This message is an automatic response from Port25's authentication verifier
service at verifier.port25.com.  The service allows email senders to perform
a simple check of various sender authentication mechanisms.  It is provided
free of charge, in the hope that it is useful to the email community.  While
it is not officially supported, we welcome any feedback you may have at
<verifier-feedback@port25.com>.

Thank you for using the verifier,

The Port25 Solutions, Inc. team

==========================================================
Summary of Results
==========================================================
SPF check:          pass
DomainKeys check:   neutral
DKIM check:         neutral
Sender-ID check:    pass
SpamAssassin check: ham

==========================================================
Details:
==========================================================

HELO hostname:  mail-ig0-f181.google.com
Source IP:      209.85.213.181
mail-from:      raghav@hackindia.io

----------------------------------------------------------
SPF check details:
----------------------------------------------------------
Result:         pass
ID(s) verified: smtp.mailfrom=raghav@hackindia.io
DNS record(s):
    hackindia.io. SPF (no records)
    hackindia.io. 1200 IN TXT "google-site-verification=e3i3pETscw9BIiorwX62MdDpitxazwXQiFzdnLC8vc4"
    hackindia.io. 1200 IN TXT "v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all"
    _spf.google.com. SPF (no records)
    _spf.google.com. 300 IN TXT "v=spf1 include:_netblocks.google.com include:_netblocks2.google.com include:_netblocks3.google.com ~all"
    _netblocks.google.com. SPF (no records)
    _netblocks.google.com. 2854 IN TXT "v=spf1 ip4:64.18.0.0/20 ip4:64.233.160.0/19 ip4:66.102.0.0/20 ip4:66.249.80.0/20 ip4:72.14.192.0/18 ip4:74.125.0.0/16 ip4:173.194.0.0/16 ip4:207.126.144.0/20 ip4:209.85.128.0/17 ip4:216.58.192.0/19 ip4:216.239.32.0/19 ~all"

----------------------------------------------------------
DomainKeys check details:
----------------------------------------------------------
Result:         neutral (message not signed)
ID(s) verified: header.From=raghav@hackindia.io
DNS record(s):

----------------------------------------------------------
DKIM check details:
----------------------------------------------------------
Result:         neutral (message not signed)
ID(s) verified:

NOTE: DKIM checking has been performed based on the latest DKIM specs
(RFC 4871 or draft-ietf-dkim-base-10) and verification may fail for
older versions.  If you are using Port25's PowerMTA, you need to use
version 3.2r11 or later to get a compatible version of DKIM.

----------------------------------------------------------
Sender-ID check details:
----------------------------------------------------------
Result:         pass
ID(s) verified: header.From=raghav@hackindia.io
DNS record(s):
    hackindia.io. SPF (no records)
    hackindia.io. 1200 IN TXT "google-site-verification=e3i3pETscw9BIiorwX62MdDpitxazwXQiFzdnLC8vc4"
    hackindia.io. 1200 IN TXT "v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all"
    _spf.google.com. SPF (no records)
    _spf.google.com. 300 IN TXT "v=spf1 include:_netblocks.google.com include:_netblocks2.google.com include:_netblocks3.google.com ~all"
    _netblocks.google.com. SPF (no records)
    _netblocks.google.com. 2854 IN TXT "v=spf1 ip4:64.18.0.0/20 ip4:64.233.160.0/19 ip4:66.102.0.0/20 ip4:66.249.80.0/20 ip4:72.14.192.0/18 ip4:74.125.0.0/16 ip4:173.194.0.0/16 ip4:207.126.144.0/20 ip4:209.85.128.0/17 ip4:216.58.192.0/19 ip4:216.239.32.0/19 ~all"

----------------------------------------------------------
SpamAssassin check details:
----------------------------------------------------------
SpamAssassin v3.4.0 (2014-02-07)

Result:         ham  (0.4 points, 5.0 required)

 pts rule name              description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3      RBL: Good reputation (+3)
                            [209.85.213.181 listed in wl.mailspike.net]
-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
-1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
                            [score: 0.0000]
 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
-0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL      Mailspike good senders
 2.3 EMPTY_MESSAGE          Message appears to have no textual parts and no
                            Subject: text

==========================================================
Explanation of the possible results (from RFC 5451)
==========================================================

SPF and Sender-ID Results
=========================

"none"
      No policy records were published at the sender's DNS domain.

"neutral"
      The sender's ADMD has asserted that it cannot or does not
      want to assert whether or not the sending IP address is authorized
      to send mail using the sender's DNS domain.

"pass"
      The client is authorized by the sender's ADMD to inject or
      relay mail on behalf of the sender's DNS domain.

"policy"
     The client is authorized to inject or relay mail on behalf
      of the sender's DNS domain according to the authentication
      method's algorithm, but local policy dictates that the result is
      unacceptable.

"fail"
      This client is explicitly not authorized to inject or
      relay mail using the sender's DNS domain.

"softfail"
      The sender's ADMD believes the client was not authorized
      to inject or relay mail using the sender's DNS domain, but is
      unwilling to make a strong assertion to that effect.

"temperror"
      The message could not be verified due to some error that
      is likely transient in nature, such as a temporary inability to
      retrieve a policy record from DNS.  A later attempt may produce a
      final result.

"permerror"
      The message could not be verified due to some error that
      is unrecoverable, such as a required header field being absent or
      a syntax error in a retrieved DNS TXT record.  A later attempt is
      unlikely to produce a final result.


DKIM and DomainKeys Results
===========================

"none"
      The message was not signed.

"pass"
      The message was signed, the signature or signatures were
      acceptable to the verifier, and the signature(s) passed
      verification tests.

"fail"
      The message was signed and the signature or signatures were
      acceptable to the verifier, but they failed the verification
      test(s).

"policy"
      The message was signed but the signature or signatures were
      not acceptable to the verifier.

"neutral"
      The message was signed but the signature or signatures
      contained syntax errors or were not otherwise able to be
      processed.  This result SHOULD also be used for other
      failures not covered elsewhere in this list.

"temperror"
      The message could not be verified due to some error that
      is likely transient in nature, such as a temporary inability
      to retrieve a public key.  A later attempt may produce a
      final result.

"permerror"
      The message could not be verified due to some error that
      is unrecoverable, such as a required header field being
      absent. A later attempt is unlikely to produce a final result.


==========================================================
Original Email
==========================================================

Return-Path: <raghav@hackindia.io>
Received: from mail-ig0-f181.google.com (209.85.213.181) by verifier.port25.com id hi9go020i3g1 for <check-auth@verifier.port25.com>; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 05:29:36 -0400 (envelope-from <raghav@hackindia.io>)
Authentication-Results: verifier.port25.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=raghav@hackindia.io
Authentication-Results: verifier.port25.com; domainkeys=neutral (message not signed) header.From=raghav@hackindia.io
Authentication-Results: verifier.port25.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed)
Authentication-Results: verifier.port25.com; sender-id=pass header.From=raghav@hackindia.io
Received: by igcur8 with SMTP id ur8so58701214igc.0
        for <check-auth@verifier.port25.com>; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 02:29:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type;
        bh=pntNawSro0I0JkwkhYPF3PHN9f+kCCNHPKyzZgqRifE=;
        b=KF265DCeYHfshPuqEKbVfRhK9Ns/9YCrKjvhue4dsD7WMRdcsoVS8fI+ceUc8k7VZK
         YV0LGfLjHqHyVG9XbMUdvvvFVJYpwNdXTzE4Zf2yH9uy+UOXwnuxlgOdlKiE6enz4o+/
         TptEBeQ8CO6Y0feMbFJCuJXcyiFADV4lbTb5M8zfcrcZFcZFqrano8HfZS+Cvpul26zR
         Db6VcwlOf2XkI5+EIKWFlOrhGsWEBOUBLPdtzSNqiNWx0vsnmDerO1/f3RYK8rzMUZ8T
         XMufxDtvBCTMTAWXSh1p4GvgYLwmbzsM+JRCR0nziPYFTwJeyErPI1vMHYVJBUZz/v1g
         yjTQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlQ1tmArbJlxl5eK97pvSydYo2nHZvpU2GdD506RZ8J9MfEaw4XiRMrEaqDcCNfE0rdT4M7
X-Received: by 10.42.175.74 with SMTP id az10mr25150474icb.55.1435656575432;
        Tue, 30 Jun 2015 02:29:35 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <raghav@hackindia.io>
Received: from mail-ig0-f173.google.com (mail-ig0-f173.google.com. [209.85.213.173])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id rr5sm7407658igb.7.2015.06.30.02.29.34
        for <check-auth@verifier.port25.com>
        (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
        Tue, 30 Jun 2015 02:29:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by igblr2 with SMTP id lr2so8310640igb.0
        for <check-auth@verifier.port25.com>; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 02:29:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.50.79.230 with SMTP id m6mr22391640igx.46.1435656574693;
 Tue, 30 Jun 2015 02:29:34 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Raghav Sood <raghav@hackindia.io>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 09:29:22 +0000
Message-ID: <CAL+93+Cf+nXaykpXGUFuEW_TBe-H6NyV_8NjjGhWoAjWipHpXA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:
To: spf-test@openspf.org, check-auth@verifier.port25.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e01229aaa2787250519b8d830

--089e01229aaa2787250519b8d830
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8



--089e01229aaa2787250519b8d830
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8

<div dir="ltr"><br></div>

--089e01229aaa2787250519b8d830--