9 Lesta Nediam LNC2016-01-30 1930 +cabadejo

Lesta Nediam LNC2016-01-30 1930 +cabadejo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DHAdA0chvJk&lc=z12mit4antjvi55jk04cefvylzvgc3hogvg0k
https://pastebin.com/WbQ2iVhE
outcomes; stacking arguments
__

+cabadejo __ You wrote a good summary of things on that post. I saw your message there not long after you had sent it but it has taken this long to write anything to you. I've fallen behind on many things but will try to(!) catch up soon.







For what it's worth I'd never seen the glitches we see in the "Jack Steven" footage before. They seem artificial and intentional. (E.g., there are two straight [diagonal] lines throughout.)







It was also odd that the interview only existed with "fortress music" and that Sky News called his label "fortune music" (that may have been intentional - because of the way "Jack Steven" reacted it was as though he saw it written incorrectly on the teleprompter).







The controversy between "David Bowie" and "Jack Steven" appears intentional (which would further explain the glitches and why only the copy with glitches exists online and the seeming "unfamiliarity" of him by Sky News etc.







*Pay attention to the channels creating and encouraging a belief that these are the same people.* It can all be used in a *"stacking argument"* against the suggestion that the "ISS" is BS. For example: *"they think the Earth is flat and they think 'Jack Steven' is 'David Bowie' and so it's no surprise they call the 'ISS' BS".*







It's a so-called non-sequitur but one which is appealing to "normal people" who don't dare hold any "conspiracy beliefs". For the "stacking argument" to work [despite at all times being wrong] it would need to be shown that I do assert that the Earth is flat and that I do think "Jack Steven" is also "David Bowie" (but of course - even if I did assert those things it is irrelevant *because they are not connected* and it's possible to believe *true things for false reasons* [which is three quarters of the definition of a "shadow belief"!] but I am characteristically digressing!)







*An aside:* I can see a plan to discriminate against those who hold "conspiracy beliefs" (or are "open to conspiracy beliefs") i.e., that there will be consequences for holding beliefs that are counter to the prevailing cultural beliefs. This may lead to voting rights being taken (what would a "conspiracy theorist" care? they don't believe in voting anyway!). Discriminate against colour? _Bad!_ Discriminate against religion? _Bad!_ Discriminate against flat Earthers? *_Go for it!_*







When I post about the "ISS" glitches I wonder if the YouTube accounts (other than "NASA") will be blamed for the glitches we routinely see. Remember: we once encountered a lie along those lines (with regard to the "zero gravity gymnastics routine") where we were told: *"it's not like that in the 'NASA' archives".*







(Which was BS but it's a sneaky Winnard-style argument because silent readers may be left with an impression that it's true.)



__________________________________________
Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's posts, comments, videos and discussions:
https://pastebin.com/Bfr5RMSg

Here is Lesta Nediam's Google Plus posts (i.e., blog) - this is where Lesta is most active:
https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ

Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's video uploads:
https://pastebin.com/WV42jUb1

Here is Lesta Nediam's YouTube channel - for videos about the lie system:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w