API tools faq
paste
k98kurz

Rijndael vs Twofish (TrueCrypt benchmarks)

k98kurz
Dec 23rd, 2014 (edited)
338
0
Never
Add comment
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 0.85 KB | None | 0 0
raw download clone embed print report
  1. Rijndael (AES) vs Twofish (AES finalist)
  2. TrueCrypt benchmarks
  3. Hardware-accelerated AES turned off
  4. CPU idling at 1-5%; 6.5GB used by (idle) programs + Windows
  5. W7 Ultimate; FX-4100 CPU
  6. 16GB 1866 RAM (2x4GB Patriot Viper 3 + 2x4GB Corsair Vengence); 9-10-9-27 timing
  7.  
  8. 50MB buffer, mean encrypt/decrypt speed (MB/s)
  9. Rijndael Twofish
  10. 259 276
  11. 261 291
  12. 289 245
  13. 233 297
  14. 305 298
  15. 344 256
  16. 310 279
  17. 357 300
  18. 354 269
  19. 354 297
  20. _______________________
  21. 306.6 280.8
  22.  
  23. 100MB buffer, mean encrypt/decrypt speed (MB/s)
  24. Rijndael Twofish
  25. 308 241
  26. 320 235
  27. 284 236
  28. 323 247
  29. 303 231
  30. 298 266
  31. 314 237
  32. 309 266
  33. 323 246
  34. 315 245
  35. _______________________
  36. 309.7 245.0
  37.  
  38. Note: though I did not record it, Serpent (2nd place AES finalist designed with twice the intended level of security) had slightly above half the mean speed of Rijndael for most runs.
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Public Pastes
We use cookies for various purposes including analytics. By continuing to use Pastebin, you agree to our use of cookies as described in the Cookies Policy.  OK, I Understand
Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!