There are a number of very suspicious things that occurred this year. Charles Lieber and a few Chinese nationals were arrested due to fraud and scientific espionage. China maintains a program called the "Thousand Talents Plan", which is designed to recruit foreign scientists with bribery and convince them to divulge proprietary information to the Chinese, giving them a strategic technological advantage.
Charles Lieber has been working at Harvard on silicon nanowire tech for the past 22 years, and with nanotech and nanoscale structures in general for even longer than that. He was arrested All of his publications are readily available:
Many of his papers describe using silicon nanowires as the basis of BCIs, or brain-computer interfaces, a.k.a. "Neural Lace" tech, like Neuralink (which is similar, but uses electrodes that are much larger and much more primitive than nanowires).
Silicon nanowire field effect transistors, or SiNW-FETs, are transistorized silicon nanowires. They're extremely small, on the order of a few micrometers long by a few nanometers thick. They are small enough to be coated with HIV TAT peptides and slipped right through the membrane of a cell.
Once inside, they're capable of reading signals from (and modulating the activity of) individual neurons. How does one power them if they're inside cells and have no batteries, capacitors, or other power source? Simple. RF induction.
What device is capable of directing RF of the required frequency directly into someone's head? A phased-array beamforming antenna, capable of steering beams of RF towards anything with high precision. What uses phased-array beamforming antennas? Fifth-generation wireless cell networks do.
They even have a 600 MHz band in their bandplan that can penetrate tissue very deeply (millimeter-wave frequencies only penetrate the skin to a depth measured in millimeters).
Just one little problem left. How to get the nanowires into the brain, past the blood-brain barrier. Normally, the BBB keeps foreign objects out of your brain tissue. There is one thing, however, that compromises the BBB very handily. SARS-CoV-2 Spike proteins. You see, COVID-19 is a vascular endotheliitis. This virus attacks the lining of people's blood vessels. That's why it causes blood clots, heart attacks, pulmonary edema, and all these other weird symptoms that one would never expect from a pneumonia. Its manifestations are protean because blood vessels are everywhere in the body. This is why it seems like an "everything-virus" that can impact every organ; it can cause viremia and inflammation in many different vital organs, as well as aggressive coagulopathy and neutrophilia.
SARS-CoV-2 Spike proteins, on their own, even without the rest of the virus (even the shed spike proteins) can injure the blood-brain barrier and make it more permeable.
SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines contain a bit of mRNA suspended in a lipid capsule. These enter your cells, and then, your ribosomes take the mRNA and manufacture copies of SARS-CoV-2's Spike protein. This Spike protein acts as an antigen, training the immune system to detect it and form antibodies against it, like a typical vaccine, however, as described above, these free-floating Spike proteins may also compromise the BBB.
Now, what do you suppose would happen if someone with a compromised blood-brain barrier happened to have a bunch of silicon nanowires injected into their bloodstream?
Klaus Schwab openly professes transhumanist leanings in his books, even describing the use of mind-reading to determine people's level of security threat:
Canada's "global reset plan" involved confiscating property and shoving people into cities.
This is how it works: the federal government will offer to eliminate all personal debts (mortgages, loans, credit cards, etc) which all funding will be provided to Canada by the IMF under what will become known as the World Debt Reset program. In exchange for acceptance of this total debt forgiveness the individual would forfeit ownership of any and all property and assets forever.
All of this "Great Reset" nonsense seems rather nonsensical, until you realize that the goal is to force people to move from rural areas into denser, more populated areas, which would make them easier to influence with a Smart Grid (putting the necessary infrastructure in rural areas is too expensive).
On 4chan, someone claiming to be part of one of the wealthy families outright stated that smart-grid mind control involving 5G was on the way, and people needed to be forced into the cities for that very reason (though they were reticent to explain exactly how the technology would work):
Bonus mind control craziness this year linked to Betsy DeVos (the sister of Erik Prince, of Blackwater/Academi fame), Neurocore, Blackrock, and the use of old-school Utah Arrays:
COVID-19 provides the perfect excuse. It creates an international emergency justifying the use of emergency powers. It creates a pretense for people to be injected with unknown substances without their knowledge or consent, believing that they have been vaccinated. It demonstrates quite aptly why there has been so much well-poisoning about 5G and anti-vaxxers; though 5G technology on its own is not particularly harmful, and though vaccines are a proven technology that do confer immunity to viruses, this particular application of 5G and vaccines may have nefarious intent behind it. Namely, acting as a trojan horse for nanotechnological mind control. Silicon nanowires degrade over time, so naturally, SARS-CoV-2 immunity cannot be long-lasting; there must be an excuse for continuous, yearly "vaccinations", which will contain both the actual mRNA vaccine protecting against the virus, but also, silicon nanowires. The Spike proteins will compromise the blood-brain barrier every single time, allowing the nanowires through into the brain tissue. Then, the 5G towers energize and control the nanowires by RF induction. All of the necessary elements of a functioning mind-control device are present, and they're openly described in publicly-available scientific papers.
Currently, the large size and small number of electrodes in BMIs limits their stimulation and measurement resolution. State-of-the-art devices for DBS typically have 4–8 millimeter-sized electrodes (Stanslaski et al., 2012), whereas BMIs for neural recording typically use a few dozen electrodes that are 10–100 microns in diameter (Hochberg et al., 2006; Donoghue et al., 2007; Du et al., 2011) (Figure 1A). This density and feature size is a far cry from that of the human brain, which contains approximately one hundred billion neurons, each with diameter as fine as 10 microns (Williams and Herrup, 1988). In fact, a single square millimeter of brain tissue contains approximately one million neurons (Williams and Herrup, 1988). To match this number and density, future BMIs must feature smaller and denser electrode arrays in order to precisely monitor and control neural circuit activity. Furthermore, smaller electrodes (<1 micron in diameter) may also enable the recording of intracellular electrical signals of individual neurons (Figure 1A): compared to extracellular recording, these intracellular measurements will have improved signal to noise ratio and enable a clear cell-to-electrode registry (Figures 1B–D). Importantly, the improved signal to noise ratio also enables intracellular electrodes to record subthreshold neural activity (e.g., postsynaptic potentials) that can be used to determine the strength of synaptic connectivity.
The Internet comprises a decentralized global system that serves humanity’s collective effort to generate, process, and store data, most of which is handled by the rapidly expanding cloud. A stable, secure, real-time system may allow for interfacing the cloud with the human brain. One promising strategy for enabling such a system, denoted here as a “human brain/cloud interface” (“B/CI”), would be based on technologies referred to here as “neuralnanorobotics.” Future neuralnanorobotics technologies are anticipated to facilitate accurate diagnoses and eventual cures for the ∼400 conditions that affect the human brain. Neuralnanorobotics may also enable a B/CI with controlled connectivity between neural activity and external data storage and processing, via the direct monitoring of the brain’s ∼86 × 109 neurons and ∼2 × 1014 synapses. Subsequent to navigating the human vasculature, three species of neuralnanorobots (endoneurobots, gliabots, and synaptobots) could traverse the blood–brain barrier (BBB), enter the brain parenchyma, ingress into individual human brain cells, and autoposition themselves at the axon initial segments of neurons (endoneurobots), within glial cells (gliabots), and in intimate proximity to synapses (synaptobots). They would then wirelessly transmit up to ∼6 × 1016 bits per second of synaptically processed and encoded human–brain electrical information via auxiliary nanorobotic fiber optics (30 cm3) with the capacity to handle up to 1018 bits/sec and provide rapid data transfer to a cloud based supercomputer for real-time brain-state monitoring and data extraction. A neuralnanorobotically enabled human B/CI might serve as a personalized conduit, allowing persons to obtain direct, instantaneous access to virtually any facet of cumulative human knowledge. Other anticipated applications include myriad opportunities to improve education, intelligence, entertainment, traveling, and other interactive experiences. A specialized application might be the capacity to engage in fully immersive experiential/sensory experiences, including what is referred to here as “transparent shadowing” (TS). Through TS, individuals might experience episodic segments of the lives of other willing participants (locally or remote) to, hopefully, encourage and inspire improved understanding and tolerance among all members of the human family.
None of the computation would need to be done on the nanowires themselves. They would merely act as a brain-computer interface. All of the actual mind control would be done with cloud computing architecture, likely using machine-learning programs that observe societal stressors and manipulate people to make them more docile, more compliant, less likely to join populist movements, less likely to rebel against unfair economic conditions, and so on and so forth. It wouldn't be anything precise or subtle like implanting false memories or getting you to forget certain things, at least not at first. It would be general things, like Pavlovian conditioning through direct control of human emotions. The controllers of such a system could make someone hate anyone they liked, love anyone they liked, and so on and so forth. Democracy would be rendered utterly pointless.
Julian Assange tried warning us:
IOT and Smart Dust sound like innocuous buzzwords until you realize that they want this stuff INSIDE people.
Harvesting the energy to run these things from GSM networks is already something that they've proposed in these papers.
We're in some real trouble, here. We need to raise awareness on this unspeakably evil shit as much as possible.