Right, so if you happen to be allergic to rant/raves on the subjects of physics, philosophy, or logic then you probably shouldn't read this post. If that is not the case than I'll be interested in knowing your opinion.

The Question: What is random?
While the definition of random varies according to the context, it is generally understood to describe behavior that does not follow a set pattern, or set of rules.
I like to simplify the definition as the condition where the output of of system is not related to the input of the system. (not system as in computer)

Let's examine these standard dice. Each has 6 faces numbered from 1-6. Assuming that the dice are perfectly square, and of the same density throughout, you'd think that when you throw one the results will be completely random.

Posted Image

However, if we examine the example as a system, and identify the input and output of this system, we will see that that is not the case.
The output of the system is the number (1-6) on the top of the dice. The input is the way that you throw the dice.
If we were to throw the dice in exactly the same way 100 times, the result would be exactly the same all 100 times.

This shows that the output of the system is directly related to the input. Thus the system is not random.
This brings to light an important principle: we perceive as random the things over which we have no conscious control.

Thus things like the weather, the stock market, and the winning lottery numbers are not random, but merely out of our control.


With that as an example, why don't you try and find something that is truly random.

***cricket sounds***

yep, that's right. Couldn't think of anything could you? That's because there is no such thing as random. Everything that we see around us is the effect, and only possible effect, of a previous cause. Which is in turn, itself the effect of a previous cause.

That is known as causality.

If we follow this line of thought we will view of the universe as a chain of events flowing according to the laws of cause and effect. Arguments about determinism and existentialism aside, (those that deal with the concept of free will) this still appears to present an problem. A large and terrible problem. Namely: That this requires some sort of event without a cause to get the whole system started.

This is the problem that religions "solve" by attributing this initial cause to a supernatural entity. However, there is no indication that this is the case, and this only postpones the problem and solves nothing. (what is the cause that caused the cause the caused the universe?)

I have not found any simple explanation to this dilemma. (and all the ones that are not bullshit tend to be simple)

But, yesterday a thought came to me... a very simple and interesting little thought.


And i will share it with you guys if you tell me your opinions on my thoughts so far....