Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up,
it unlocks many cool features!
- 00:13:28: <SMB> Greetings everybody, welcome to the first Poll Committee Chairperson Election Debate!
- 00:13:47: <Mariofan169> clap clap clap
- 00:14:04: <SMB> Marioguy1 and I will be the co-hosts for tonight.
- 00:15:06: <SMB> The rules are that the channel will be muted, so as not to have many interruptions.
- 00:15:24: <SMB> If you have any questions for the candidates that are present, please send them to either MG1 or me.
- 00:16:05: <Tucayo> Via query
- 00:16:06: <SMB> Of course, be sure to send them via query on the chat.
- 00:16:12: <SMB> Yes, what Tucayo said. :P
- 00:16:42: <TerryDactyl> 3I have something to say though
- 00:16:43: <SMB> We will then voice you and have the candidate answer your questions. You will be allowed to do follow-ups when the candidate is done answering.
- 00:16:51: <mg1> /query MG1 or /query SMB
- 00:16:53: <SMB> Edo: Oh, yes?
- 00:17:06: <TerryDactyl> 3You should voice Crash. Its kind of unfair if the runningmates cant talk
- 00:17:13: <SMB> Oh, yes, my aologies.
- 00:17:16: <SMB> *apologies
- 00:17:24: <SMB> `op Crash
- 00:18:11: <Crocodile_Dippy> it speaks
- 00:18:19: <Crocodile_Dippy> how awful
- 00:19:58: <SMB> Also, runningmates will be allowed to assist their candidate answer questions should they opt to do so.
- 00:20:36: <Crocodile_Dippy> any questions yet
- 00:20:47: <mg1> Yes
- 00:20:55: <mg1> The first question comes from Bop (Magus)
- 00:20:59: <mg1> It is for both candidates
- 00:21:04: <mg1> What do you plan on doing to improve the current state of the Poll Committee and why?
- 00:21:19: <mg1> Magus: Do you have anyone you would like to answer it first?
- 00:22:17: <Magus> Doesn't matter to me.
- 00:23:24: <Crocodile_Dippy> I'm of a multiplatform background, so for one I don't want to severely limit the range of poll questions that can be placed on the front page. Mind, the Mario games will still be the top priority, but it's good to encourage exploration and branching tastes.
- 00:23:38: <mg1> OK, I guess DP is first...
- 00:24:46: <Crocodile_Dippy> I want to make the committee feel welcoming, but also keep it stern. No negligence on my watch, unless there's a very good reason; but I'll also stick up for the members and ensure they know I appreciate their work. I don't acknowledge bans unless they're permanent, so getting in a bit of trouble on IRC or wherever won't affect the committee in my eyes.
- 00:25:34: <Crocodile_Dippy> I'm best at working out changes as I go along, tho, so expect more of that sometime in the future.
- 00:25:46: <Crocodile_Dippy> </tangent>
- 00:26:23: <mg1> OK
- 00:26:23: <mg1> Magus
- 00:26:35: <mg1> Does that answer your question (or at least, half of it)?
- 00:26:45: <Crocodile_Dippy> oh why
- 00:27:05: <mg1> Because Tucayo still has to speak
- 00:27:16: <Crocodile_Dippy> no I mean
- 00:27:26: <Crocodile_Dippy> the why is Because I like recreation and want the Wiki to have more fun projects that people can enjoy
- 00:27:41: <Crocodile_Dippy> and I believe a team is a team, and loyalty is important
- 00:28:03: <Crocodile_Dippy> if I don't show loyalty to my staff, how can I expect them to treat me with the same dedication?
- 00:29:23: <Magus> I have no follow-up for Dippy.
- 00:29:26: <mg1> OK
- 00:29:31: <mg1> Tucayo, now, then
- 00:30:06: <Tucayo> Seeing how this is a question that deals with the state of the current committee a lot, It would probably be better if someone from inside the committee could elaborate on it. Having said that, my runningmate, Edofenrir, will answer this question
- 00:30:20: <TerryDactyl> 3yeah, ok
- 00:30:38: <TerryDactyl> 3So, I've been in the Poll Committee for a year now
- 00:30:59: <TerryDactyl> 3and it isn't really in an optimal shape
- 00:31:37: <TerryDactyl> 3A lot of committee members are mostly inactive
- 00:31:45: <TerryDactyl> 3Polls are often made at the last possible minute
- 00:31:58: <TerryDactyl> 3It is not really all that efficient.
- 00:32:46: <TerryDactyl> 3So what we think is that, before thinking about what fancy new additions to make to the system, we should rather focus on getting the fundamental issues of the committee sorted out
- 00:32:55: <TerryDactyl> 3and get the project up and running
- 00:33:39: <TerryDactyl> 3Then, once this is accomplished, we can focus on what to implement to make the project more interesting
- 00:34:44: <TerryDactyl> 3So like, what I am trying to say here is: "Basic needs come first, expansion later"
- 00:35:20: <TerryDactyl> 3To accomplish this, we need some fundamental changes.
- 00:35:28: <TerryDactyl> 3An active team.
- 00:35:35: <TerryDactyl> 3An increase in motivation.
- 00:35:55: <TerryDactyl> 3And an efficient way to make the system work.
- 00:36:12: <TerryDactyl> 3Otherwise the whole thing will just fall apart.
- 00:36:40: <TerryDactyl> 3That's pretty much the gist of it.
- 00:36:46: <TerryDactyl> 3Are there questions?
- 00:37:29: <Crocodile_Dippy> man I should've asked you to be my running mate
- 00:37:43: <Crash> :'(
- 00:37:44: <mg1> Magus?
- 00:37:52: <Magus> I have no follow-up.
- 00:38:01: <mg1> OK
- 00:38:01: <TerryDactyl> 3ok
- 00:38:10: <Crocodile_Dippy> Crash, you'll make a fine pet, don't worry
- 00:38:10: <mg1> Thank you DP and Tucayo (Edo)
- 00:38:12: <TerryDactyl> 3hold it, robot >:(
- 00:38:15: <Crocodile_Dippy> you have a snazzy tie
- 00:38:29: <TerryDactyl> 3I have one last remark
- 00:38:35: <mg1> Remember, send any questions to myself or SMB via query
- 00:39:07: <SMB> `devoice Magus
- 00:39:24: <SMB> Should you have a question later, Magus, you may be revoiced for the same purposes and whatnot.
- 00:39:48: <TerryDactyl> 3can I just say one last thing?
- 00:39:49: <SMB> Now, we have a question from Nabber to Tucayo.
- 00:39:54: <SMB> Sure, go ahead.
- 00:40:02: <TerryDactyl> 3Once the basic requirements for the committee are covered, I agree there is room for some expansions.
- 00:40:37: <TerryDactyl> 3What I could imagine is handing some influence over the polls over to the community, within reason.
- 00:41:02: <TerryDactyl> 3I'm not entirely sure how to accomplish that efficiently, but
- 00:41:30: <TerryDactyl> 3I'm imagining that maybe, users might be given a platform to make poll suggestions to the committee
- 00:42:17: <TerryDactyl> 3Since this is a project that is supposed to benefit the community, I think that community input might be beneficial, and should therefore be appreciated.
- 00:42:22: <Crocodile_Dippy> that's a fantastic idea. I'm all about voter participation.
- 00:42:56: <TerryDactyl> 3It also eases the workload of the committee somewhat
- 00:43:08: <TerryDactyl> 3giving them a larger pool of suggestions to choose from
- 00:43:24: <TerryDactyl> 3which in turn, will increase efficiency even more
- 00:43:44: <TerryDactyl> 3But that's all now, I've been chewing off your ears for long enough <_>
- 00:43:55: <SMB> :P
- 00:44:27: <SMB> Thank you for the question, Bop, and for the responses from both campaigns.
- 00:44:38: <SMB> Now, we have a question from Nabber to Tucayo.
- 00:44:43: <mg1> (again)
- 00:44:44: <Crocodile_Dippy> Can I just say that I agree with pretty much everything he's saying? Especially the voter thing. I wasn't aware that the current state of the committee was so inefficient. :x
- 00:44:50: <Crocodile_Dippy> getting them to make suggestions
- 00:45:43: <SMB> Alright.
- 00:45:57: <SMB> Nabber said: "He says "That is why, I will also look for a diverse committee. Responsibility is what I'll be looking for in committee members, should I win." What I want to know is, how will he choose who is responsible and what does he mean by diverse members?"
- 00:46:11: <SMB> `voice Nabber|iPad
- 00:46:16: <SMB> Tucayo, your response?
- 00:46:25: <Tucayo> Yes, I'm on it
- 00:47:13: <Tucayo> If you had read my campaign, you'd know how I was going to pick the members(...)
- 00:47:41: <Tucayo> 2 (or 4) spots will go to my fellow candidates. Why? Well, because since they are running that means they have interest in the process and would work most certainly to improve it.
- 00:48:24: <Tucayo> For the remaining spots, I'd use DP's suggestion of an application system(...)
- 00:49:00: <Tucayo> To see who will really be interested and who will actually work to improve the current state of the committee.
- 00:49:15: <Tucayo> As for the second part of your question,
- 00:49:50: <Tucayo> by "diverse" I mean giving newer users a chance to get involved in a team and the community. Which I also mentioned in my campaign.
- 00:50:49: <Tucayo> Done. Any follow-ups, Nabber?
- 00:51:01: <Nabber|iPad> Nope. Thank you.
- 00:51:20: <Tucayo> Thank you for your question.
- 00:52:09: <TerryDactyl> 3Diverse should also mean that we will try not to fall into only picking users from one or two groups
- 00:53:01: <TerryDactyl> 3That's been the source of displeasure among the community recently
- 00:53:39: <TerryDactyl> 3and we don't want to promote the further building of exclusive user cliques
- 00:54:07: <Crocodile_Dippy> (at least not in professional circumstances)
- 00:54:28: <TerryDactyl> 3yes, that
- 00:54:37: <mg1> OK
- 00:54:41: <mg1> Thank you candidates
- 00:54:47: <mg1> The next question comes from SMB
- 00:55:07: <mg1> It is for both candidates
- 00:55:09: <mg1> Each year, we have helped the Awards Committee in rotating their polls on the Main Page. My question is, what do you plan to do with Awards polls should you win? Do you have any ideas on how to improve the Awards polls rotations?
- 00:55:09: <TerryDactyl> 3ew
- 00:55:23: <mg1> Do we have a preference as to who goes first, SMB?
- 00:55:50: <SMB> `destroy EDOFEN- uh, no, I do not have a preference. Whoever would like to respond first may do so.
- 00:56:24: <mg1> Candidates?
- 00:56:40: <Tucayo> I will start
- 00:57:26: <Tucayo> We would continue to cooperate with the AC in the rotation, but our aim will be to boost the votes for those polls with the fewest amount of votes(...)
- 00:58:25: <Tucayo> Right now, one of the polls featured in the Main Page is A25, Favorite Game, considered a major award. Since it's a major award, I'm pretty sure it has no problems with votes.(...)
- 00:59:13: <Tucayo> That is why I would suggest to feature the less-voted awards. Also,they are now in a spot you could easily miss, so of course we need to draw more attention towards them
- 00:59:41: <Tucayo> Done
- 01:00:11: <Tucayo> Oh wait
- 01:00:54: <Tucayo> I forgot to add I will advocate for the Award polls getting another box in the Main Page, but that wouldn't be up to us.
- 01:02:08: <Tucayo> Done
- 01:02:24: <mg1> OK, Dippy?
- 01:05:52: <Crocodile_Dippy> Well I also want to give more attention to awards with lower voter turnout, and encourage people to actually care about those. So yeah, major awards don't need to be rotated much; but I'm very community-oriented, and so is the committee, so I'd probably try to do more for those categories...
- 01:07:06: <Crocodile_Dippy> I am part of the Awards Committee, will be part of it next year, and am very close to several members who are seeking to continue running the committee, so I'll have no problems with communication and coordination. And I've a loud voice and a devoted mindset, so I'd be quite persuasive in getting the awards more attention on the front page
- 01:07:52: <Crocodile_Dippy> after all, who can say no to the australian with the kukri?
- 01:08:08: <Crocodile_Dippy> (ok done)
- 01:08:42: <mg1> OK
- 01:08:51: <mg1> SMB, do you have a follow-up for either (or both) candidates?
- 01:09:18: <SMB> Yes, I do for both candidates (in the same order that they responded to my first question).
- 01:09:46: <SMB> Part of Dippy's response actually also reminded me of something I had meant to ask (the "community-oriented" part).
- 01:10:59: <SMB> The fact of the matter is that many feel that The 'Shroom and Userpedia Awards also lack much of the attention that the other Awards have (although I will not state my personal opinion on this because it probably differs from how other people might feel about it).
- 01:11:11: <SMB> HOWEVER, I would find a response to this interesting nonetheless:
- 01:11:50: <SMB> How would you both plan to get the Userpedia and The 'Shroom Awards more attention without just racking up a ton of uninformed voters?
- 01:14:02: <TerryDactyl> 3Hasn't Tucayo already answered this?
- 01:14:13: <TerryDactyl> 3[02:57] Tucayo We would continue to cooperate with the AC in the rotation, but our aim will be to boost the votes for those polls with the fewest amount of votes(...)
- 01:14:15: <TerryDactyl> 3[02:58] Tucayo Right now, one of the polls featured in the Main Page is A25, Favorite Game, considered a major award. Since it's a major award, I'm pretty sure it has no problems with votes.(...)
- 01:14:17: <TerryDactyl> 3[02:59] Tucayo That is why I would suggest to feature the less-voted awards. Also,they are now in a spot you could easily miss, so of course we need to draw more attention towards them
- 01:15:08: <mg1> I think the question is about users who do not know what The 'Shroom and Userpedia are
- 01:15:13: <SMB> So put it on the Main Page to attract hundreds of people that don't even know what these projects are?
- 01:15:18: <Tucayo> I can elaborate on that
- 01:15:45: <TerryDactyl> 3But in order to prevent that, the projects themselves have to become more notable
- 01:16:19: <Tucayo> I think featuring them in UP is a great way to draw the attention of people who actually know who those are. The real solution here would be to cooperate with other aspects of the community, such as the Core Staff, AC and MW and Userpedia Admins
- 01:17:44: <TerryDactyl> 3We cannot really overestimate our influence,though.
- 01:18:02: <TerryDactyl> 3What we can do is provide some advertising space for those projects
- 01:18:13: <TerryDactyl> 3maybe feature polls that have to do with them
- 01:18:41: <TerryDactyl> 3but ultimately, the increase of attention for those projects lies in the hands of the project leaders themselves.
- 01:18:42: <Crocodile_Dippy> That would be a great idea.
- 01:18:51: <Crocodile_Dippy> *hands up*
- 01:19:55: <Crocodile_Dippy> Basically, this all boils down to collaboration among community projects
- 01:20:55: <Crocodile_Dippy> We should all work together to increase coverage and knowledge of each facet of the community represented in the awards.
- 01:21:42: <Crocodile_Dippy> (improving some of the articles on Userpedia - like Ghost Jam's or Wayoshi's - would certainly be useful in giving people a frame for why these people were chosen for Lifetime Achievement, for instance; we could help them improve those articles)
- 01:23:41: <Crocodile_Dippy> done, by the way
- 01:23:50: <mg1> OK!
- 01:23:51: <Crocodile_Dippy> I mean, this is something that can't just be decided right now
- 01:23:54: <Crocodile_Dippy> it's a complex issue !!
- 01:23:59: <mg1> Thank you!
- 01:24:06: <SMB> Alright, thank you both for answering my question. I got everything I needed to know.
- 01:24:15: <SMB> (thank you three
- 01:24:19: <SMB> **thank you three
- 01:24:20: <SMB> :P
- 01:24:40: <mg1> So, we will now have a five-minute break
- 01:24:49: <mg1> The debate will resume at 9:30 EDT
- 01:24:56: <Crocodile_Dippy> thank you, our audience must be so bored of us now lol
- 01:25:07: <mg1> Feel free to think of questions to ask the cnadidates, based on what you have seen so far
- 01:25:08: <Crocodile_Dippy> 11:30AM for me.
- 01:25:13: <Crocodile_Dippy> other side of the world D)
- 01:25:16: <mg1> Remember, send them to SMB or I via Query
- 01:25:18: <TerryDactyl> 3explode the m!
- 01:25:21: <mg1> And yes, that's why I said EDT
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment