10 Lesta Nediam LNC2016-02-14 0425 +nationalparksign

Lesta Nediam LNC2016-02-14 0425 +nationalparksign
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nObGH71j3z4&lc=z12wxrsaconwyv0jt04cjfapmqfczhagenk0k
https://pastebin.com/WmShMFtb
__




+nationalparksign __ [This turned out to be quite long! I had to type it quickly and I have not had a chance to read over it - forgive any typos etc.] Yes - I have seen that "tour" before. I have posted about how the longer "tours" are faked in the past but I could have done a better job of it. The "tour" that people most ask about is the one you have given. And so I will need to address it and I'll do that in the long video that I am working on - so thanks for suggesting it - it's good timing.







The reason you are stumped is because you are watching what looks like a kind of "home movie" *but you are thinking of it as a "real home movie" and not as a potential cinema movie.*







It could have taken hours, days or even weeks to put the "Sunita Williams tour" together. I think you have seen the video where I show the "astronaut" brushing his teeth? In that video there were at least two definite takes. What is interesting is that the gentleman in the background *is wearing a different shirt!* And so a possibly significant period of time could have elapsed.







To properly scrutinise the "tours" you need to *suspend belief* and think of it as a kind of "magic show" that is "intended to be accepted as real". Just as you should never take your eyes away from a magician's hands - if you aren't seeing the full body of an "astronaut" then anything is possible.







Are you familiar with "Derren Brown"? He is a "stage magician" who does a lot of "street magic". His "angle" is "mentalism" and "psychological effects". But the tricks he does are not being played on people - the trick is being played on the audience. Go and watch some YouTube videos where "Derren Brown" does some "pick pocketing". Either he is a highly talented pick--pocket or the "victim" is in on it. Notice how he sets it all up. How he talks about "attention" and how we can focus on only a few things at a time. All of this is to "disarm" you as the audience into believing it is *possible.* Once you believe it is possible it becomes difficult to resist.







Someone may demand that I prove the "victim" is in on it. Someone may say "but at the end of the episode he shows a clip where he got caught". That is all to make you believe it's real. "They only showed us the successful attempts - therefore what we are looking at is real".







__







Unfortunately it takes a certain mind and intellect to be able to examine these issues. *Most people just cannot do it.* They can go only so far.







For those who can go the distance the risk becomes that of going too far and losing their mind and sanity. Though there are ways to prevent that from happening I have unfortunately come across a few people who have flipped out and lost the plot.







There is one such person on my Google Plus who is currently "flipping out" - "Brian Hill". If he is being serious (and wasn't against me from the outset) then he appears to be having a mental breakdown. He is desperate to believe that *something* is real and is lashing out at me and calling me a "professional deceiver".







He is the second person in the span of about 6 months to have done this. As I say - this isn't for everyone and I would not recommend this to people who aren't ready. This isn't for dummies and paranoid people - though these topics certainly attract that demographic.







__.







Keep also in mind that all we are given is footage of what *could be* a magic trick. *Can we be expected to explain it?* No! If I show you footage of a magic trick where an assistant is cut in half and you cannot explain how it is done - are you then required to believe the assistant was really cut in half?! _Of course not._







"NASA" and the "ISS" play directly to our trust and our pre-existing beliefs. *The "Sunita Williams" "ISS tour" is probably the most convincing footage produced.* (As I say - it is certainly the one that I am asked about the most.)







What is interesting is this: if something is real and genuine then ALL footage from it must necessarily be real and genuine. But if something is fake then we should not look at the most convincing footage and say, _"Well I am baffled! it must be real!"_ - *we should instead focus on the least convincing footage!*







If it's real then it's ALL real. *If it's real then we should find no evidence of fakery.* Just because one clip of something fake appears genuine does not mean ALL of the clips of something fake are genuine.







But if something is genuine and not fake then it should ALL seem genuine. Real is real. You shouldn't be feeling any kind of "difference" between the clips. The fact we DO feel that "difference" (that "some ISS footage is more convincing than others") is a signal that we are looking at something artificial though we can't quite put our finger on it.







If you watch a Wimbledon tennis final do you ever find yourself thinking "am I watching real people or a hologram?" You don't. If you watch the last ten Wimbledon tennis finals do ANY of them seem artificial? Of course not!







*And so how strange it is that when it comes to the "ISS" footage there can be such variations.*







It should cause alarm within us to note that when it comes to the "ISS" there does seem to be more convincing footage and less convincing footage. If the "ISS" is real - then ALL of it should seem EQUALLY real. Just as each Wimbledon tennis final seems EQUALLY real. It should not be the case that 2012's Wimbledon final seemed less real than 2010's final!







If the alleged "ISS" is real and manned then its least convincing footage should feel "as real as" its most convincing. Just as 2010's Wimbledon final seems as real as 2012's.







Also - to repeat - we must suspend belief to examine the "ISS" footage. This is not easily done. But one way to think of it is as follows:




If you are watching it with the belief it is real then it will puzzle and stump you. But if you have successfully suspended belief then ask yourself: "if the portion of the clip that stumps me were shown in a movie - would I be necessarily impressed?"







Would you think to yourself: *_"Wow - how could they have done that?! They must have filmed that portion of the movie while aboard the International Space Station! It's the only way to have done it!"_*







Anyway! I'll take another look at that "ISS tour" and I'll address it in the long explanatory video that I am putting together.







Finally - just to mention it quickly (I'm a bit all over the place - typing quickly) - people start out with a belief (which is their "belief bias"). A person believes that the "ISS" is real and manned. *We ALL start out with that belief.* I know I did. But that belief was founded and formed on trust and proof's appearances.







I believed - and you believed - that there was a real and manned "ISS" *BEFORE* any doubt could arise and *BEFORE* either of us saw the "Sunita Williams" "tour".







A belief in the "ISS" didn't come AFTER seeing something convincing. We started out with the belief. You feel "stumped" or perhaps - *amazed* - *because the footage you are watching seems to confirm the pre-existing belief that it is real.*







What is curious is that you don't feel that "stumped" or "awe" when you watch ALL of the other "ISS" footage! But there is no reason why you wouldn't IF it were ALL real!







As I say - the belief about the "ISS" was founded and formed BEFORE we even SAW it! We just accepted it. We accepted it at an early age and for long enough that it is just "with us". And then when we later see footage like the "Sunita Williams" "tour" it seems to confirm or reinforce that pre-existing belief.







It's amazing because it seems EVEN MORE convincing. (And that's the problem - it should ALL look EQUALLY convincing!)







If you expect someone to point out something that PROVES it is fake - you will be disappointed. That isn't ever going to happen. If undeniable proof that the "ISS" is fake were to be shown then it would be proof of a global fraud! *We can have no expectation of ever seeing such a thing.*







The reason is because the lie system simply does not make "movie-making mistakes" (which is what would be required in this instance). If something does contain an actual mistake then it won't be a lie system event or claim. (The "ISS" is most definitely a lie system claim.)







I've written a lot! *I can tell you now that the "Sunita Williams" "tour" contains some very subtle masking glitches.* These are extremely subtle - "micro" glitches. You need some experience to detect them. I have been examining "ISS" footage very closely for a long time and I have gotten good at noticing what needs to be noticed.







Unfortunately I don't expect everyone to be able to notice what I point out. I have not yet decided the best way to resolve this conundrum which is why I have not yet posted any videos on the "micro" glitches.







To accept what I am saying will require you to watch some other footage I have not yet posted which proves the presence of extremely subtle joins. That will all be presented in the long video - prior to going through the "Sunita" footage (that would be the logical sequence).







Anyway! I'll wrap this up.







If you come across any other footage that you feel is convincing be sure to pass it on to me.







Because you gave a YouTube link your comment ended up in spam (I am only seeing it a day later because I happened to check the spam folder - it can sometimes take a week or longer before I peek into the spam folder so this was meant to be!).







If you give the "watch=v?blah" part of the URL then your comment won't get stuck in spam. Simply go to the video and copy the URL then give only the "watch?v=" part of the link.







For example - if you had given the following URL in your comment it would not have ended up in spam:  >>>> watch?v=doN4t5NKW-k <<<< (That is a link to the video you gave me.)






__________________________________________
Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's posts, comments, videos and discussions:
https://pastebin.com/Bfr5RMSg

Here is Lesta Nediam's Google Plus posts (i.e., blog) - this is where Lesta is most active:
https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ

Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's video uploads:
https://pastebin.com/WV42jUb1

Here is Lesta Nediam's YouTube channel - for videos about the lie system:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w