Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up,
it unlocks many cool features!
- Greg Malivuk
- http://www.pastebin.com/u/gmalivuk - notes from all classes
- ---
- Homework (optional): If you want more feedback on your writing than last week (e.g. corrections for grammar and vocabulary throughout), email me with a self-evaluation of both your responses. What did you do well or better than previous writing? What did you do badly and need to improve? What score do you think each response should get?
- ---
- https://ed.ted.com/lessons/why-haven-t-we-cured-arthritis-kaitlyn-sadtler-and-heather-j-faust
- low-impact exercise
- ---
- Reading Test - ETS 1.5
- Take 60 minutes to answer the questions about all three passages.
- Submit your answers online when you’re done.
- ---
- 18 - fact - A (“Why should we judge cetacenas by their ability to solve human problems?”)
- 22 - negative fact - C (They can answer signed questions, but the text doesn’t mention spoken questions.)
- ---
- BREAK
- ---
- Listening Test - Number your paper from 1 to 34.
- Submit your answers online when you’re finished.
- ---
- Reading
- 29 - paraphrase - B (account for = explain; There’s no implication of “should” in the original sentence, so C and D are wrong. There’s also nothing about protection of land, so A is wrong. A model for something can imply “should”, but a model of something doesn’t.)
- Listening
- 5 - function - C (“So I’m out of luck?” “Well, you would be if you were starting anywhere else but Hooper.” = He would be unlucky if he didn’t start at Hooper, but he will start at Hooper so he’s not unlucky.)
- 23 - main idea - A (The correct interpretation was found thanks to improvements in telescopes, but the lecture wasn’t mainly about telescopes, it was about nebulae.)
- 25 - detail - C (Variable stars were used to figure out the distance to the nebulae, and then we could better understand the size of the universe.)
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
