A Grand Primer on 4G Grand Strategy

A Grand Primer on 4G Grand Strategy

First, let's go over the definitions. Every generations of warfare have more dimensions added on top. So, let's go over examples to better illustrate my point:

1st gen warfare: You have an army or tribal group or warband against another one. You get archers, cavalry, and men with swords, rushing at each-others. Now the optimal strategy depends largely on the terrain, this is the first dimension of the war. If you have the high ground, you'd send your infantry down and keep your archers up as to let arrows rain on your enemy, if it is a flat terrain and the opponent has less infantry than you do, you would most likely attempt to flank them. If you have the element of surprise, encircling them is the optimal method. Anyways, you get my point. This is field warfare 101. Now you have to add castles, sieges, and defense on top of that, which forms the second dimension. The third dimension is a lot more important: Attrition, you're going to want to starve your enemy and cost them as much as you can. Burning and pillaging, classical methods to do just that, Russian scorched earth strategy, all that jazz. It's not that complex, once you get the hang of it.

2nd gen warfare: It is functionally the same as the first gen warfare, but you add gunpowder over it. You replace siege catapults, trebuchets and balistas with canons, you replace the basic infantry with gun wielding infantry. The archer is functionally replaced by the canon and other artillery pieces, and the cavalry becomes essentially only a flanking tool, and is as such a lot less necessary than it was before. Naval warfare is also a lot more important, you now have cannon boats and all that jazz.

3rd gen warfare: Post 1850-war. Add railways, automatic rifles, planes. The focus shifts from taking over centers (Castles, Forts, Cities) to rather at destroying the opposing side's economy and infrastructure. It's the beginning of "Modern" warfare. If we look at the American Civil War, it forms the first "Modern" war, the beginning of trench warfare, the use of railways. WW2 would be the best example. The way to win the war was entirely dependent on damaging the economy of the Fascists and their infrastructure. Hence the use of bombs. Third gen warfare is more of destabilization and progress.

So, what makes 4th gen warfare so different? Let's look at Aghanistan. We technically won the war in Afghanistan... If we consider it by 3rd gen warfare terms. See, we crushed their government, made the Taliban disapear from the map. Let me ask you, do you think Aghan people like the USA? They fucking hate the USA, they hate Israel and they hate Shias. And it's not blind hate, we ARE their enemies. We made their whole government fall. Afghanistan belongs to islamic mercenaries more than it belongs to us. As soon as we pull out, it's no longer a "peaceful country". Not that it ever was.

Let's look at Libya. We killed Muhammar Gaddhafi on false pretenses, we obviously orchestrated a false revolution. Guess who Libya now belongs to? Oh, that's right. Islamic mercenaries and the Muslim Brotherhood. We saw that happen over and over again. We won nothing, we keep losing. Because we're hated.

See, traditional warfare, you would conquer a territory, either expel, kill or adopt its population. Now, all we do, is we crush a government and leave an empty spot... That Islamic terrorists love to fill. We functionally lose on the long term, we keep making enemies. Our enemies grow bolder, and we keep fighting the same stupid wars for Israel. Short thing short, what is 4G warfare? It's a war of opinions and economy. You want to demoralize your opponent and take his wealth, or in the case of the Alt-Right and our fellow good goyim, we want to destroy the jews' infrastructure and demoralize them. Drive them to the point of insanity. Take their wealth. And put a leash back on them. I ultimately care very little about the genocide of jews, I care about if they are with us or against us. And currently, they're against us. And it bothers me very much. Very, very much.

Now don't go call me an antisemitic piece of shit. The antisemite label is used only to shut us up. It's bullshit. And that's an example of efficient jewish mind control. We ULTIMATELY want to make friends, not enemies, and drive the public our way. Someday fellow white people grow too bold and they give birth to another Timothy McVeigh, whose actions are a despicable but natural reaction to a bold jewry. Terrorism is a move used only by a party who has no tool, no army, no infrastructure, and /nothing to lose/. Most important point. The more jews drive us to the edge, the more you see siegetards. The more siegetards you see, the more likely you start to see far-right terrorism, and that ultimately is a very destabilizing factor for the government, it slows public debate, it destroys infrastructure, it's costly, and there is nothing you can do to prevent it.

Timothy McVeigh, ultimately, was a man of honor. You may consider him just a terrorist, he's the sole terrorist that stalled entire American policymaking. The man, alone, died a martyr. Great injustices done by the American government and their allies give strength to people who have ultimately nothing to lose... Like our Irish friend. I do not advocate for violence. I never have, I never will. However, terrorism is an essentially part of 4th generation warfare, coming directly after organization. It is not a technique that we will use, but it is a technique that oftentimes work. If we look at irregular warfares fought in Islamic countries, and Shi'ites in the past, terror was always the main tool they used. They have no budget, but they LOOK scary as fuck, and bring the opinion of muslims to the favor of them. Muslims see us as a bunch of degenerates, and frankly, that's what we are. And this is why they are so bold. The bolder (((they))) are, the bolder we ultimately become. If TImothy McVeigh did what he did, he did it as he saw great injustices done against people like him, and was willing to die for a greater cause than himself. He is, ultimately, a fascist, as this is what fascists do.

If we want to get anywhere, we need long term planning. We need grand strategy, good optics, and ways to keep afloat economically.

What I mean by Grand Strategy is long term strategy lasting 10 to 20 years, if not more. Most actions we make, as we're in a democratic country, are illogical and short sighted. We need long term planning, we need to lose the democratic lie, and we need organization. My personal view is that we will need to find someone who can keep their power levels under control, so neither Ricky Vaughn, neither Anglin, neither Azzmador or Heimbach. We will need an outsider, a local politician that is on our side, overtly or not. We will groom this local politician to national prominence, and with that we will have someone we can cont on. We need to do this not with a single politician, but with multiple politicians. If you are able to keep your power levels under control, you apply, join the republican party or the democrat party. What side you are on does NOT matter, what matters is if you get elected. We are fascists, we will be subversive and use the traditional methods (((other people))) did. Subvert from the inside, on the outside. Try to do this in a year? You can't. Impossible. We'll need many decades to get to our inevitable goal, victory, whether Israel gets their Great Israel plans done or not.

On the point of optics, we see it talked a lot about in our circles. Ricky Vaughn, ultimately a very divisive and, in my view, a very harmful force, is partly right about those. We need to look good, and have a controlled message. Hitler was a master of controlled propaganda, if we look at pictures of the Reich's marches, they looked like you and me, they didn't look violent. They acted like normal people. The only thing jews show us of the Reich are military marches, which were important. But Military marches are propaganda tools as to look scary to your enemies, it is now how you get elected. Most people seem to not understand that.

On the point of economics, we need to have jobs. We need companies to help us if we get fired. We need our own companies. And we also need to infiltrate multinationals. The great companies like Walmart and Coca Cola are the papacy, we need to subvert them from the inside, as they will secure job stability, and possible sovereignty for our people. Should we fail to do so, all we worked towards goes to waste, lack of money to keep afloat is the most dangerous thing that can happen to us. As not having a job will make us obedient. Either we stay anonymous, or we start to infiltrate and subvert every companies we can.

I have a personal sweet spot for secret societies, and it's clear that we will need a level of secrecy in the future. A semi-secret group is necessary, encrypted mailing lists for members of the republican party are an option. We have multiple ways we can do it, ultimately we will need a lot more organization, we must lose the chance of any future Cvilles happening, and we need to distance ourselves from troublemakers immediately. People who are not serious, who pick drama, who act like filthy jews like Weev does, people like Andrew Anglin who'se sole focus is their own looks, people like Azzmador who criticize goon walks while organizing their own. All of them, either disavow them entirely or ignore them. They ARE not serious, disavow the Alt-Right label, it has no future. If anyone in the Alt-Right is a serious person, it's Nicholas J Fuentes, young, smart, and incredibly autistic. He looks good, is well behaved, and more importantly, doesn't pick fights. He is the sort of people we must model after. If someone has a single piece of drama in their personal life that journos can pick up, we must, inevitably distance ourselves from them. We must lose any future Heimbachs before they are a trouble. Ex prisoners are avoided. Stormfags ignored. We need to rebuild entirely, ahve structure, organization, and the diligence to keep at it.

---------------------------------------

This is my second revision of my primer of 4G Grand Strategy. If you have any constructive criticism to send me, either gab me @gutfuckllc on gab, or shoot me an email at [email protected]