API tools faq
paste
Lesta

8 Lesta Nediam LNC2016-08-27 1055 +Brian Hill

Lesta
Aug 26th, 2016
94
0
Never
Add comment
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 2.71 KB | None | 0 0
raw download clone embed print report
  1. Lesta Nediam LNC2016-08-27 1055 +Brian Hill
  2. https://plus.google.com/u/0/+LestaNediamHQ/posts/UF7VXGfdvQt
  3. https://pastebin.com/YJpspYHj
  4. __
  5.  
  6. +Brian Hill __ If sufficient proof has been presented - _and it qualifies_ (see my G+ post about the French gymnast who broke his leg for an example of "sufficient proof that qualifies") - then you must accept it. *Even if it means on occasion you are wrong*.
  7.  
  8.  
  9.  
  10. The same approach must be taken with claims about "CGI". If something *does not need* to be CGI and there is no indication/sign of CGI - then we must not think of it as CGI (even if it is).
  11.  
  12.  
  13.  
  14. It is necessary to be wrong *on occasion* to avoid falling into thinking traps that will lead us to be wrong *more often than not*.
  15.  
  16.  
  17.  
  18. When it comes to the lie system *the audience is not going to be presented with sufficient proof* because that is how the trick is being done.
  19.  
  20.  
  21.  
  22. To suddenly start showing sufficient proof to the audience would render the lie system ineffective.
  23.  
  24.  
  25.  
  26. This point does not seem to be understood by you (not a criticism - just an observation). This point needs to be understood: sufficient proof for lie system events/claims is intentionally and systematically withheld because the point is to force your imagination to fill in the blanks and convince yourself.
  27.  
  28.  
  29.  
  30. If you keep looking for "sufficient proof" then what will happen is you find proof's appearances. That leads to the "gotcha moments" that later turn out to be nothing. Agents against truth exploit these "gotchas" by talking about them as though they're genuine.
  31.  
  32.  
  33.  
  34. The "two images" is a good example.
  35.  
  36.  
  37.  
  38. Each time a "gotcha" is presented and then later debunked it demoralises the "truther". Eventually the truther thinks "hang on - everything gets debunked - there is no conspiracy". And they become "reformed hoaxtards" and convert into "event realists" etc.
  39.  
  40.  
  41.  
  42. __
  43.  
  44.  
  45.  
  46. If footage of an earthquake is indistinguishable from a natural earthquake then that's as far as you can go. You cannot assert it's not natural (and you would need to justify why you think it's not natural if you wish to make that claim - but making that effort would be foolish in my opinion).
  47.  
  48.  
  49.  
  50. __
  51.  
  52.  
  53.  
  54. (As usual - typing quickly!)
  55.  
  56. ______________________________________________________________
  57. My name is Lesta Nediam and I am cracking reality like a nut.
  58.  
  59. Lesta Nediam's YouTube Channel:
  60. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w
  61.  
  62. Lesta Nediam's Google Plus:
  63. https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ
  64.  
  65. Lesta Nediam's Twitter:
  66. https://twitter.com/LestaNediam
  67.  
  68. Lesta Nediam's Public Comments:
  69. https://pastebin.com/u/Lesta
  70.  
  71. What does not exist - exists to exist.
  72. What exists - exists to always exist.
  73. As it is written - so it is done.
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Public Pastes
We use cookies for various purposes including analytics. By continuing to use Pastebin, you agree to our use of cookies as described in the Cookies Policy.  OK, I Understand
Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!