API tools faq
paste
Lesta

4 Lesta Nediam LNC2017-02-27 0945 +Brian Hill

Lesta
Feb 26th, 2017
137
0
Never
Add comment
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 4.48 KB | None | 0 0
raw download clone embed print report
  1. Lesta Nediam LNC2017-02-27 0945 +Brian Hill
  2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s7CRsxTn2vQ&google_comment_id=z13zzdwyxqztebzwb04cilhazmbucdmpelw0k
  3. https://pastebin.com/YCMFAYY0
  4. __
  5.  
  6. +Brian Hill __ *I sat through your video and didn't see any bank records/transactions that prove "Peekay" to be a "paid shill"*.
  7.  
  8.  
  9.  
  10. Perhaps you suggest he "shills" for free out of a sense of duty and/or charity?!
  11.  
  12.  
  13.  
  14. Remind me again what your "objective proof" that *categorically proved* (*without requiring a subjective/biased interpretation*) "Peekay" to be a "paid/charitable shill who is *intentionally* presenting bad observations".
  15.  
  16.  
  17.  
  18. In the absence of that evidence we cannot *assert as a fact about reality* that he is definitely a "shill".
  19.  
  20.  
  21.  
  22. _He may well be *but we cannot claim it*_.
  23.  
  24.  
  25.  
  26. What we *can* claim about "Peekay" is what we *can* objectively prove about him. And that is his *undeniable incompetence*.
  27.  
  28.  
  29.  
  30. "Peekay" is so incompetent that he is naturally operating his own "mini-lie system" which is why everything he presents can be doubted in the first place.
  31.  
  32.  
  33.  
  34. But you keep making the fallacy of the conspiracy theorist by thinking it is proof of something. Have you learned nothing - "Brian Hill"? Have you really made *zero progress* in the two plus years that I have been aware of your existence?
  35.  
  36.  
  37.  
  38. You say that I am "muddying the issue" but I am not. *I am being precise*.
  39.  
  40.  
  41.  
  42. You say that I am "Australian controlled opposition" but I am not. Where is your proof for that claim beyond an erroneous subjective interpretation that is the consequence of unchecked paranoia?
  43.  
  44.  
  45.  
  46. It seems - "Mr Hill" - that you are as *unhinged* and *paranoid* as ever. (At least you acknowledge the possibility of being paranoid in your video.)
  47.  
  48.  
  49.  
  50. Every time you make these *unsubstantiated claims* you undermine any valid claims you may have also made. And so if anyone is "muddying an issue" it is *YOU*.
  51.  
  52.  
  53.  
  54. Sure - everything that "Peekay" says and does is what we would expect a "shill" to say and do. *But it is also what we can expect from someone with a low IQ and the incompetence that results from it*.
  55.  
  56.  
  57.  
  58. I am pointing out that we *can* prove "Peekay" to be incompetent. He is and it is undeniable. And that's just as good a reason to not pay attention to him than if he were an actual "shill" (which *has not* been proved).
  59.  
  60.  
  61.  
  62. But as always - due to subjective sour grapes - you just cannot bring yourself to agree with Lesta and are allowing your rampant *paranoia* to take things too far yet again. You are again making unsound conclusions because of faulty premises.
  63.  
  64.  
  65.  
  66. If you are correct that "Peekay" is an actual "shill" (and he may well be) then it is because of luck and accident *and not because of anything you have presented*.
  67.  
  68.  
  69.  
  70. _As you were_.
  71.  
  72.  
  73.  
  74.  
  75.  
  76.  
  77.  
  78. __________
  79.  
  80.  
  81.  
  82. +Brian Hill __ By the way - "Mr Hill" - I had banned you because you are an *unrelenting agitator* who does not know when - or how - to listen to reason. Over the years I have banned you several times _for that reason_.
  83.  
  84.  
  85. Unlike a certain loudmouthed loser calling himself "Peekay HIDES Truth" I clean out my "banned list" from time to time in order to give people another chance.
  86.  
  87.  
  88. This thread - however - has reminded me that you have made *no progress*. None. Neither as a critic of "truther personalities" on YouTube nor as an "event skeptic" of news presentations.
  89.  
  90.  
  91. You are making the same mistakes as I saw you making a year ago.
  92.  
  93.  
  94. Much like "Peekay HIDES Truth" you are *provably incompetent*. Your conclusions are governed by *erroneous subjective interpretation* which is more often than not the result of your *unchecked paranoia*.
  95.  
  96.  
  97. Much like "Peekay HIDES Truth" the resulting incompetence is what makes *you* indistinguishable from a "shill".
  98.  
  99.  
  100. On that note - I noticed you didn't censor your email address at all points throughout the video. Is "BrianTheHills" your dyslexic way of writing *"shill the brain"*? With a damaged brain like yours - it could be!
  101.  
  102.  
  103. _Good day, dummy!_
  104.  
  105.  
  106.  
  107.  
  108. ______________________________________________________________
  109. My name is Lesta Nediam and I am cracking reality like a nut.
  110.  
  111. Lesta Nediam's YouTube Channel:
  112. https://www.youtube.com/c/LestaNediamHQ
  113.  
  114. Lesta Nediam's Google Plus:
  115. https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ
  116.  
  117. Lesta Nediam's Twitter:
  118. https://twitter.com/LestaNediam
  119.  
  120. Lesta Nediam's Public Comments:
  121. https://pastebin.com/u/Lesta
  122.  
  123. What does not exist - exists to exist.
  124. What exists - exists to always exist.
  125. As it is written - so it is done.
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Public Pastes
We use cookies for various purposes including analytics. By continuing to use Pastebin, you agree to our use of cookies as described in the Cookies Policy.  OK, I Understand
Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!