Guest User

Untitled

a guest
Feb 18th, 2018
93
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 2.30 KB | None | 0 0
  1. ---------------------------------------------
  2.  
  3. Hey Buddy.
  4.  
  5. I'm unsure why you think the age of a study determines its value. Such an assumption is flat wrong, please don't think Chimera was correct with this BS attack, he wasn't, he was being disingenuous and has a grudge.
  6.  
  7. The age of a study means nada if the study was well done, with sound methodology. And the study wrt NPK and greenhouse grown cannabis was a sound study, conducted by highly respected authors that are cannabis researchers. Thus, we can use data from that study as evidence to effects from NPK on THCA.
  8.  
  9. However, that is not to claim the book is closed wrt NKP and THC, as well as Mg, Ca, etc. As I wrote in that thread, the evidence from that study is useful, but far from a proven fact.
  10.  
  11. To wit, your claim: "All this 'ppm level' data is from 40 years ago. It is comparing different plants from different locations...".
  12.  
  13. ^^^ That's untrue. The greenhouse study was done in a greenhouse, not different plants from different locations. I think you may be confusing the single screenshot I posted (and Chimera incorrectly made dumb ass assumption about; see my response to him) with the studies DizzleKush posted (the sames ones I posted months ago).
  14.  
  15. Please, don't assume a study is not worth reading and has no value just because it was from the 70's or 80's or 90's, etc.
  16.  
  17. ---------------------------------------------
  18.  
  19. Oh yea, a while ago we were chatting and you wrote:
  20.  
  21. "'Genetic engineering', to me, is splicing 'this gene' into 'that organism'; wholly unnatural. Creating a triploid is GMO, to me, it is genetically modifying the organism; but it is not beyond nature."
  22.  
  23. You seem to have the terms a bit mixed up. A GMO is made via GE (Genetic Engineering). One cannot make a GMO without using GE. Thus, if GE is not used, the result is not a GMO.
  24.  
  25. Making tetraploid or triploid chromotype cannabis cultivars is about as far from GE, and thus GMO, as is making an F1 hybrid with two diploid chromotypes. The Genus Cannabis has tetraploid chromotypes in its genetic heritage, as well as triploid chromotypes, since antiquity. Conversion from diploid to tetraploid (and vis'a verse) naturally happens in almost all diploid plant Genus, at one point or another. Re: "autotetraploidy" and "autoploidy".
  26.  
  27. ---------------------------------------------
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment