Guest User

TurnKey Internet Sued By HITRUST

a guest
Oct 19th, 2019
195
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 3.53 KB | None | 0 0
  1. Latham, New York datacenter and web host TurnKey Internet sued by the HITRUST Alliance for lying to and misleading consumers by falsely claiming to be certified, abuse of their trademark and dilution of their brand.
  2.  
  3. Public Docket:
  4. https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/nyscef/DocumentList?docketId=n4n/0g/qunk72H06by4beA==&display=all
  5.  
  6. NATURE OF ACTION: This action seeks recovery for (i) Defendant TurnKey
  7. Internet, Inc. (“TurnKey”)’s unauthorized use, infringement and dilution of Plaintiff
  8. HITRUST Services Corp. (“HITRUST”)’s registered trademarks HITRUST®, U.S. Reg.
  9. No. 5320843, and HITRUST CSF®, U.S. Reg. No. 5320844, and certification mark
  10. HITRUST CSF Certified™ in violation of the federal Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1114
  11. and 1125, and N.Y. G.B.L. § 360-l;
  12. (ii) TurnKey’s violation of 15 U.S.C.A. § 1125 and
  13. N.Y. G.B.L. §§ 349 and 350 by engaging in deceptive trade practices and false
  14. advertising to the public at large on its website, online advertisements in listing services
  15. and print advertisements distributed to potential customers that Turnkey was “HITRUST
  16. CERTIFIED” (as an example, see Attachment A) when it was not so certified and
  17. misrepresenting in press releases that its data center was complaint with “HITRUST CSF
  18. certification”;
  19. (iii) TurnKey’s unfair competition with authorized users of the certification
  20. mark HITRUST CSF Certified™ by holding itself out as having attained certification
  21. when it was not so certified;
  22. (iii) breach of an agreement with HITRUST to cease use of
  23. the HITRUST’s marks (the “Agreement”); and
  24. (iv) breach of the implied covenant of
  25. good and fair dealing in the Agreement by continuing the use of the HITRUST’s marks
  26. in flagrant violation of the Agreement. TurnKey continued its use of HITRUST’s marks
  27. after receiving successive cease and desist letters and after the Agreement, and, thereby,
  28. its wrongful conduct was willful and knowing warranting treble damages and such
  29. exceptional circumstances warrant the award of attorneys’ fees. TurnKey offers its
  30. services to customers in the New York City region as specifically stated on its website.
  31.  
  32. HITRUST has been irreparably harmed by TurnKey’s wrongful conduct in
  33. infringing HITRUST’s marks and holding itself out as “HITRUST CERTIFIED” when it
  34. was not. TurnKey’s wrongful conduct also was directed to the public at large by soliciting
  35. new customers for its business via false advertising on its website and in online and print
  36. advertisements. Injunctive relief is necessary because there is no remedy at law.
  37.  
  38. RELIEF SOUGHT: Plaintiff seeks permanent injunctive relief, monetary
  39. damages in the amount of at least $50,000.00, as well as all other available remedies,
  40. including attorneys’ fees and treble damages arising from TurnKey’s willful and knowing
  41. violations, court costs and/or and any other relief that this Court finds to be just.
  42.  
  43. Should Defendant fail to appear herein, judgment will be entered by default, and
  44. such judgment shall (i) issue a permanent injunction prohibiting TurnKey’s use of the
  45. mark HITRUST®, HITRUST CSF® and certification mark HITRUST CSF Certified™;
  46. (ii) grant monetary damages in the sum of $50,000.00; (iii) grant treble damages in the
  47. amount of $150,000.00; (iv) award to HITRUST as the prevailing party attorneys’ fees in
  48. an amount to be determined by this Court as provided by U.S.C.A. § 1114 (a) and N.Y.
  49. G.B.L. § 349; (v) award statutory interest from October 15, 2018, the date of the first
  50. cease and desist letter; and (vi) grant court costs.
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment