terrorists love to fill. We functionally lose on the long term, we keep making enemies. Our enemies grow bolder, and we keep fighting the same stupid wars for Israel. Short thing short, what is 4G warfare? It's a war of opinions and economy. You want to demoralize your opponent and take his wealth, or in the case of the Alt-Right and our fellow good goyim, we want to destroy the jews' infrastructure and demoralize them. Drive them to the point of insanity. Take their wealth. And put a leash back on them. I ultimately care very little about the genocide of jews, I care about if they are with us or against us. And currently, they're against us. And it bothers me very much. Very, very much.

Now don't go call me an antisemitic piece of shit. The antisemite label is used only to shut us up. It's bullshit. And that's an example of efficient jewish mind control. We ULTIMATELY want to make friends, not enemies, and drive the public our way. Someday fellow white people grow too bold and they give birth to another Timothy McVeigh, whose actions are a despicable but natural reaction to a bold jewry. Terrorism is a move used only by a party who has no tool, no army, no infrastructure, and /nothing to lose/. Most important point. The more jews drive us to the edge, the more you see siegetards. The more siegetards you see, the more likely you start to see far-right terrorism, and that ultimately is a very destabilizing factor for the government, it slows public debate, it destroys infrastructure, it's costly, and there is nothing you can do to prevent it.

I do not advocate for violence. I never have, I never will. Do not go blow yourselves up because I wrote this, this is stupid. However, it is a functional part of 4G warfare.

Ricky Vaughn is partly right about the nationalized imagery, but in my view, the most important thing is will, strong will, persistence, diligence, experimentality and progressive installation of infrastructure. We ultimately will need to get a leader, we will need infrastructure, we will need a level of secrecy, and we will need to get those retards who want to see us in jail to stop for once. For a few moments.

Labor Omnia Vincit.

Sieg heil!