API tools faq
paste
Advertisement
Lesta

10 Lesta Nediam LNC2016-02-18 2110 +Terran Downvale

Lesta
Feb 18th, 2016
30
0
Never
Add comment
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 12.82 KB | None | 0 0
raw download clone embed print report
  1. Lesta Nediam LNC2016-02-18 2110 +Terran Downvale
  2. https://plus.google.com/u/0/+LestaNediamHQ/posts/6YSxM5BZG4C
  3. https://pastebin.com/XHanAHgi
  4. __
  5.  
  6.  
  7. +Terran Downvale __ The first link does not work though I am not sure what you are pointing out. We are talking about YouTube and YouTube's embedded video player. It is something we are all very familiar with. Anomalies like what we saw with "Peekay" can be expected to occur on external websites but not YouTube itself.
  8.  
  9.  
  10. If the "popping out video player" had happened on any of his other "known good" videos then it could be dismissed as a "peculiarity" of "Peekay's" garbage XP system.
  11.  
  12.  
  13. However - in his own "poor me" video he scrolls on two videos. With one video (the one that is in question) it has the apparent video player anomaly. With the other video (which is not in question) the scrolling works as normal. (Had the situation been reversed then this issue may not have even come about!)
  14.  
  15.  
  16. What we see happen simply does not happen without some kind of intervention. *At no time does scrolling down cause a video to obscure the YouTube header region.* I know this. *You know this.* Everyone knows this. _It does not happen._
  17.  
  18.  
  19. As I say - if this had happened during a "known good" video then all would be okay. *But it just so happens to have happened during a video where he claims to have gotten a strike.* That is magnitudes more serious.
  20.  
  21.  
  22. It is noteworthy that he does not play any of that video (and only scrolls the page). If he had contrived the situation then it makes sense he would not be able to play the video and so all talk of doing so would be "misdirection".
  23.  
  24.  
  25. *What we see in "Peekay's" video is fraud and there is no other conclusion you can arrive at if you are thoughtful and honest.* You don't need to be a "computer expert" or "Flash Player guru" to know that what we see has been manufactured (besides - there are several other ways to satisfactorily prove shenanigans).
  26.  
  27.  
  28. You have never seen this same problem happen with anyone else. You have never seen it happen with any of "Peekay's" other videos. As far as we know this is the only time it has ever happened.
  29.  
  30.  
  31. And it just so happens to have occurred during one specific video and that particular video happens to be his claim about getting a strike. (It was curious that "Peekay" objected with the question: *"Why would I fake a strike against my own video?"* - as though we must provide the correct answer or leave it alone. We have all heard that nonsense question when we talk to people about "fabricated events". "Normal people" often ask: *"Why would anyone fake it?"* - Simply, humans sometimes do strange and stupid things that in hindsight have no good explanation. We cannot always know another person's reasons or motivations. To be asked that question and somehow expected to answer it only makes "Peekay" look more guilty. Of all people "Peekay" should know better about that question.)
  32.  
  33.  
  34. We are led to believe a strike against an innocuous video occurred within an hour of his posting the video. That is a rapid response from the YouTube team! And the only way it could have been given a strike is due to the video's title.
  35.  
  36.  
  37. (I must point out: *There are MORE FLAWS than just the video obscuring YouTube's header section when he scrolled down but that is the weakest link I am confining myself to.*)
  38.  
  39.  
  40. The scroll phenomenon is a detail that is undeniable.
  41.  
  42.  
  43. "Peekay" fabricated his "poor me" video and because that video now gives a legitimate error message *it means he must have an insider at YouTube.*
  44.  
  45.  
  46. That is to say: When I first objected "Peekay" tried to "prove" he really got a strike by showing that he is limited to just 15 minute uploads. But he could have gotten a strike for *something else* and pinned it on the innocuous video.
  47.  
  48.  
  49. *Therefore the way to have proven he really did get a strike would have been to show the error message YouTube gives when you visit the video's link.* _But he didn't do that._
  50.  
  51.  
  52. Maybe he didn't think to do that - _it's now too late_ - we cannot know. What we DO know is that he STILL had access to his video AFTER acknowledging the strike. He showed the video with 333 views. He then acknowledged the strike. And then when he showed the video the view count had increased. The only way to get the new view count is to have refreshed the page. Refreshing the page should have given him the error message that we now see! As I say - he has snookered himself in several different ways.
  53.  
  54.  
  55. (And I must point out: the fact the view count had increased and the fact we are calling into question the video itself - it suggests a "continuity error". It is reasonable to suspect he manufactured the "333" number. That means he did that to appeal to those who are focused on numbers such as yourself. If I am correct then he has sought to MANIPULATE YOU. How can anyone be okay with this?!)
  56.  
  57.  
  58. To get the increased view count - (if he didn't outright fake it) - means he *must* have refreshed the page. But given he had FIRST acknowledged the strike (and thus the video's removal) it should have shown him the ERROR MESSAGE (plus reason!) instead of showing the video with an updated view count! (Since when does a video REMOVED by YouTube remain VIEWABLE by anyone in the world?!)
  59.  
  60.  
  61. *Do you understand that "Peekay" has snookered himself several different ways?*
  62.  
  63.  
  64. It's one thing to call it a "Flash Player anomaly" but when you put all of these other factors together there can be only one conclusion: *FRAUD.*
  65.  
  66.  
  67. Why is this a surprise? He posted outright DISINFORMATION during the alleged "Virginia Shooting" by creating and encouraging a belief that the purported "shooting" was done in two or more takes. He has been SHOWN to be wrong and as far as I know his video remains public and had well over a quarter of a million views.
  68.  
  69.  
  70. His focus on the alleged "Boston Marathon Bombing" is what he is noted for. But as far as I am concerned he is noted for posting LOW RESOLUTION FOOTAGE. He has saturated the market with poor quality footage and poor quality commentary. Any good points he makes are buried ten minutes deep into a video.
  71.  
  72.  
  73. Is it any surprise that he is now spending his time doing interviews with DITRH and Patricia Steere? In his 49 minute interview with them it SOUNDS LIKE he says that he believes the Earth is flat! (Remind me to provide you with a link to the video and the time period to listen to.) I was shocked! Until recently I thought he shut down anyone who brought up the flat Earth topic. But he is tight with "Russianvids" (who I have caught posted disinformation - the "Simpsons" disinformation with "Donald Trump" and more recently disinformation with "Chris Hadfield").
  74.  
  75.  
  76. It is not possible ANY LONGER to sustain a belief that "Peekay" HAS NOT been compromised. If you genuinely believe "Peekay" is honest and wouldn't do such a thing. Then let's just look at this issue in a very simple way:
  77.  
  78.  
  79. There are two possibilities. Which of these two is more likely?
  80.  
  81.  
  82. 1. "Peekay" *mirrored* an innocuous video that exists elsewhere and within an hour got a strike for it and his video removed. The rapid strike, the "video scroll anomaly", the "increased view count", other "HTML rendering oddities" - all of that is somehow "natural".
  83.  
  84.  
  85. *OR*
  86.  
  87.  
  88. 2. "Peekay" - *for reasons that only HE can know* - went along with inventing a story about receiving a rapid strike (within one hour) for an innocuous video. And that the anomalies we can observe: the video scroll anomaly; the increased view count; the "HTML rendering" oddities etc. are NOT natural but are instead evidence of his deceit.
  89.  
  90.  
  91. __
  92.  
  93.  
  94. If you believe "Peekay" is a genuine person then it is natural to feel disbelief. It is natural to invent "plausible explanations" that are limited only by your natural intelligence and imagination.
  95.  
  96.  
  97. *But I strongly suggest that what we see is evidence of fraud.* I strongly suggest that whatever "natural explanations" can be given are EVEN BETTER explained as EVIDENCE of fraud. *An honest person who is posting about an honest strike simply does not have these "oddities". Not even ONE of them!*
  98.  
  99.  
  100. It is not as though I am accusing him privately. *I am accusing him publically.* That is because I am 100% certain of what has happened. I have no doubt. If I had any hesitation or reservation then I would only point this out privately. Although I cannot KNOW what happened - I can figure out enough to know that "Peekay" has LIED about SOMETHING. And an honest person in a genuine situation like that simply does not lie about ANYTHING.
  101.  
  102.  
  103. *Somehow YouTube must be involved.* That is the only way that video can now give the error message. *It must be the case that "Peekay" has an insider.* He may not be aware of that person - I can only speculate. An insider - or somehow working with others - would explain a great many things. As I say - I cannot PROVE anything (it remains a subjective interpretation with the only exception being the "video scroll" anomaly - that appears to be objective and undeniable). *Peekay's video now gives the appropriate error message when you load the page but "Peekay" did not show us that at the time and chose to show a reduced upload duration as the proof.* (The limited upload duration is something that can be faked WHEREAS an actual "error message" from YouTube CANNOT be faked - so it's possible that at the time the error message did not exist.)
  104.  
  105.  
  106. Also - what is interesting - *is that no explanation was given with the message "Peekay" showed.*
  107.  
  108.  
  109. When I got a strike *I was told exactly why* and I was given links to help pages to help me to avoid making the same mistake.
  110.  
  111.  
  112. *How can YouTube remove a video but give no reason?!* How can "Peekay" know what he did wrong and learn from it if no explanation is given?! _Does that make sense to you?!_
  113.  
  114.  
  115. "Peekay" claimed he did not know why his video was removed. When I got my own strike I knew immediately it was because my video had been determined "offensive". Everyone who has had a video removed KNOWS WHY. We don't know WHO caused the strike - but we know WHY it has happened.
  116.  
  117.  
  118. Because "Peekay" did not show the video removal message at the time of it happening there is no way to know WHEN that became the case.
  119.  
  120.  
  121. YES - it appears "Peekay's" video HAS BEEN GENUINELY REMOVED. But the "poor me" video that he posted was *FABRICATED.* It was contrived.
  122.  
  123.  
  124. If "Peekay" lacks the video editing skills to do such a thing then it suggests he has help.
  125.  
  126.  
  127. When I watched his "NASA" videos I got the impression he was narrating a video handed to him. In some of those videos plus especially his "George Bush ISS" video - parts were completely chopped out and he didn't mention at all the "masking glitches". His "George Bush ISS" video also was recorded at extremely low frame rates - probably to hide the masking glitches.
  128.  
  129.  
  130. With other videos that "Peekay" has posted they have felt scripted and "written for him". All of this is anecdotal - I cannot prove any of it with certainty. But it all matches up with this latest drama. *The ONLY thing I can prove is the video scroll anomaly* and so I must confine myself exclusively to that.
  131.  
  132.  
  133. All I can do is point these things out. I cannot make you or anyone else accept the conclusion.
  134.  
  135.  
  136. Out of the hundreds - to thousands - of videos that "Peekay" has screen-recorded and posted do you really think that the "flash player" decided to f_kc up at that precise moment for that ONE video but not ever at any time prior?
  137.  
  138.  
  139. Either the "flash player" f_kced up at that precise moment during an unlikely video (such a rapid strike!) or it was overlaid and was entirely contrived.
  140.  
  141.  
  142. Note: if "Peekay" starts posting videos which reproduce the scrolling problem then it is obviously for damage control. The fact is that PRIOR to this specific incident it did not occur. For him to claim it is natural would require showing videos he has screen-recorded PRIOR to this incident where the video appears over the YouTube header area when scrolling down.
  143.  
  144.  
  145. I have written a lot! I can only repeat the same things so much!
  146.  
  147.  
  148. If you think "Peekay" is innocent then I am curious to know why that is the case *despite everything I have pointed out in this message and in others! How can he possibly be defended or excused?!
  149.  
  150.  
  151. ______
  152.  
  153.  
  154. *This post may be of interest to those following this issue:*
  155.  
  156.  
  157. +MsKickup , +PartizaneProductions , +cabadejo , +Terran Downvale
  158.  
  159.  
  160.  
  161. __________________________________________
  162. Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's posts, comments, videos and discussions:
  163. https://pastebin.com/Bfr5RMSg
  164.  
  165. Here is Lesta Nediam's Google Plus posts (i.e., blog) - this is where Lesta is most active:
  166. https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ
  167.  
  168. Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's video uploads:
  169. https://pastebin.com/WV42jUb1
  170.  
  171. Here is Lesta Nediam's YouTube channel - for videos about the lie system:
  172. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement
Public Pastes
Advertisement
We use cookies for various purposes including analytics. By continuing to use Pastebin, you agree to our use of cookies as described in the Cookies Policy.  OK, I Understand
Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!