Advertisement
Guest User

Untitled

a guest
Apr 30th, 2017
310
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 30.63 KB | None | 0 0
  1. <Plailect> gonna post something here before it goes public
  2. <Plailect> https://gist.github.com/Plailect/3cac8fe39bcae46ab0a44a265047a4dd
  3. <s_99> As long as you don't inted to post that on the sub.
  4. <s_99> *intend
  5. <Plailect> why not?
  6. <Plailect> it's pretty important...
  7. <Plailect> the cruel thing was w/e since he already got his due
  8. <s_99> See:
  9. <Plailect> but this guy cannot be allowed in any part of the community
  10. <s_99> This is a hacking scene
  11. <s_99> Not a police station
  12. <Plailect> uh
  13. <Plailect> what
  14. <Plailect> if people should avoid other members of the scene, it's related
  15. <s_99> What I'm saying is: Report him to the authorities
  16. <Plailect> did you read it?
  17. <Plailect> "He has since been banned from the place where this situation occurred, and all information has been turned over to the relevant authorities."
  18. <s_99> Yeah.
  19. <s_99> So.
  20. <s_99> What is posting this gonna help?
  21. <Plailect> people will stop working with him
  22. <Plailect> he will be outcast from the community (which is full of minors)
  23. <Plailect> this does not get swept under the rug
  24. * s_99 sighs
  25. <s_99> This is the job of the justice system.
  26. <s_99> Not mine, not yours.
  27. <Plailect> what are you talking about
  28. <Plailect> are we to just let him run around in a community *full of minors* and *hope* the police do something based on nothing more than an online handle?
  29. <Plailect> this has the personal support of #Cakey and ReSwitched staff
  30. <Plailect> AuroraWright, TuxSH, SciresM, stuckpixel (dark-samus), d0k3, Daeken, Normmatt, etc etc
  31. <LOCAP> Posting this can have negative impact, but I see why you want to do it.
  32. <Plailect> on who? how?
  33. <LOCAP> If this were to be publicized, it could put a bad light on the community as a whole, and it could be seen as witch hunting without evidence. That evidence shouldn't be posted publicly unless relevant authorities give it the "OK," as it could affect an investigation.
  34. <Plailect> this is not a witch hunt
  35. <LOCAP> Not saying it is, but it could be perceived as one.
  36. <Plailect> the investigation is not of note
  37. <Plailect> the only protection I am interested in is that of the minor involved
  38. <s_99> the investigation is literally the only thing that matters.
  39. <Plailect> I mean it does not affect posting this
  40. <Plailect> this is separate
  41. <s_99> ><Plailect> the only protection I am interested in is that of the minor involved
  42. <LOCAP> This isn't the type of thing any law enforcement agency messes around with. There will absolutely be an investigation and the minor is immediately going to be protected. I'm not worried about the minor, as you've already done what needed to be done in order to protect them.
  43. <s_99> I'm not sure what good the post would do to help that single person , either.
  44. <LOCAP> If you post this, the likelihood of false evidence/testimonies coming forward from salty trolls is pretty big, and it would impede an investigation and a verdict.
  45. <Plailect> "the only protection I am interested in is that of [the personal information of] the minor involved
  46. <Plailect> "
  47. <Plailect> the post is for the community
  48. <Plailect> there are tens of thousands of minors in this community, and he is in a position of authority
  49. <Plailect> understand?
  50. <LOCAP> Yes, but by posting this, you're making a situation public. If this goes public, he could easily retaliate by posting that personal information online.
  51. <Plailect> what personal information are you talking about?
  52. <Plailect> the person he's in a relationship with? wtf would that do?
  53. <LOCAP> "the only protection I am interested in is that of [the personal information of] the minor involved"
  54. <Plailect> ammend the statement to include the thousands of other minors that look up to him
  55. <LOCAP> Again, this isn't something that law enforcement will just brush aside. His actions online will be monitored
  56. <Plailect> by not making this public, you enable him to use his position to manipulate others
  57. <Plailect> your reasoning that "law enforcement will monitor him" is of little concern to me if that doesn't *prevent* him from taking advantage of kids
  58. <Plailect> this is the single most inane argument I've ever had
  59. <LOCAP> Let me put it this way
  60. <Plailect> you cannot sit idly by while a child molester uses his position to take advantage of children
  61. <LOCAP> I know someone who actually was involved in something EXACTLY like this
  62. <Plailect> under the pretense that "someone else will handle it"
  63. <LOCAP> The second he went to meet with the child, he was arrested
  64. <LOCAP> Never even made contact
  65. <LOCAP> Again, I am *not worried*
  66. <LOCAP> This isn't under the pretense that "someone else will handle it"
  67. <LOCAP> It's under the knowledge that someone else is already handling it.
  68. <Plailect> you do not know that
  69. <LOCAP> I know you're worried about this, but you've done your part already. Let the police do theirs, please.
  70. <Plailect> No.
  71. <Plailect> I don't care if you don't want to be involved. You took up a position of authority in this community. You are now involved. Protect the damn community.
  72. <Plailect> "the police might arrest him if he goes in person" doesn't matter if he gets kids to send him pictures by abusing his authority
  73. <Plailect> all because you let it stay secret
  74. <LOCAP> Let me think this over. I do see both sides, but this could do more harm than good. Right now, I'm saying no, but I want Clozure and s_99 to make the final decision on this. They're in charge here, not me.
  75. <Plailect> this is being done today
  76. <Plailect> because we have waited long enough
  77. <Plailect> I can delay a short time
  78. <Plailect> but it'll go everywhere soon
  79. <Plailect> TuxSH will give his input on this in a sec
  80. <Plailect> AW is afk
  81. <NerdsMcGee> How long ago was all of this discovered?
  82. <Plailect> 3 weeks
  83. <Plailect> We waited two weeks since our last request for more information from the authorities and decided it was time to go public
  84. <NerdsMcGee> I understand LOCAP not wanting to start a witch hunt, but I've also been blindsided by something in the same vein.
  85. <Plailect> could you please invite AuroraWright and TuxSH to this channel for this discussion?
  86. <NerdsMcGee> http://www.thestar.co.uk/whats-on/out-and-about/paedophile-sexually-assaulted-boy-at-swimming-baths-1-253334 <- That was someone I was working around during the days of OSBetaArchive / WinBeta and I had NO idea.
  87. <NerdsMcGee> Yeah, hang on.
  88. <NerdsMcGee> Plailect: TuxSH is here. lol
  89. <AuroraWright> hi
  90. <TuxSH> hi
  91. <Plailect> okay
  92. <Plailect> this is the most responsible way this situation can be handled
  93. <Plailect> we cannot wait around for a *possible* police response
  94. <AuroraWright> well we should take into account that Daz showed no sign of remorse at all
  95. <AuroraWright> he just went salty
  96. <AuroraWright> blocked me, is playing detective to find anyone involved
  97. <TuxSH> didn't block me on Skype
  98. <NerdsMcGee> My personal feelings is making a statement without getting into specifics, such as name.
  99. <TuxSH> is connected and idle during the usual hours
  100. <AuroraWright> the point is protecting people from him
  101. <TuxSH> <NerdsMcGee> My personal feelings is making a statement without getting into specifics, such as name. >> it's a nickname, not a real name
  102. <AuroraWright> so hisn ame needs to be out
  103. <AuroraWright> *nickname
  104. <AuroraWright> TuxSH, he probably doesn't suspect you yet
  105. <NerdsMcGee> I'm all for protecting those that aren't able to protect themselves, but I'm sure the subreddit will become obliterated once something that inflammatory is posted.
  106. <NerdsMcGee> Not an excuse by far, just something to be prepared for
  107. <Plailect> everyone here signed up for that responsibility
  108. <TuxSH> AuroraWright: really? That'd be surprsing that for him not to do AW knows <=> TuxSH knows
  109. <NerdsMcGee> Plailect: I'm on your side here. Just breathe. I know it's unsettling.
  110. <AuroraWright> well idk
  111. <NerdsMcGee> Anyone else care to chime in? Clozure dubyadud f916253 Gelex Miah_Molkot s_99
  112. <s_99> I for my part am still fully against posting it on the sub.
  113. <Miah_Molkot> We have a duty to protect minors in this community. keep in mind I'm just an IRC halfop tho not a mod
  114. <NerdsMcGee> I'm assuming it's going on GBATemp and whatnot regardless?
  115. <f916253> Hold on lemme read and catch up
  116. <s_99> It can be on Gbatemp for all I care
  117. <TuxSH> don't expect anything from GBATemp
  118. <Plailect> s_99: your reasoning for this so far seems unsound
  119. <AuroraWright> gbatemp might just delete it like they did with Cruel
  120. <Plailect> even if the police do "monitor" him in the future, he is still a danger to members of *your* community
  121. <s_99> Then talk to them?
  122. <AuroraWright> why are you opposed to it though?
  123. <AuroraWright> I don't think flame would last long, a few days at worst
  124. <NerdsMcGee> Plailect: You could throw something on the guide as a middle ground?
  125. <s_99> But there would be. And I don't want the sub to be any further involved in any flamewars than must be.
  126. <Plailect> that is not a middle ground
  127. <Plailect> that is a contingency
  128. <Plailect> s_99: this is not some inane drama
  129. <AuroraWright> would you able to have it on your conscience if something happened because of your decision?
  130. <TuxSH> there's no middle ground in this issue
  131. <TuxSH> as opposed to the dev-related drama
  132. <s_99> AuroraWright: Would I be making that decision if I wasn't? Don't get me wrong, I'm fully for him being investigated by the Police. But this is not the right procedure.
  133. <Plailect> What the fuck?
  134. <Plailect> Of course this is the correct procedure.
  135. <Plailect> He is a known pedophile. He did not deny allegations against him. This community is full of minors.
  136. <Plailect> there is absolutely no sane way to justify not making this known to said minors
  137. <s_99> Then let me get some things straight here.
  138. <s_99> 1.) Is there even any known sexual contact between him and any other than the minor he is in a relationship with?
  139. <AuroraWright> he had been flirting with a 15 year old on skype
  140. <AuroraWright> no sexual contact that I know of though
  141. <Plailect> it does not matter that he has or has not
  142. <TuxSH> no public*
  143. <Plailect> you don't say "Yeah but has this pedophile molested anyone else?" before taking action
  144. <Plailect> this is a one strike and you're out situation
  145. <TuxSH> their discussions in #CTRDev have clearly been of sexual nature
  146. <TuxSH> explicitly
  147. <TuxSH> there's no denying that
  148. <AuroraWright> yeah
  149. <Plailect> You're actively saying that you do not want the community to know
  150. <s_99> Let me get something straight here:
  151. <Plailect> You're putting the community at risk just to avoid the fallout of dealing with it
  152. <s_99> That minor you speak of is 15? Yeah?
  153. <AuroraWright> was 14
  154. <AuroraWright> when they had those conversations
  155. <Plailect> This is in the post. 14 when it started.
  156. <AuroraWright> and when it started
  157. <TuxSH> which was illegal in France when it started, and still very illegal in the UK
  158. <s_99> Not illegal here in Germany, mind you.
  159. <NerdsMcGee> Wait, really?
  160. <s_99> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_consent_in_Europe#Germany
  161. <NerdsMcGee> Wow. I didn't know that.
  162. <Plailect> This is irrelevant
  163. <Plailect> neither party lives in Germany
  164. <s_99> Also: You throw the word of "Pedophilia" around a lot.
  165. <Plailect> the relationship has clear markers of sexual grooming and predatory influences
  166. <TuxSH> it's minor abuse, if you prefer
  167. <Plailect> I am not about to debate the morality of this with you
  168. <f916253> Additionally, the services used for communication are hosted in the US and any content going through those platforms is therefore scrutinized under US laws
  169. <AuroraWright> he isolated from his friends since it started
  170. <AuroraWright> he had a personality change
  171. <Plailect> this conversation is off topic
  172. <Plailect> we are not about to justify the reporting of a predator
  173. <Plailect> this does not have to be done
  174. <s_99> No, the reporting is fine.
  175. <s_99> All good there. Would be glad if he got put into jail too,
  176. <Plailect> if you agree with that, then how can you sit here and defend the legality of it?
  177. <Plailect> it is ridiculous that you would go on this side tangent
  178. <s_99> I wanted to get a better view of the situation?
  179. <Plailect> this situation is one between a person clearly in a position of authority exploiting a younger person
  180. <Plailect> read your own cited article
  181. <Plailect> " it is illegal to engage in sexual activity with a person under 18 "by taking advantage of an exploitative situation""
  182. <s_99> Yep yep
  183. <Plailect> so what is your objection?
  184. <s_99> I do not feel it belongs on the subreddit. Never has, never will.
  185. <Plailect> Which rule does this break?
  186. <s_99> Primarily I do not believe it qualifies as actually being related content. A case could be made for the reddiquette but eh.
  187. <Plailect> There is no case for reddiquette
  188. <Plailect> it is certainly related
  189. <Plailect> the guy is a *major* 3DS developer
  190. <TuxSH> there is no personal info that isn't public either
  191. <TuxSH> *already
  192. <s_99> Well, wait on Clozure to say yes then-
  193. <Plailect> okay
  194. <s_99> I just do not see myself agreeing to it. Especially while keeping in mind that, as LOCAP pointed out, it could actually impede Police investigations.
  195. <s_99> However, should there in the future be any way that we can help out with the investigation, I will gladly do so.
  196. <Plailect> Exposing a threat to the minors in the community is the way you can help.
  197. <s_99> I don't think so, sorry.
  198. <Plailect> If you force me to post this elsewhere, I will be forced to include a reason it was not posted to a more appropriate avenue such as /r/3dshacks
  199. * s_99 sighs
  200. <NerdsMcGee> Obviously this is a highly charged and polarizing situation. I ask this, Plailect: Why do you feel the subreddit is the most appropriate avenue?
  201. <Plailect> It is a general outlet for community related information read by many of these minors.
  202. <NerdsMcGee> Where else are you planning on putting that?
  203. <Plailect> depends on you
  204. <NerdsMcGee> From what you were saying, it wouldn't have only been one place?
  205. <Plailect> reddit and temp are intended
  206. <TuxSH> temps is, well... temp
  207. <Plailect> I'd prefer not to resort to putting it on the guide.
  208. <Plailect> it would not be the appropriate location
  209. <Plailect> the reddit is general, the guide has one specific purpose
  210. <s_99> My only suggestion: We do a general info post. I see literally no need for the first two paragraphs to be posted.
  211. <TuxSH> incomplete information is worth nothing
  212. <s_99> ?
  213. <Plailect> the second paragraph contains *all* the information about what happened
  214. <Plailect> aka the entire purpose of the post
  215. <TuxSH> it's all or nothing s_99
  216. <s_99> Yeah, none of what happened is relevant.
  217. <s_99> You wanna protect minors: Do that
  218. <Plailect> what/
  219. <Plailect> ?
  220. <f916253> saying something like "daz is bad stay away" without any additional information isn't going to do any good
  221. <Plailect> are you trying to prevent a witch hunt or cause one?
  222. <TuxSH> s_99, are you sure of yourself?
  223. <Plailect> because saying something vauge like that with no details will just cause one
  224. <TuxSH> that'd hurt the subreddit reputation and yours quite a lot, you know
  225. <TuxSH> I have good faith that you don't want this to happen
  226. <LOCAP> If we do a post, I recommend a few things.
  227. <LOCAP> 1. Either disable comments entirely or scrutinize every single one
  228. <LOCAP> 2. Disallow any discussion of the topic outside of the dedicated thread. Create automod filters to enforce that. We don't need drama sparking up randomly.
  229. <LOCAP> 3. Post with as much information as possible to make it clear this isn't a witch hunt, and simply a warning.
  230. <LOCAP> 4. Don't sticky the post. Let the warning go out, then minimize fallout.
  231. <LOCAP> I also suggest removing the part about Cruel. It's irrelevant, he's already been dealt with.
  232. <NerdsMcGee> ^ I agree
  233. <s_99> TuxSH: I have not a single drop of reputation left to lose, and you should know that.
  234. <s_99> What LOCAP said, though
  235. <Plailect> disabling comments stifles discussion
  236. <TuxSH> s_99: the subreddit does, though
  237. <Plailect> the cruel part shows that this is an ongoing issue
  238. <s_99> Is there any need for discussion on this matter?
  239. <TuxSH> scrutinize every comment then: let people ask legitimate question but not shitpost
  240. <LOCAP> ^
  241. <Plailect> ^
  242. <f916253> yeah
  243. <LOCAP> I want to avoid turning this into a massive shitshow of drama and memes. I feel that there are valid questions that could be asked. This is simply going to require a lot of attention.
  244. <Plailect> so
  245. <Plailect> 1. Scrutinize comments
  246. <Plailect> 2. Disallow any discussion of the topic outside of the dedicated thread
  247. <Plailect> 3. Sticky is not necessary
  248. <Plailect> are we in agreement?
  249. <f916253> Sounds fine to me
  250. <LOCAP> Ideally we can have automod filter comments on just this post, trying to look into doing that
  251. <TuxSH> automod is meh
  252. <s_99> Automod won't work in that case.
  253. <TuxSH> a Dazzozo filter would lead to too many false positives
  254. <s_99> There's no "all" filter for a single thread either. One of you needs to watch this thread 24/7.
  255. <TuxSH> you could just prevent dupe threads to be created
  256. <s_99> Oh, that much is easily done.
  257. <s_99> Speaking of comments though
  258. <TuxSH> and prevent too lengthy discussions about the drama to happen / stop them and redirect it to the controlled topic
  259. <s_99> There is no reason for them to pop up anywhere besides in the intended thread.
  260. <s_99> And new threads don't just happen as each one needs to be manually mod approved.
  261. <TuxSH> the only reason I can think of: someone mentionning the work of Daz and one who replies by referring about the drama
  262. <Plailect> SALT is not discussed too often
  263. <Plailect> probably won't be an issue
  264. <LOCAP> Already did it on a test sub, all I need is the post title s_99
  265. <s_99> neato
  266. <s_99> Now. We all clear?
  267. <Plailect> I'll post when you're ready
  268. <NerdsMcGee> I'll keep an eye out today, since I'm at work
  269. <s_99> AuroraWright, TuxSH: You can probably leave now.
  270. <AuroraWright> ok
  271. <TuxSH> fine
  272. <s_99> Plailect, the post title please so LOCAP can handle it
  273. <Plailect> "[PSA] Recent Community Events"
  274. <LOCAP> Plailect: remove the brackets around PSA, automod doesn't like them
  275. <LOCAP> Other than that, post it exactly as is and it's ready
  276. <Plailect> so
  277. <Plailect> PSA: Recent Community Events
  278. <LOCAP> No colon either
  279. <Plailect> that's going to look weird
  280. <Plailect> a dash?
  281. <Plailect> something?
  282. <LOCAP> Do PSA - Recent Community Events
  283. <Plailect> k
  284. <f916253> One of us should probably make a comment statement on it that it has been approved and thus should not be reported, (That the "personal information" clauses of reddiquette don't apply to public figures etc)
  285. <Plailect> yeah
  286. <s_99> I just told LOCAP to go ahead and do it but whatever you feel like
  287. <f916253> locap can do it
  288. <LOCAP> Working on it now
  289. <s_99> https://i.imgur.com/gMJnBVL.png
  290. <s_99> fun times
  291. <s_99> There will probably be like 20 people on the sub even knowing who dazzozo is
  292. <LOCAP> Please note: Due to the sensitivity of this topic, all comments on this thread will be filtered by moderators. This needs to be taken seriously and handled properly. We are also disallowing any and all discussion of this topic outside of this thread.
  293. <LOCAP> That being said, we will allow constructive discussion here. Do keep in mind proper reddiquette as well as the aforementioned rules.
  294. <LOCAP> How's that
  295. <s_99> Go ahead
  296. <LOCAP> https://puu.sh/vtVfA/6d52e5c43f.png
  297. <LOCAP> Not sure if we want to allow this one or not, it's not terrible, but not contributing
  298. <s_99> Do not want
  299. <s_99> Plailect: Any takers? https://www.reddit.com/r/3dshacks/comments/674ik7/psa_recent_community_events/dgnm95o/
  300. <Plailect> I got it
  301. <Plailect> https://www.reddit.com/r/3dshacks/comments/674ik7/psa_recent_community_events/dgnn3ul/
  302. <Plailect> delete.
  303. <Plailect> LOCAP: f916253
  304. <NerdsMcGee> Done
  305. <Plailect> thanks
  306. <LOCAP> Yeah we don't want to expose the victim's name
  307. <Plailect> https://www.reddit.com/r/3dshacks/comments/674ik7/psa_recent_community_events/dgnln43/
  308. <Plailect> this entire chain can probably be removed
  309. <Plailect> it's pretty hostile for no reason
  310. <Plailect> actually everything with this guy
  311. <Plailect> https://www.reddit.com/r/3dshacks/comments/674ik7/psa_recent_community_events/dgnnfjx/
  312. <Plailect> this shit too
  313. <NerdsMcGee> If that's how you feel, I can pull that thread?
  314. <Plailect> that first comment thread and the guys reply to pbandj
  315. <Plailect> whole chain can be gone I mean
  316. <Plailect> my replies, his, etc
  317. <Plailect> NerdsMcGee: you didn't nuke the whole thread
  318. <NerdsMcGee> Sorry, actual work happened.
  319. <Plailect> https://www.reddit.com/r/3dshacks/comments/674ik7/psa_recent_community_events/dgnooee/ too
  320. <NerdsMcGee> done
  321. <s_99> 1: Not 3DS hacking
  322. <s_99> You tell me users, you tell me
  323. <s_99> https://www.reddit.com/r/3dshacks/comments/674ik7/psa_recent_community_events/dgnpkd2/
  324. <Plailect> holy shit wtf
  325. <s_99> That was totally gonna happen so.
  326. <Plailect> he's been completely off the grid for weeks
  327. <Plailect> pretty unexpected
  328. <s_99> Totally expected, I'd say.
  329. <NerdsMcGee> Welp
  330. <Plailect> tbh
  331. <Plailect> that should probably be removed
  332. <Plailect> he's the victim even if he doesn't think so
  333. <s_99> That will not be removed.
  334. <s_99> f916253: You hear me?
  335. <Plailect> okay'
  336. <Plailect> https://www.reddit.com/r/3dshacks/comments/674ik7/psa_recent_community_events/dgnqpnd/
  337. <Plailect> he's claiming exageration
  338. <Plailect> but this is just damage control
  339. <Plailect> everything stated is factual
  340. <Plailect> in my post
  341. <f916253> s_99: alright; I think it would be better off to prevent their involvement, though
  342. <Clozure> >300 lines here in few hours
  343. <Clozure> s_99: what's up. i was afk
  344. <f916253> https://www.reddit.com/r/3dshacks/comments/674ik7/psa_recent_community_events/
  345. <f916253> this
  346. <Clozure> thanks
  347. <LOCAP> Keep an eye on modqueue, any comment made in that post is filtered out for approval
  348. <Plailect> https://www.reddit.com/r/3dshacks/comments/674ik7/psa_recent_community_events/dgnpkd2/
  349. <Plailect> He undermines the intent to protect the community by lying and saying everything is fine and that it wasn't a sexual relationship (it was)
  350. <f916253> he's speaking as a victim would
  351. <f916253> not surprising
  352. <Plailect> that should be removed
  353. <Plailect> s_99: keeping that only hurts him.
  354. <s_99> Know what also hurts him? The entire post.
  355. <Plailect> how?
  356. <Plailect> the post did not mention him.
  357. <s_99> Do you not see how he is feeling about that though? You are not doing him any good. You know, there's normally fucking professionals who take care of this shit.
  358. <s_99> Not my problem, though.
  359. <s_99> Either way, if your post stays up. His does too.
  360. <Plailect> I am trying to protect a victim of sexual abuse
  361. <Plailect> nothing I did ever exposed him
  362. <Plailect> what he is doing right now does though
  363. <Plailect> your argument that both stay up is ridiculous
  364. <Plailect> Even if he takes offense to his "partner" being targeted, the community still has to be protected
  365. <s_99> So. Let him take offense?
  366. <s_99> As long as he doesn't want to be protected I see no reason to handle this different from normal scene drama? Once again, neither you nor me are the police.
  367. <Plailect> So just let the victim fuck themselves over because they don't know better?
  368. <Plailect> what a great way to protect the community
  369. <Plailect> half of them are idiot kids, but that doesn't mean we should allow them to expose themselves publicly to sexual abuse because they "don't want to be protected"
  370. <s_99> Thats not my job.
  371. <s_99> Literally.
  372. <s_99> There's a great deal of institiutions whose job this is but you wanted to not let them do their job but do your own instead.
  373. <s_99> So maybe you should have sorted things with the victim before making a public post, just maybe.
  374. <Plailect> if you see someone doing something unethical and illegal you have an obligation to report it
  375. <Plailect> *especially* since you are entrusted to moderate the community
  376. <LOCAP> Anyway, if we remove that comment, we'd be deleting a confession from the victim. What a way to help the investigation.
  377. <Plailect> mmmmm
  378. <s_99> <Plailect> if you see someone doing something unethical and illegal you have an obligation to report it
  379. <s_99> TO THE FUCKING AUTHORITIES
  380. <s_99> NOT TO ME
  381. <NerdsMcGee> Enough. Both of you.
  382. <NerdsMcGee> Getting hostile at each other doesn't help anyone.
  383. <LOCAP> ^
  384. <Plailect> I'm not shouting
  385. <Plailect> let's quote sciresm here
  386. <Plailect> 6:28 PM <SciresM> Yes, and step 1 after "report the incident" is "prevent the incident from happening again"
  387. <s_99> Anyways, what LOCAP said.
  388. <LOCAP> The post was made on the condition that we're filtering out memes, shitposts, and anything not constructive. That comment doesn't qualify as any of the above, so it stays. At this point, Plailect, you've made your post. We're handling the comments. If you don't like it, you can delete your post. Other than that, I ask that you let us do our job of containing
  389. <LOCAP> the drama since you insisted that we play police.
  390. <Plailect> Okay.
  391. <Plailect> could we remove https://www.reddit.com/r/3dshacks/comments/674ik7/psa_recent_community_events/dgntp02/
  392. <Plailect> obvious troll
  393. <s_99> sure
  394. <LOCAP> yeah my bad, misclicked
  395. <LOCAP> Locking the post. Number 5 on /r/subredditdrama, not interested in a brigade.
  396. <dubyadud> Jess christ what the fuck is going on
  397. <LOCAP> Have fun reading the novel that is IRC :^0
  398. <f916253> lol
  399. <dubyadud> http://i.imgur.com/DR01w1C.png
  400. <dubyadud> https://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/t_original/nrvz8jaorpkpzaawvuyi.jpg
  401. <Clozure> user reports:
  402. <Clozure> 2: Personal and confidential information
  403. <Clozure> 1: Reveals personal information
  404. <Clozure> 1: Has nothing to do with 3ds hacks.
  405. <Clozure> 1: Nice witch hunt, ban the parties involved and move along. Don't incite a mob.
  406. <Clozure> 1: has absolutely nothing to do with 3ds hacking
  407. <Clozure> 1: Threatening, harassing, or inciting violence
  408. <Clozure> 1: Spam
  409. <Clozure> 1: Insites witch hunt, the minor was of age in his country. Should not be here anyway.
  410. <Clozure> 1: wtf are you faggots posting. what does this have to do with 3dshacks you retards
  411. <Clozure> 1: PLEASE keep this trash off the subreddit. I come here for 3DS hacking stuff, not relationship drama.
  412. <Clozure> 1: Witch hunting, really?
  413. <Clozure> 1: Not 3DS hacking
  414. <Clozure> 1: Threatens, harrasses, or bullies
  415. <Clozure> 1: Irrelevant
  416. <Clozure> 1: <no reason>
  417. <Clozure> Plailect: sorry, but i just can't not lol at this, http://i.imgur.com/ODtxY4n.png
  418. <Plailect> heh
  419. <Clozure> Plailect: a report: 1: too much to say, refer to https://pastebin.com/sc3xMVS0. Delete,attacks individual,
  420. <Plailect> that's a stupid argument to make
  421. <Plailect> I didn't decide alone to post it
  422. <f916253> yerp
  423. <dubyadud> Plailect: shoulda made a throwaway account
  424. <Plailect> why?
  425. <s_99> Plailect: http://i.imgur.com/HDBiwxW.png
  426. <Plailect> the thread seems good as is tbh
  427. <Plailect> the shitposting and low quality posts were removed
  428. <Plailect> the "witch hunt" is done with
  429. <Plailect> besides
  430. <Plailect> the original post has been there for a day and it's too late to alter it
  431. <Plailect> since many have seen it
  432. <f916253> yeah its fine as is
  433. <Clozure> uhhhhhhhhhhhh https://www.reddit.com/r/3dshacks/comments/67bofh/recent_community_opinions_thread/
  434. <Plailect> IDK what "community opinion means" to him
  435. <Plailect> the score of 415 would indicate to me that the community is on my side
  436. <Plailect> wtf?
  437. <Plailect> post is gone?
  438. <f916253> I thought the intention was to leave it be and let it "fade out"
  439. <Plailect> ...
  440. <Plailect> someone?
  441. <s_99> https://www.reddit.com/r/3dshacks/comments/67bzcg/in_light_of_recent_events_a_message_from_the/
  442. <Plailect> that is complete horse shit
  443. <LOCAP> So was the way this was handled
  444. <Plailect> oh really? not covering up the abuse of a minor is handling it poorly?
  445. <LOCAP> Still not covering up. It's something that happened, I said that in the post, and I issued a warning for everyone to be careful online. That's all that should've been done in the first place, no more, no less.
  446. <Plailect> IDGAF about the privacy of a community member when they commit crimes
  447. <LOCAP> Simply put, your post was an attack, not a warning. I know there were good intentions behind it, but it went too far.
  448. <Plailect> they deserve to be exposed
  449. <LOCAP> So let the police arrest them, try them, find them guilty, and then the media will do the rest
  450. <Plailect> https://www.reddit.com/r/3dshacks/comments/674ik7/psa_recent_community_events/dgnpkd2/
  451. <Plailect> this is still up
  452. <Plailect> 7:01 PM <s_99> Either way, if your post stays up. His does too.
  453. <s_99> It's gone.
  454. <Clozure> not like it's not cached in archives but whatever
  455. <LOCAP> I'm nuking the entire thread now actually
  456. <Plailect> 415 points
  457. <Plailect> 80% upvotes
  458. <Plailect> and you nuke it?
  459. <LOCAP> 1:55 PM <Plailect> the original post has been there for a day and it's too late to alter it
  460. <LOCAP> 1:55 PM <Plailect> since many have seen it
  461. <LOCAP> Yeah, I nuked it, and many have already seen it
  462. <LOCAP> I don't see your point here
  463. <LOCAP> The way this was handled was inappropriate. End of story.
  464. <Plailect> You gain nothing and only assist a predator by making it so less people see what he did
  465. <f916253> I don't want to get in the middle of this but I don't really agree with the removal of the thread either
  466. <s_99> Thats fine. It's done though.
  467. <LOCAP> I agree that a warning should have gone out, but I disagree with how it was handled, and I'm putting my foot down on this.
  468. <Plailect> You censor community supported exposure of a predator for vague reasons
  469. <Plailect> I told you I would go over your head if you made me, and this is too far
  470. <LOCAP> Your post needed to cover two things
  471. <LOCAP> 1. An inappropriate relationship occurred between a developer and a minor
  472. <LOCAP> 2. A warning to all other minors that this type of behavior is not healthy, acceptable, and illegal.
  473. <Plailect> It did both.
  474. <LOCAP> Yet you went beyond this, discussing things beyond your authority to do so.
  475. <Plailect> I only did so when the involved party showed up. Your reasoning is flimsy at best.
  476. <LOCAP> Humor me, though. How do you expect to go above my head?
  477. <LOCAP> Feel free to go to the reddit admins over this, they'll just direct you to law enforcement.
  478. <Plailect> Reddit admins?
  479. <Plailect> I don't need reddit admins.
  480. <Plailect> which of you support this exactly?
  481. <Miah_Molkot> I'm not a mod, but I just wanna be explicitly clear that I'm on Plai's side and that Dazzozo needs to be called out and ostracised. Doing otherwise sends the message that pedophiles are allowed in a community full of minors which revolves around a system marketed towards minors.
  482. <dubyadud> I dont think we need to address the community and point fingers, LOCAP's solution is good. They just gave you 450 upvoted Plailect because you wrote the guide
  483. <dubyadud> And he isnt even here
  484. <LOCAP> He got banned
  485. <dubyadud> From here?
  486. <LOCAP> Check #3dshacks
  487. <dubyadud> What a fag
  488. <Miah_Molkot> wow.
  489. <dubyadud> Whats up with his recent powertrip
  490. <f916253> ...have you not been paying attention to this situation?
  491. <LOCAP> https://3ds.guide/
  492. <LOCAP> Woo hoo
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement