mdthr

trinity dichotomous key two

Mar 15th, 2023 (edited)
135
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 2.72 KB | None | 0 0
  1. Regarding what to believe for the Trinity, either:
  2. a) we can know what the true belief is
  3. B) we can't know what the true belief is (the belief is rationally unknowable)
  4.  
  5. if a, either:
  6. c) we can know the true belief is not a contradiction
  7. D) we can know the true belief is a true contradiction (denying Laws of Non-Contradiction & Identity)
  8.  
  9. if c, either:
  10. e) we know the belief is a statement of Predication
  11. f) we know the belief is a statement of Identity
  12.  
  13. if e, either:
  14. g) the belief is classical Predication
  15. H) the belief is non-classical Predication (special-pleading numerical identity — Social-Trinitarianism [1+1+1=1])
  16.  
  17. if g, either:
  18. G¹) the predication subsists within some other essence (the belief is Partialism [⅓+⅓+⅓=1])
  19. G²) the predication does not subsist within some other essence (the belief is Tritheism [1+1+1=3])
  20.  
  21. if f, either:
  22. F¹) the belief is modes of identity, mutually equative Predication (the belief is Modalism [1|2|3=1])
  23. F²) the belief special-pleads/denies the Law of Identity (Relative Identity Trinitarianism)
  24.  
  25. So, there are three types:
  26. 1) (G¹, G², F¹) — Heresies
  27. 2) (B, D) — Some type of Mysterianism
  28. 3) (H, F²) — What is not a solution classically
  29.  
  30.  
  31.  
  32.  
  33.  
  34.  
  35. Regarding what to believe for the Trinity, either:
  36. I) we can know what the true belief is
  37. ii) we can't know what the true belief is (the belief is rationally unknowable)
  38.  
  39. if I, either:
  40. I.I) we can know the true belief is not a contradiction
  41. I.ii) we can know the true belief is a true contradiction (denying Laws of Non-Contradiction & Identity)
  42.  
  43. if I.I, either:
  44. I.I.I) we know the belief is a statement of Predication
  45. I.I.II) we know the belief is a statement of Identity
  46.  
  47. if I.I.I, either:
  48. I.I.I.I) the belief is classical Predication
  49. I.I.I.ii) the belief is non-classical Predication (special-pleading numerical identity — Social-Trinitarianism [1+1+1=1])
  50.  
  51. if I.I.I.I, either:
  52. I.I.I.I.i) the predication subsists within some other essence (the belief is Partialism [⅓+⅓+⅓=1])
  53. I.I.I.I.ii) the predication does not subsist within some other essence (the belief is Tritheism [1+1+1=3])
  54.  
  55. if I.I.II, either:
  56. I.I.II.i) the belief is modes of identity, mutually equative Predication (the belief is Modalism [1|2|3=1])
  57. I.I.II.ii) the belief special-pleads/denies the Law of Identity (Relative Identity Trinitarianism)
  58.  
  59. So, there are three types:
  60. 1) ( ii, I.ii) — Some type of Mysterianism
  61. 2) ( I.I.I.ii, I.I.II.ii) — What is not a solution classically
  62. 3) (I.I.I.I.i, I.I.I.I.ii, I.I.II.i) — Heresies
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment