JaysonSunshine

darwin: racism, lack of accountability, poor integrity, prop

Dec 14th, 2019
337
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 10.26 KB | None | 0 0
  1.  
  2. darwin
  3. https://barenakedislam.com/2019/12/14/minnesotastan-did-massive-muslim-voter-fraud-help-get-somali-muslim-congresswoman-ilhan-omar-elected-to-office/
  4. darwin
  5. i'm skeptical this is the case. Someone was charged with 13 counts of it. What about all the other cases? Isn't it hard to pull off?
  6. darwin
  7. or were they implying this person got thousands of fake votes in? Wouldn't it be thousands of charges then?
  8. fieryUSA
  9. it's authoritarianism disguised as trolling. the right wing has found a great new device, in the form of trolling, where they can float out authoritarian trial balloons, and then go 'just kidding!' once called out. it's pretty pathetic...and especially pathetic from a preacher, who is supposed to NOT divide people.
  10. infspire
  11. darwin: I consider your source invalid.
  12. infspire
  13. "barnakedislam"
  14. infspire
  15. Do you have any valid sources, or a reason why this source is valid?
  16. infspire
  17. "barenakedislam"
  18. darwin
  19. you had not reason it's invalid. What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence
  20. darwin
  21. here's part of the same story from a mainstream source: https://minnesota.cbslocal.com/2019/11/05/minneapolis-man-charged-with-absentee-ballot-fraud/
  22. darwin
  23. 'no reason'
  24. infspire
  25. I do have a reason.
  26. infspire
  27. Are you familiar with Bayesian inference?
  28. infspire
  29. It states there are two classes of 'evidence': Evidence proper, which is those things which you collect after you've set your priors for this round, and the priors themselves, which, if you're doing iterative Bayesian reasoning -- the default -- contain the evidence from the previous rounds.
  30. infspire
  31. That is, no, not all evidence must be collected with immediacy due to some context.
  32. infspire
  33. Which we all intuitively know, as we don't start reasoning from first principles every time we have a new thought on any topic.
  34. infspire
  35. So, what are the priors in this case?
  36. infspire
  37. Well, we know there is a tremendous amount of propaganda on the internet at this time, that Islam is a very frequent target of that propaganda, and that Ilhan Omar is an especially frequent target of propaganda.
  38. infspire
  39. We know this from prior evidence which is now constitutes our prior.
  40. infspire
  41. So, the prior is that a random website you've never heard of that is critical of Islam has a pretty reasonable chance of being propaganda.
  42. infspire
  43. Next, let's analyze the role of "barenakedislam" in this context.
  44. infspire
  45. It's a thing putatively operating as a source, i.e. it determines which things are true -- limited by its credibility of course.
  46. infspire
  47. That is, it operates in the role -- you cited it as a source -- as a thing which tells us which other things are true.
  48. infspire
  49. That you perceive the burden is on me to show it is invalid is a complete inversion of Hume's dictum -- to whatever relevance it has in contemporary epistemology which is generally rooted in Bayesian inference.
  50. infspire
  51. No: You need to show to us that something you're offering as a source that none of us have ever heard of -- in opposition to something like the New York Times, Nature, or Reuters -- is a credible source.
  52. infspire
  53. That's how that works.
  54. infspire
  55. Furthermore, I went to the website, and it has a very basic web layout which generally correlates with propaganda websites.
  56. infspire
  57. Furthermore, a 10 second scroll through the main page indicates the page is extremely disreputable.
  58. infspire
  59. For example, they are carrying this story: https://barenakedislam.com/2019/12/14/turkish-muslim-cenk-uygur-who-is-running-for-congress-denies-the-armenian-genocide-but-approves-of-sex-with-animals/
  60. infspire
  61. However, Cenk Uygur has repeatedly denounced his prior view that there was no Armenian genocide.
  62. infspire
  63. He's done that as recently has about two weeks ago.
  64. infspire
  65. He has been 100% consistent on this for years.
  66. infspire
  67. I believe he last believed the Armenian genocide was fake in his early 20s or younger.
  68. infspire
  69. He's now 49.
  70. infspire
  71. So, that's a propaganda smear piece.
  72. infspire
  73. That now, not using the prior but the evidence, indicates -- along with the prior -- that barenakedislam is invalid.
  74. infspire
  75. Furthemore, you dramatically lose credibility for linking to this site, as you posited it as credible.
  76. infspire
  77. You have twenty minutes to respond -- the time between my comment after your last comment.
  78. infspire
  79. If you do not make a convincing case why your sharing of this propaganda isn't exactly what it seems to be, then I will ignore you for sharing propaganda.
  80. infspire
  81. Sharing propaganda is a crime against humanity.
  82. infspire
  83. The Minnesota site mentions 13 cases, which is not "massive".
  84. infspire
  85. It doesn't mention Ilhan Omar's name.
  86. infspire
  87. I think it's >98% I'm going to ignore you independent of what you say.
  88. infspire
  89. As your propaganda is extremely egregious.
  90. infspire
  91. But, I said 20 minutes, and so I'll hold to that.
  92. infspire
  93. By independent of what you say, I mean that I don't think there's anything you'll be able to say to modify the evidence -- and priors -- against you.
  94. darwin
  95. yeah, so apparently that site has some incorrect stuff
  96. infspire
  97. I just added "barenakedislam" to my browser block list.
  98. infspire
  99. I am now unable to see any stories from that domian.
  100. infspire
  101. domain*
  102. infspire
  103. darwin: Do you agree the video in your link provides zero evidence there was even a single fraudulent vote cast for Ilhan Omar?
  104. darwin
  105. i didn't watch the video. I read the article
  106. infspire
  107. Are you aware there is no article associated with your link?
  108. infspire
  109. It's just an extended headline and a video.
  110. infspire
  111. (>99%, now)
  112. darwin
  113. there's some text
  114. infspire
  115. Muslim resident, Abdihakim Amin Essa, who is not even a citizen nor eligible to vote, has been charged with 13 counts of felony voter fraud in Minnesota. Essa also worked on a campaign of a local politician, but prosecutors won’t reveal the name of the politician or that politician’s party.
  116. infspire
  117. That's the "article"
  118. infspire
  119. Zero mentions of Ilhan Omar.
  120. infspire
  121. Do you agree the headline of the article is 100% unsubstantiated by the 'evidence' on the website you linked that is hosting the headline?
  122. darwin
  123. might be; might not be. Since CBS lists the same charge, I can't imagine another candidate that person would've done it for. It is exaggeration to say it was 'massive'
  124. infspire
  125. https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/nov/5/abdihakim-amin-essa-minneapolis-man-charged-felony/
  126. infspire
  127. No wrongdoing is alleged on the part of the people attempting to cast the 13 ballots. All 13 were rejected by election officials.
  128. infspire
  129. Do you recant your story 100%?
  130. infspire
  131. This is now the required standard, given this last citation.
  132. infspire
  133. "All 13 were rejected by election officials."
  134. darwin
  135. i didn't write a story. I posted a link for discussion then made two critical comments of it myself
  136. infspire
  137. You are required to recant 100%.
  138. infspire
  139. Unless you have additional evidence.
  140. darwin
  141. darwin> i'm skeptical this is the case. Someone was charged with 13 counts of it. What about all the other cases? Isn't it hard to pull off?
  142. darwin
  143. <darwin> or were they implying this person got thousands of fake votes in? Wouldn't it be thousands of charges then?
  144. infspire
  145. The link you linked literally just made up it was Ilhan Omar's campaign because the dude was Muslim.
  146. infspire
  147. So, the alleged criminal in this case is a Muslim, and she's a Muslim, so it's connected.
  148. infspire
  149. That's the textbook definition of racism.
  150. darwin
  151. Islam isn't a race
  152. infspire
  153. Do you agree that's the textbook definition of racism?
  154. darwin
  155. Islam isn't a race
  156. darwin
  157. it has people of all races
  158. infspire
  159. If I replace Muslim with something you consider a race, do you agree that is the textbook definition of racism?
  160. infspire
  161. darwin: I put you on ignore.
  162. infspire
  163. I find your mind highly objectionable.
  164. infspire
  165. I'm a philosopher-sociologist-scientist with a verbal IQ of 154-161.
  166. infspire
  167. There are no human races.
  168. infspire
  169. By the standard, historical definition of race.
  170. infspire
  171. It was a folk taxonomic idea that was largely pre-science. However, most humans believe in races.
  172. infspire
  173. Just like most humans believe in gods, even though there are no gods.
  174. infspire
  175. So, we have terms like racism.
  176. infspire
  177. Does racism have meaning as a word? Yes, even though there are no human races.
  178. infspire
  179. Humans construct meaning from their beliefs. These beliefs correspond somewhat to reality, and somewhat not.
  180. infspire
  181. Racism is a phenomenon that occurs in the minds of humans and their constructed meaning, but it can't be found in reality outside human experience, as there are no human races.
  182. infspire
  183. Human races were disproved in the 1970s as a result of advances in molecular genetics.
  184. infspire
  185. Humans construct things like "African-American" or "Japanese" or "Muslim".
  186. infspire
  187. Their widely held social identities that have, generally, important visual signifiers, differential breeding rates, etc.
  188. infspire
  189. In this way, Islam is extremely similar to African-Americanism or Japaneseism -- neither of which are races, either.
  190. infspire
  191. As there are no human races.
  192. infspire
  193. It's just all made up meaning, but our minds make it real.
  194. infspire
  195. This is all pretty obvious.
  196. infspire
  197. If you make judgments about Muslims based on their Muslimness, that is about as objectionable as making decisions off African-Americans based off their African-Americanness.
  198. infspire
  199. Now, you tried to argue the point that "Islam isn't a race".
  200. infspire
  201. Which is a valid sociological and philosophical topic.
  202. infspire
  203. Except, you didn't demonstrate thinking on this level.
  204. infspire
  205. And you linked to a propaganda website with a single paragraph as the article with no evidence for the headline.
  206. infspire
  207. You then employed defense mechanisms that avoid accountability for your actions, indicating low character.
  208. infspire
  209. And then you dared tried to remind me, the philosopher-sociologist-scientist who just gave you a primer on Bayesian inference that "Islam isn't a race".
  210. infspire
  211. I'm the teacher, in our interactions.
  212. infspire
  213. So, in a 30 minute period, you 1) linked to a racist, propaganda article on Muslims and Ilhan Omar, 2) inverted Hume's maxim, 3) avoided accountability for the terrible story you linked, 4) avoided responsibility for your racism against Islam
  214. infspire
  215. And that is why I ignored you.
  216. infspire
  217. I will remove you from ignore in two months.
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment