22 Lesta Nediam LNC2016-10-28 0925 +Terran Downvale

Lesta Nediam LNC2016-10-28 0925 +Terran Downvale
https://plus.google.com/112413489582307671009/posts/7kJUFeqm3Go
https://pastebin.com/WkQP5NWY
__

There is no need to apologise and I am genuinely trying to help you. *The numbers will always serve as a way for you to become convinced of something you desire or require to be true*.

That is what the numbers are used for. *Noticing the "nutty numbers" is an "OCD" that has been created in you by dishonest people and other people who also suffer from the same "OCD"*. That is what is going on.

It is well-known that "conspiracy theorists" have a tendency to focus on "wild connections" and "numbers" and so it must be assumed that the lie system has a "policy" to throw about a whole lot of numbers to send "number theorists" into a frenzy.

What better way to f_kc with their head and misdirect them? What better way to mask what's going on? *Isn't that what "Penn and Teller" would recommend doing*?

You have focused on *some* of the numbers from the article *but not all of them*. If numbers had a genuine and objective meaning (and were a part of valid connections that can be made) then how can it be that the numbers you didn't focus on don't also have relevance? _They must!_

*Either all of the numbers in an article have meaning or you cannot be certain any of them do - which means that of those numbers you do latch onto you are being arbitrary*.

This is contrary to true things for true reasons.

This is especially dangerous because you are at risk of accepting that something (without genuine meaning) is true and can imagine it possible (to have genuine meaning when it doesn't). *Once this happens you become powerless to resist believing that the numbers you have focused on have genuine meaning (when in reality that need not be the case)*.

The reason you have overlooked the other numbers is because you did not find a way for them to be meaningful. You simply found meaning in those numbers which *did* stand out for you.

There were *a lot of numbers* mentioned in the article. *Some of them were bound to be perceived as meaningful*!

This is a serious problem and it will get in the way of genuine connections you *are* able to make. There *are* genuine patterns and there *are* genuine connections and there *are* genuine event priming motifs to recognise etc. *You have always had a talent for uncovering those things but these "nutty numbers" are not helpful in achieving that outcome*.

The nutty numbers are an *outright misdirection*. They serve to throw good, honest and intelligent people *off the scent*. It is fool's gold *and nothing more*.

_This is very worrying_.

Notice how charlatans like "Russianvids" constantly yammer on and on about the nutty numbers. By doing this he repeats meaning into his audience's reality *when there is no necessary meaning*.

Recall how people like "Dave Johnson" would constantly go on and on about "9/11 codes" and so forth. This all adds up and takes a toll on those who are paying attention.

Every person in the "conspiracy community" has been routinely exposed to the idea of "numbers having meaning" just as much as we have all been exposed to the idea of the "Earth being flat".

If ever there were a "psy-op" going on right now then "nutty numbers" would be it. Just like the "flat Earth" the "nutty numbers" are ruining good people. They are taking their time and attention *away* from what matters.

And that - in part - is what p!sses me off.

The people who promote nutty numbers are wittingly or unwittingly leading good people - people who are able to perceive genuine connections - *astray*.

This is deeply troubling to me for selfish reasons - *I need you on the right path*!

Nutty numbers have absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with seeking true things for true reasons. *The nutty numbers are a thinking flaw and nothing more*.

It must be recognised for what it is and shunned before it debilitates you (I don't give a f_kc about anyone else - let them go insane with the nutty numbers).


__


You added new data to the article when you wrote _"and his very first credit 25 = 7 years ago"_. I.e., you have included a number "7" (via "25 = 7") which was not mentioned in the article because you are sensitive to it (i.e., looking for it) *while overlooking the other numbers which were mentioned but didn't trigger adequate meaning*.

*You simply found a way to confirm your pre-existing belief bias*. You found what you were looking for - _even if it meant adding something new to what was there_.

__

The first couple of numbers are "variables" and will change depending on when and where you view the article:


10/27/2016 at 7:21am
Updated 4 hours ago
610 shares on facebook/etc.
10 comments to the article

__


The following numbers were specifically mentioned in the article *but which you did not incorporate into your post* (how can it be they were they not relevant and meaningful?!).

At the start in brackets of each line I have given the relevant "nutty number" followed by how it was calculated with a portion of the sentence it came from:


(5) 1994 = 23 = 5 = _"on the set of their 1994 film"_
(7) 2014 = 7 = _"on the 2014 French TV series"_
(4) 1993 = 22 = 4 = _"on the set of 'The Crow' in 1993"_
(4, 4) 31 = 4; 1993 = 22 = 4 = _"on March 31, 1993"_
(1) 28 = 10 = 1 = _"he was 28"_
(5) 1994 = 23 = 5 = _"was released in May of 1994"_
(7) 2005 = 7 = _"he said in a 2005 interview"_
(8) 80 = 8 = _"who has almost 80 film"_
(6) 1995 = 24 = 6 = _"David Fincher's 1995 thriller"_
(8) 1997 = 26 = 8 = _"again in 1997"_
(8) 1997 = 26 = 8 = _"Lost Highway (1997)"_
(6) 2004 = 6 = _"Catwoman (2004)"_
(5) 2012 = 5 = _"Amazing Spider-Man (2012)"_
(7) 2014 = 7 = _"Amazing Spider-Man 2 (2014)"_


*The above nutty number frequency*:

Nutty number "1" occurred 1 time.
Nutty number "4" occurred 3 times.
Nutty number "5" occurred 3 times.
Nutty number "6" occurred 2 times.
Nutty number "7" occurred 3 times.
Nutty number "8" occurred 3 times.

__


*The nutty numbers are a misdirection*. It is precisely what we can expect from the lie system. *Just look at all the people who are focusing on them and obsessing over them*. More and more so this is becoming the case.

Just as more and more people talk about the "Earth being flat" the idea becomes "more accepted". The same thing is happening with the "nutty numbers". You are seeing more and more people leaving comments pointing out "nutty numbers THEREFORE conspiracy".

The nutty numbers - at best - are a way for you to confirm to yourself "something isn't right" but they are *proof of nothing*.

If their posts and comments read like insanity to you then what makes you think your posts are any different? Each person feels they are making a "solid connection" but it is in their mind only.

Do you really think any of these people have cracked "the code"? Or are they more simply finding connections and patterns *in hindsight because that is how our mind works best*?

Our mind is very good and comfortable at finding connections in reverse. *Something is only relevant and meaningful if it can help us to make future predictions about events and claims*. If it doesn't also work "forwards" then it is *nothing* but *random* noise.


>>> *The nutty numbers do not give us any predictive power. The nutty numbers can be used in hindsight only*. <<<


Notice how "Russianvids" will use his "nutty numbers" to add things up to arrive at an answer he wants to repeat to his audience. He will focus on a word and give its Gematria (whichever version does the trick!) if it gives him a "33" or a "666" etc. *But he disregards all of the words from an article that don't*.

Why is that? At best it is because he is *belief-biased* and at worst it is because he is *outright dishonest*.

Whether you want to accept it or not *you are doing a similar thing when you focus on some numbers to the exclusion of others* (because they don't fit the patterns or connections or meanings you want/require them to have).

This is a huge problem. This is a significant hurdle/obstacle *and I realise it won't be easy or quick to get over* - IF AT ALL - but an effort *must be made* to overcome it.


>> No one else is speaking up about this and so I am. <<


There are valid connections and of all people I know that *you alone are capable of making them*. I trust your connections before that of anyone else.

>>>>> This "OCD" with nutty numbers is destroying your natural talent. *Your very  gift for accurately interpreting the "great big dream"*. <<<<

This is not an accident - I would suggest this guiding of you (and others) toward the nutty numbers has been by design. *What better way to f_kc with your head than to sprinkle numbers into an article which you and others can be expected to latch onto and invent meaning/relevance for*?

>> The lie system has done a real number on us all (so to speak) and it is doing it all over again with this. <<

__

I am writing these words to you because I recognise a problem that no one else is prepared to go near. *I am prepared to take on the inevitable criticism and attacks from those who are protective of their nutty numbers if it means I can lead you back to the path of seeking true things for true reasons*.


>>>>>> *I owe that much to you for sticking by me as you have over the past two years*. <<<<<<


__


P.S. It is not that I don't want to see you writing any nutty numbers - *it is that I want you to understand what is actually going on when are being pointed out and cited*. I need *you* to figure out *for yourself* that they are a *complete truther trap* and a *complete lie system misdirection*. Right now I understand you don't feel that way and it does take time to recover from *any* kind of "OCD".

If you need to turn on me - get angry with me - hate on me - or anything like that to get you through this process - go for it. I'll still be here when you're on the other side of it and I won't hold anything against you. (Should it come to that.)

P.P.S. I need to paste this to my Google Plus because what I have written here is lengthy and relevant to everyone else who has become *fascinated* by the "nutty numbers".


______________________________________________________________
My name is Lesta Nediam and I am cracking reality like a nut.

Lesta Nediam's YouTube Channel:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w

Lesta Nediam's Google Plus:
https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ

Lesta Nediam's Twitter:
https://twitter.com/LestaNediam

Lesta Nediam's Public Comments:
https://pastebin.com/u/Lesta

What does not exist - exists to exist.
What exists - exists to always exist.
As it is written - so it is done.