Fathers Rights Denied over Spite


But you have a valid reason for each and every day. Right?
What exactly would you deem a valid reason? So no, I probably don't have a 'valid' reason according to you, but yes, I have each and every one of those dates and times (except for a couple of those screenshots that only have 'today' and no date, but I'll assume I've got those written down too) written down with a note about why the phone wasn't picked up. Thanks for the screenshot proof of you calling outside the times marked on the order though, now I've got more than just my notebook as proof.

What's your point? Trying to show that we didn't answer the phone? I've already got a notebook full of dates and times that the phone wasn't picked up, and what was going on at the time. So... good for you I guess?

Meghann MacKenzie

Sent from Outlook
From: Nathan Lawlor <nalcorp.holdings@gmail.com>
Sent: April 28, 2019 1:22 PM
To: Nathan Lawlor; Meghann MacKenzie
Subject: Kids

But you have a valid reason for each and every day. Right?
Thanks for the screenshot proof of you calling outside the times marked on the order though, now I've got more than just my notebook as proof.


Does this show you're cooperative?

All I want is to see my children.

But go on.
Show quoted text
What on earth shows that YOU are cooperative? You've been trying to bully and intimidate me pretty much since I decided I wasn't dealing with your cheating and drug use.

If I don't agree with you right away, you started calling the RCMP, you've threatened court I've lost count of how many times.

You actually told the RCMP that you would respect the children's wishes if they didn't want to see you --- and then immediately started telling me I'm not cooperating, and that all you want is to see your kids.

I've heard NOTHING about the kids themselves from you. I've just heard what you want for yourself. Sorry, but yourself isn't my concern anymore. My concern is the kids. What's best for them, what they want, and keeping their lives as constant and dependable as I can.

I don't feel that you drifting in and out of their lives since we split is what's best for them. They deserve a parent that's there, not one that gets a whim to see them and then disappears for months at a time. Go ahead and blame me for you disappearing, I'm used to that... but eventually YOU have to take responsibility for your actions.

I know that's hard to do, seeing as you live with your parents and have them take care of you.. but dude. Come on. How long are you going to blame everyone else for you not moving forward in life. It's really not that hard to pick yourself up, get a course, get a job and keep it and be a productive member of society. Hell, I did it with two little kids and the only support I had was from my family.

Meghann MacKenzie


Sent from Outlook
From: Nathan Lawlor <nalcorp.holdings@gmail.com>
Sent: April 28, 2019 10:53 PM
To: Meghann MacKenzie
Subject: Re: Kids

Show quoted text
My God.

If you weren't denying me access we wouldn't be fighting, do you not understand this?

What are we fighting over other than my not BEING ALLOWED to see my kids?

& Are you really still upset after a decade?

#TimeToMoveOn

The only reason I called outside of scheduled access was to reach you as for almost 90 days you found every reason possible not to answer the phone.....

The only reason I'm  speaking to you is cause I want to see my kids.

The only reason i have to go to court to see my kids is cause you said so.

Question

 Did you really take for the sake of the children or just skim the reading material on the website?

Another question. Let it sit in.

Can you fathom not being able to see them?

 Imagine it.

You say I'm not there for the kids yet you outright deny my rights to see them.

Whatever tho.
Show quoted text
I mean why the fuck else do i need to speak with you. You never fail to bring up the past or my current situation like it's a joke. That's all I need to hear.

.sarcasm.
I mean.
Thanks for being supportive and all... keeping it civil... keeping to your own business and not putting your nose in my business
.endsarcasm.

The only legitimate response to me asking to see my kids is "when?"

You'll learn quickly
Show quoted text
Well i guess that's not the only legitimate response. But that type of response. You know. Like. Yea no problem. Come by and pick up the kids. It's been such a shitshow it got to this and you want to keep going....lol
Show quoted text
Reality. You do not want me in the kids lives.

Image. You cry I'm mot there for the kids all the while denying me access.

Home Run. Can you say you've worked with me cooperatively over the past decade. Over the past three years  wbdat
Show quoted text
So unless you want to drag this out.

Which is my assumption.

Prove me wrong.

Rather than let me see my kids without causing a scene like you both normally do.

Just keep responding the way you do.

Or. Grow up ?
Show quoted text
I'll say again. I'm not the one that disappeared in and out of the kids lives over and over and over again.

Blame me for it all, fine. But realize that just because you think it's all my fault doesn't make it true.

Meghann MacKenzie

Sent from Outlook
From: Nathan Lawlor <nalcorp.holdings@gmail.com>
Sent: April 30, 2019 1:14 PM
Show quoted text

Show quoted text
Ok. I lived in Toronto.
Grasp that fact.

How often did I come home to visit?
When I could.

How long have I been back home, Meghann?
Since 2016.

How long have you denied me access?
Since 2017.

Have you been cooperative and supportive of my being there for the kids?

Example. I arrive in a taxi. Ask the kids to run in and grab swim shorts. Mike starts yelling at me about how I should have called. He keeps yellingand I close the TAXIs window. Mike walks up and continues to yell at me through the window as I'm apologizing to Rene for his yelling at me. This is over the kids having to take two three minutes to get their gear. The kids come out and he's still yelling.... like.... really?????????????????????

This happens all the time. I have countless occasions have had this happen to me. We have twenty calls to the rcmp.

But.

You're supportive in my being there for the kids right? Always have been. Right? ....

Show quoted text
& I don't just blame you. I blame Mike. I blame you. I also accept my own shitlist of mistakes especially when it comes to my children. The thing is.

You say I just blame you and that you're supportive and want me in the kids lives just to portray the image you want to portray.

But I don't. Just as you're not supportive not want me in the kids lives.

Mike adopting the children has been you're sole purpose and reasoning.
Show quoted text
Ok. You lived in Toronto... that was your choice. You moved away from the kids purposely, and it's not even as if you moved for some amazing job opportunity to improve your life and in return the kids lives.

You like to play the blame game, fine. I'm used to you blaming me for everything. The point is, is that whether you say I've blocked your access or not, the fact remains is that you've always done whatever you felt like it and if I say no, or you didn't give any notice... that's my fault.

The point is the kids deserve parents that are there for them. Consistently. Which you haven't been. You've been the one to move away, or disappear, or have no contact for months at a time. In the past I was more than accommodating, dealing with the aftermath of confused kids who didn't know why they only saw or heard from you every 6 months.

Blame me, but now the kids are older, have their own experiences with dealing with you, and have seen for themselves time and again that they can't count on your word.

So. Take absolutely no responsibility for yourself, keep playing the victim. I'm done. I'm looking at the kids best interests. Not what you want.

Blaming things on Mike is such a cop-out. You've done your share of yelling and freaking out at us in front of the kids. He has literally spelled out for you what you could have done, and you've just ignored. Same as me with the child support, telling you to file paperwork to say your income had changed... Nothing difficult, and you wouldn't owe as much as you do now... but then... you would have had to take responsibility for something.


Meghann MacKenzie

Sent from Outlook
From: Nathan Lawlor <nalcorp.holdings@gmail.com>
Sent: May 4, 2019 12:17 AM
Show quoted text

Show quoted text
Wow.

And you say I'm delusional...

Do you actually believe your facade?
Show quoted text