/vanguardist/ Manifesto:

/vanguardist/ Manifesto:

INTRODUCTION

Everything fertile begins with a circle. The circle of conspirators make the conspiracy. The circle of capitalists make the modern corporation. The circle of families make the polity. The circle of Jews make the Synagogue.

/pol/ too is a circle. A circle of memesters. But /pol/ is a circle which is nameless, and in so much as it remains nameless it remains infertile. For the power of the human circle is in the relationships between its members; and a circle whose members share nothing with one another, is a circle in name only. An emasculated oval.

So what is to be done, frens? Simply: we must transcend /pol/ and its anonymous culture. We must take our place as the vanguard of the Western civilization, working together, tirelessly, shoulder-to-shoulder in order to subvert and ascend the clown world.

Now, you may ask: why must we meet one another to do this? Why can't we remain anonymous? We've made quite a bit of progress memeing from the anonymous safety of 4chan.

To answer this you must examine the nature of power. Power is in relationships. A man wandering a desert, alone, is not powerful, no matter how many tokens of power he may possess. A man crying out anonymously in the crowd, no matter the truth of what he shouts, is not powerful until the crowd begins to know him.

Power is not in the people, nor does it come from the people. This is the central fallacy of our democratic age: that power comes from the people, or that the people are sovereign. The people are no such thing. The people, as we have seen, will simply follow whichever class wields the most power and influence. The so-called 'power' of the people is simply to assent to whatever the ruling class proposes, or else to ignore it because it's never placed before them. For the ruling classes determine, through their various media and educational organs, what is and is not acceptable to talk about, what is or is not put to the people for debate.

So we must ask: where, if not from the people, does power come from? And we will answer: power comes from wealth; power comes from solid relationships; power comes from institutional control; power comes from credibility; power comes from knowledge.

So long as you do not possess the above, you are not powerful. Can we be honest about ourselves? Can we admit to ourselves that the majority of /pol/acks today do not possess those things, and that even if they do they are wandering alone in the desert of the modern clown world? Or will we continue with this delusion that we are powerful, that our memes shouted by nameless trolls with no reputation are making a difference?

WHAT WE ARE AGAINST

- We are against anonymity in the circle, for the reasons aforesaid. So long as we remain nameless and dependent upon a platform which our enemy allows us to have, we remain powerless to effectively organize. Anon must get acquainted with anon or no genuine circle can form. Whether this be on the basis of real names or on the basis of pseudonyms is left up to individual cells.

- We are against accelerationism if it means terrorism, illegal acts, or anything which jeopardizes the circle. For the circle depends, as we have seen, on relationships; and relationships, if they are to be fertile, depend upon reputation. What could be more offensive to society than murder, than terrorism? What could more seriously harm ones reputation than association with these things?

- We are for subversion, for memes. Everything which can be done legally to subvert existing elites must be done, whether anonymously or otherwise.

- We are against cowardice and paranoia. Anyone who thinks the FBI will lock him up simply for meeting and talking with frens is no fren of ours.

WHAT WE ARE FOR

- We are for discretion and secrecy outside of the circle. History has shown that close-knit conspiracies are the most likely to succeed. Elite Jews depend upon insularity, and the Mafia thrived on secrecy. Lenin, perhaps the most successful revolutionary in history, built his whole efforts around a secret vanguard of elite revolutionaries.

- We are for accelerationism if it means careful and legal subversion of the existing order by a close-knit conspiracy of /pol/acks. What brings about the flagrant exposure of the contradictions within the existing order is fair game, and advisable, so long as it is legal.

- We are for skepticism and vetting. Vanguardists should take care who they're willing to trust. Frens must be vetted. They must be willing to take the schvitz with Paulie.

- We are for the collective seeking of economic power. /pol/acks must build companies, professional networks, anything which increases our collective wealth. No /pol/ack should be unemployed, and if a fren has connections it should be shared. We must help our own.

- We are for the collective seeking of institutional power. We want networks of /pol/ack lawyers, accountants, professors, and members of every professional class aggressively promoting one another up the corporate and social hierarchy. This is how the elites of today came to power, it is how we must come to power.

- We are for the collective seeking of political power. For now, in the USA, this must begin at the extreme local level: imagine school-boards, trade unions, local political parties, mayorships, all controlled by /pol/acks. This is not a pipe dream: our numbers make this possible, if only we had the will and the organization.

- We are for smallness. The smaller your cell, the better. We imagine thousands of small sized (5-15 members) cells of highly organized, highly intelligent, close-knit /pol/acks operating across the USA, aggressively seeking all kinds of power, ultimately for the advancement of the ethnostate.